https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40205
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40205=edit
gcc7-pr78614-2.patch
Perhaps better patch (if it works). The previous patch would copy even rtxes
that simplify_*rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
Bug ID: 78616
Summary: [7 regression] bootstrap fails for x86_64-darwin at
stage1 after 243030 when the bootstrap compiler
doesn't have strndup
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78615
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.0, 6.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > Which glibc was used? You may run into:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20495
>
> Please run your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
Ah, sorry if I misunderstood and got carried away.
>From my investigation it looks like for the '' issue it's just a
matter of setting DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN in create_omp_child_function (not sure
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
If I'm reading things right, it looks like libiberty provides an implementation
of strndup if it's not available, but it doesn't provide a decl for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40206
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40206=edit
gcc7-pr78614-3.patch
The better patch actually doesn't seem to be much better, because
simplify_replace_fn when it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even for TYPE_PRECISION (dirtype) == TYPE_PRECISION (argtype), if one is signed
and the other is unsigned, are you sure that for VR_RANGE we do the right
thing?
Again, should be backed out by sufficient
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
This is still on my list of things to take care of before the release but I
haven't had a chance to work on it yet. Sorry about that. I think the minimum
safe solution is to xfail the tests for the target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> The far more important thing is that the handling of different argtype and
> dirtype really doesn't work. Consider:
>
> __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Created attachment 40205 [details]
> gcc7-pr78614-2.patch
>
> Perhaps better patch (if it works). The previous patch would copy even
> rtxes that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> trying this (after regnerating gcc/configure and gcc/config.in)
>
> $ git diff gcc/configure.ac include/libiberty.h
> diff --git a/gcc/configure.ac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
I've tracked down the problem to do_remat:
The function scans instruction forward in each basic block and looks for a
candidate to use for rematerialization. To check whether the candidate is used,
it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78615
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is valid code and here is why:
struct QListNode is incomplete.
You use an instantiation of QList via class B which means all methods of
QList are instantiated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> Which glibc was used? You may run into:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20495
Please run your testcase with
# LD_BIND_NOW=1 ./test
with and without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #7 from James Greenhalgh ---
Right, I've trimmed too much context from my message.
This performance regression starts with r239219 which adds a cost model to the
threader which relies on frequency information (arguably this is a bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> Which glibc was used? You may run into:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20495
Fedora 25:
$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40206|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
Bug ID: 78617
Summary: LRA clobbers live register during rematerialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
I can confirm the slowdown with -mavx on ivybridge-E:
-msse4
real0m0.278s
user0m0.276s
sys 0m0.002s
-mavx
real0m0.699s
user0m0.696s
sys 0m0.003s
in -msse4 case, perf report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> If I'm reading things right, it looks like libiberty provides an
> implementation of strndup if it's not available, but it doesn't provide a
> decl for it.
indeed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 40206 [details]
> gcc7-pr78614-3.patch
>
> The better patch actually doesn't seem to be much better, because
> simplify_replace_fn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78615
Bug ID: 78615
Summary: error: cannot decrement a pointer to incomplete type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40204
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40204=edit
gcc7-pr78614.patch
This fixes the testcase for me in a cross. Could somebody try
--enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
trying this (after regnerating gcc/configure and gcc/config.in)
$ git diff gcc/configure.ac include/libiberty.h
diff --git a/gcc/configure.ac b/gcc/configure.ac
index 703250f..ece1ffa 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78618
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Working variants :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
character :: c = char(256,4)
print *, rank(c)
end
$ gfortran-7-20161127 z2.f90
z2.f90:2:19:
character :: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
Anton Shterenlikht changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mexas at bristol dot ac.uk
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78619
Bug ID: 78619
Summary: ICE in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.c:889
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78602
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:43:17 2016
New Revision: 243044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243044=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Michael Meissner
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78560
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:43:17 2016
New Revision: 243044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243044=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Michael Meissner
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
Bug ID: 78620
Summary: C++11, Padding bytes not zero-intialized when POD is
initialized with compiler generated default
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78618
Bug ID: 78618
Summary: ICE in gfc_check_rank, at fortran/check.c:3670
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #11 from Jan Lachnitt ---
Thank you all for a rapid investigation of the problem.
Here is a confirmation with the large test case:
jenda@VivoBook ~/Bug reports/gfortran/6/PhSh1 $ gfortran-6 phsh1.f -std=legacy
-I. -march=core-avx-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622
Bug ID: 78622
Summary: [7 Regression] -Wformat-length/-fprintf-return-value
incorrect with overflow/wrapping
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 40210
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40210=edit
test for strndup and publish it from libiberty if not available from the host.
bootstrap (all langs,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71293
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78621
Bug ID: 78621
Summary: lambda mangling not ABI compliant
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Nov 30 19:16:03 2016
New Revision: 243081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243081=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78586 - [7 Regression] Wrong code caused by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 30 17:35:40 2016
New Revision: 243038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243038=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Vladimir Makarov
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71443
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78602
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78560
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78621
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175
Andrew Benson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 58175, which changed state.
Bug 58175 Summary: [OOP] Incorrect warning message on scalar finalizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78623
Bug ID: 78623
Summary: non-dependent name treated as if it were dependent,
requiring use of template keyword
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
By last patch you mean #c7? #c11 is just an improvement on top of that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha ---
Well, it's not over. W/ the same patched gcc from #comment4 I still see this:
% cat ygkelvbv.c
unsigned int ao, gl;
void
ri (void)
{
for (;;)
{
if (ao != 1)
ao /= 0;
gl = 0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:41:26 2016
New Revision: 243000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243000=gcc=rev
Log:
simplify-rtx: Add missing line for previous commit (PR78583)
The comment for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78609
Bug ID: 78609
Summary: invalid member's visibility detection in constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Do you have a test-case (not necessarily reduced) that I can use for testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, m.ostapenko at samsung dot com wrote:
>
> > /home/max/src/glibc/resolv/ns_print.c:99: undefined reference to
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Comment #7 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Confirmed fixed for all source files in which I'd seen the problem. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
Bug ID: 78608
Summary: gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: negation
of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type
'long int'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Nov 30 09:26:51 2016
New Revision: 243003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243003=gcc=rev
Log:
Support nested functions (PR sanitizer/78541).
PR sanitizer/78541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
While I'm at it, I'll move the constraint to the return type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Nov 30 09:50:04 2016
New Revision: 243005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243005=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/78592
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 40197
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40197=edit
Fix
Right.
Attached patch fixes build error (perhaps all sparc stuff should go upstream,
because I think we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78590
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78609
--- Comment #1 from Fedor Bobkov ---
To walk around this bug just change visibility of "data" member to public.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78584
--- Comment #7 from Marcel Böhme ---
My system parameters:
KERNEL VERSION: Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.19.0-59-generic x86_64)
GLIBC: Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.9
FILE SYSTEM: ext4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:01:47 2016
New Revision: 242998
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242998=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78586
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (format_integer):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78590
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:24:59 2016
New Revision: 242999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242999=gcc=rev
Log:
combine: Don't mess with subregs of floating point (PR78590)
PR78590 shows a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
760 static inline cp_token *
761 cp_lexer_previous_token (cp_lexer *lexer)
762 {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For example:
markus@x4 ~ % cat bench.ii
struct A {
enum { __value };
};
template _OI __copy_move_a2(_II, _OI);
template void copy(_II, _II, _OI p3) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I also hit:
gcc/real.c:2890:25: runtime error: left shift of negative value -125
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40198
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40198=edit
untested patch to check if type is integral or pointer type.
Hi,
Well, this seems to happen for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 ~ % cat real.ii
class A {
int N;
static const int D = 1 << 31;
int _fn1() const;
};
int ::m_fn1() const { int a((double)N / D); }
markus@x4 ~ % UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414
ycn65201 at noicd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ycn65201 at noicd dot com
|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On current trunk ...
gcc version 7.0.0 20161130 (experimental) [trunk revision 243005] (GCC)
... the ICE is gone and gfortran gives the following output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo