[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] New: RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 Bug ID: 84058 Summary: RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/84043] -fsanitize=alignment leads to massive compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84043 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81082] [8 Regression] Failure to vectorise after reassociating index computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/66313] Unsafe factorization of a*b+a*c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313 Bug 66313 depends on bug 81082, which changed state. Bug 81082 Summary: [8 Regression] Failure to vectorise after reassociating index computation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/81082] [8 Regression] Failure to vectorise after reassociating index computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81082 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 26 10:30:36 2018 New Revision: 257077 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257077=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-26 Richard Biener PR

[Bug lto/83997] ICE with alias template and attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83997 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is actually much worse than just some ICE with -flto. template using T = int __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof(int) * N))); T<4> q; template int r __attribute__((vector_size (sizeof(int) * N))); void

[Bug libstdc++/84056] map insertes a pair when check a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/84056] map insertes a pair when check a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Alper Ce from comment #3) > I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i > just used == operator to check value of it. Again, did you read the doc for operator[]?

[Bug libstdc++/84056] map insertes a pair when check a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056 --- Comment #5 from Alper Ce --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) > (In reply to Alper Ce from comment #3) > > I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i > > just used == operator to check value of it. >

[Bug c++/83937] [7/8 Regression] C++17 binds braced init of a type T to default arg of a ctor instead of using T's own default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83937 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/77504] "is used uninitialized" with allocatable string and array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug libstdc++/83981] vector::resize(size_type) should not require T to be CopyInsertable when std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83981 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #11) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > > Perhaps Daniel can comment, since he wrote the resolution of lwg 2033. > > > > Daniel, if the intent was

[Bug sanitizer/81929] [7/8 Regression] exponential slowdown in undefined behavior sanitizer for streaming

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81929 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sduvan.gcc at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/84043] -fsanitize=alignment leads to massive compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84043 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2018-01-26

[Bug c++/84059] [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher, at config/i386/i386.c:32429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84059 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/84059] New: [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher, at config/i386/i386.c:32429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84059 Bug ID: 84059 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher, at config/i386/i386.c:32429 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug fortran/84060] New: Wrong assignment from a class(*) variable which is a function result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84060 Bug ID: 84060 Summary: Wrong assignment from a class(*) variable which is a function result. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83950] [8 regression] error: no matching function for call to ‘folly::dynamic::at(size_t&) const’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83950 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84057] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in can_remove_branch_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84057 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/84061] New: [8 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c XFAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84061 Bug ID: 84061 Summary: [8 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c XFAIL Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, xfail Severity: normal

[Bug target/81763] Issues with BMI on 32bit x86 apps on GCC 7.1+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763 --- Comment #42 from Mike Lothian --- With the patch in Comment 36 I get the following error compiling Clang FAILED: lib/Lex/CMakeFiles/clangLex.dir/PPExpressions.cpp.o /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -m32 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE

[Bug c++/81086] [8 Regression] ICE with structured binding of initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81763] Issues with BMI on 32bit x86 apps on GCC 7.1+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763 --- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #37) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #33) > > > and it should work. The last case would be right now: > > SI:N+1 = SI:N &~ SI:N+2; SI:N+2 = SI:N+1 &~

[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- 0065ff3a : 65ff3a: b8 01 00 00 00 mov$0x1,%eax 65ff3f: c3 retq 65ff40: b8 01 00 00 00 mov$0x1,%eax 65ff45: c3

[Bug target/81763] Issues with BMI on 32bit x86 apps on GCC 7.1+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763 --- Comment #41 from Uroš Bizjak --- Let's go forward with this pattern: (define_insn "*andndi3_doubleword" [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=,r,r,") (and:DI (not:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand"

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84059] [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher, at config/i386/i386.c:32429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84059 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81086] [8 Regression] ICE with structured binding of initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81086 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug c++/84015] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84015 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/84056] map insertes a pair when check a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056 --- Comment #3 from Alper Ce --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > Where is the bug? Did you read the documentation for operator[]? I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i just used == operator to

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- https://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-old/c++bench-czerny/pb11/pb11-summary.txt-2-0.html runs with -Ofast -funroll-loops so indeed does not seem essential to trigger the regression (it may be two different ones of

[Bug rtl-optimization/83985] [8 Regression] Compile time hog for 32-bit BE powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83985 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 26 11:48:05 2018 New Revision: 257087 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257087=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/83985 * dce.c (deletable_insn_p): Return false

[Bug c/83989] [8 Regression] -Wrestrict false positive with malloc-style functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83989 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 26 11:47:11 2018 New Revision: 257086 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257086=gcc=rev Log: PR c/83989 * gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c

[Bug c++/84045] [7/8 Regression] ICE when is_nothrow_default_constructible is used before #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84045 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4 Summary|ICE when

[Bug c++/84062] error: no matching function for call to 'std::vector::push_back()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84062 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > Fixed on trunk by Richi's r256685. Is it intentional Richi that the revision > > should fix such situations? > >

[Bug lto/83997] ICE with alias template and attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83997 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems nothing actually handles the late attributes in TYPE_ATTRIBUTES that aren't {RECORD,UNION,CLASS,ENUMERAL}_TYPE. Tried: --- pt.c.jj52018-01-24 17:18:42.393392254 +0100 +++ pt.c2018-01-26

[Bug c/84063] New: Misleading diagnostic for ignored attributes under -Wattributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84063 Bug ID: 84063 Summary: Misleading diagnostic for ignored attributes under -Wattributes Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/84064] New: ICE in ix86_expand_prologue related to -fstack-clash-protection and memcpy on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84064 Bug ID: 84064 Summary: ICE in ix86_expand_prologue related to -fstack-clash-protection and memcpy on i686 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/82878] [7 Regression] ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Jan 26 13:48:37 2018 New Revision: 257089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257089=gcc=rev Log: [C++/82878] backport fix

[Bug c++/78495] [7 regression][new inheriting ctors] invisible-ref parm has address taken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78495 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Jan 26 13:48:37 2018 New Revision: 257089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257089=gcc=rev Log: [C++/82878] backport fix

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Fixed on trunk by Richi's r256685. Is it intentional Richi that the revision > should fix such situations? Not really. It means that the following hunk removes

[Bug middle-end/84048] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/tls/run-ld.c -O0 -pie -fPIE execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/84047] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds index into an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug gcov-profile/82614] GCOV crashes while parsing gcda file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84065] New: [8 regression] string_1.f90 fails since r256944

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84065 Bug ID: 84065 Summary: [8 regression] string_1.f90 fails since r256944 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard --- Without this Is there a way to read and write floats and doubles accurately without the rounding that converting to/from base 10 ends up introducing? How are you supposed to use istreams like

[Bug middle-end/84040] [8 regression] compilation time of gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-blockid.c is 50x slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84040 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Priority|P3

[Bug target/81763] Issues with BMI on 32bit x86 apps on GCC 7.1+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763 --- Comment #43 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #41) > Let's go forward with this pattern: > > (define_insn "*andndi3_doubleword" > [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=,r,r,") > (and:DI >

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug testsuite/84049] libgomp.c++/for-[56].C and libgomp.c/for-[56].c take a long time to run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- > > @@ -5150,15 +5145,9 @@ free_lang_data_in_type (tree type) > > { > > free_lang_data_in_binfo (TYPE_BINFO (type)); > > /* We need to preserve link to bases and virtual table for

[Bug target/84064] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue related to -fstack-clash-protection and memcpy on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84064 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/84062] New: error: no matching function for call to 'std::vector::push_back()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84062 Bug ID: 84062 Summary: error: no matching function for call to 'std::vector::push_back() Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/83985] [8 Regression] Compile time hog for 32-bit BE powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83985 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 26 12:24:53 2018 New Revision: 257088 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257088=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/83985 * dce.c (deletable_insn_p): Return false

[Bug tree-optimization/84053] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84053 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5 Summary|[5//6/7

[Bug tree-optimization/84057] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in can_remove_branch_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84057 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P2 Status|NEW

[Bug c/84054] seems -fno-bounds-checking no longer supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84054 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Firstly, GCC 4.8.1 has not been supported here for several years, and secondly the option is clearly documented as not doing anything for C.

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 > > --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug c/84054] seems -fno-bounds-checking no longer supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/83997] ICE with alias template and attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83997 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/83990] [7/8 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 43254 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43254=edit Lost location fix I'm testing this patch which does what Jakub suggested in comment #4. With the patch,

[Bug testsuite/84049] libgomp.c++/for-[56].C and libgomp.c/for-[56].c take a long time to run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84049 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- What's expensive on for-6.C? #pragma omp parallel for with 10 iterations each, doing #pragma omp atomic in there. For capping the number of threads, you can always just export OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 or something

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #5 from Ben Woodard --- The example code in: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/manip/fixed suggests that this should work. Probably either the behavior or the library or the example on cppreference should change.

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ben Woodard from comment #5) > The example code in: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/manip/fixed > suggests that this should work. Probably either the behavior or the library > or the

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #10 from Ben Woodard --- Also note: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/742775 My reading of: https://wg21.link/lwg2381 is that if the first part of the number includes a '.' then the portion after the 'p'

[Bug middle-end/84048] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/tls/run-ld.c -O0 -pie -fPIE execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 26 14:50:25 2018 New Revision: 257091 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257091=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-26 Richard Biener PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug target/83008] [performance] Is it better to avoid extra instructions in data passing between loops?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008 --- Comment #31 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com --- Richard, Thank you for your latest patch. This patch is exactly that I’ve discussed in this issue request. I tested it with SPEC20[06|17] and see no performance/stability degradation.

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 --- Comment #9 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've been investigating this and have identified the origin of the problem. The ICE occurs because tree-vect-stmts.c: vectorizable_call () is calling

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Heinz Kohl from comment #8) > o.k., it looks like a flawy definition. Yes, that's why it's being fixed by the standards committee. I don't want to change our implementation yet, until the

[Bug c++/82514] [8 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84067] [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc*-*-*, i?86-*-*, |powerpc*-*-*, i?86-*-*,

[Bug target/84066] New: Wrong shadow stack register size is saved for x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84066 Bug ID: 84066 Summary: Wrong shadow stack register size is saved for x32 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/83990] [7/8 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 43254 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43254 Lost location fix As use use it multiple time, perhaps do location_t loc = gimple_location (stmt); early and use loc

[Bug fortran/84065] [8 regression] string_1.f90 fails since r256944

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84065 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/83989] [8 Regression] -Wrestrict false positive with malloc-style functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ben Woodard from comment #4) > Without this Is there a way to read and write floats and doubles accurately > without the rounding that converting to/from base 10 ends up introducing? > How are

[Bug tree-optimization/84061] [8 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-15.c XFAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84061 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 --- Comment #8 from Heinz Kohl --- o.k., it looks like a flawy definition. First of all, it would be nice, if you would refer my error message to the right instance. It's unclear, what's to do in the meantime. An idea might

[Bug c++/82514] [8 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 26 15:25:23 2018 New Revision: 257093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257093=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82514 - ICE with local class in generic lambda. * pt.c

[Bug middle-end/84067] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84067 Bug ID: 84067 Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/wmul-1.c regression on aarch64 after r257077 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/84040] [8 regression] compilation time of gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-blockid.c is 50x slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84040 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/81440] -Wlto-type-mismatch warning with flexible array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Eric

[Bug c++/84059] [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher, at config/i386/i386.c:32429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84059 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43256 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43256=edit Untested patch

[Bug c++/84036] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code in C++14, variadic lambda capture in a template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84036 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/82878] [7 Regression] ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878 --- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell --- fixed on gcc-7 branch r257089.

[Bug middle-end/84040] [8 regression] compilation time of gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-blockid.c is 50x slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84040 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- I suggest the following (pre-approved if it works): Index: tree-vect-stmts.c === --- tree-vect-stmts.c (revision 257091) +++

[Bug middle-end/82123] [7/8 regression] spurious -Wformat-overflow warning for converted vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82123 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Eric

[Bug target/81763] Issues with BMI on 32bit x86 apps on GCC 7.1+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763 --- Comment #45 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Jan 26 15:36:32 2018 New Revision: 257096 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257096=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81763 * config/i386/i386.md

[Bug middle-end/84048] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/tls/run-ld.c -O0 -pie -fPIE execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84048 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-01-26 2:15 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Did you upgrade binutils? Yes.

[Bug middle-end/84019] [7/8 regression] ICE in fold-const of std::complex division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- The code in question is: const struct real_format *const fmt = REAL_MODE_FORMAT (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (type))); const int prec = fmt->p; const mp_rnd_t rnd =

[Bug testsuite/83983] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr83121 (test for LTO warnings, pr83121_0.C line 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu,

[Bug c/84046] [6/7/8 Regression] global zero-sized objects may have same address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84046 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Known to work|

[Bug testsuite/84049] libgomp.c++/for-[56].C and libgomp.c/for-[56].c take a long time to run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84049 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- FAIL: libgomp.c++/for-11.C execution test FAIL: libgomp.c++/for-13.C execution test have the same issue. They just lead to WARNING: program timed out. WARNING: program timed out.

[Bug tree-optimization/84051] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds access via an array pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

  1   2   3   >