https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
sergey.shalnov at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281
--- Comment #7 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
Oh, I just realize I misunderstood what ice-on-invalid means. Sorry about
that!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The function should have either be declared void or with a value return.
Otherwise, selective scheduler should be taught to not separate (insn 16) from
its use (insn 19):
...
(insn 17 9 18 2 (clobber (reg/i:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278
>
> Rainer Orth changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r217331.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84304
Bug ID: 84304
Summary: tree check fail in to_wide, at tree.h:5527
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83390
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
>> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr84278.c scan-assembler-not (%.sp)
>
> I'm blind - I cannot spot (%.sp) in the assembler. Hmm. Maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84304
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Range of revisions seems to be 256420 and 256556
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278
>
> --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84304
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
For a valgrind version of gcc trunk revision 256812, I see this:
/home/dcb/gcc/results.256812.valgrind/bin/gcc
==31515== Invalid read of size 8
==31515==at 0xFB02C6: canonize (wide-int.cc:96)
==31515=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84278
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 9 09:19:34 2018
New Revision: 257518
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257518&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84278
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
cse1 pass of gcc-7 converts several insns (15,16,19,24) in BB4 from:
12: L12:
13: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 4
14: flags:CCFPU=cmp(r89:DF,r90:DF)
15: r96:QI=ordered(flags:CCFPU,0)
16: r95:SI=zero_ext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84298
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84305
Bug ID: 84305
Summary: ICE inlining a VLA cast expression
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Created attachment 43382 [details]
> gcc8-pr84272-2.patch
>
> Or defer deletion of all the fma_nodes until the end, whether they are root
> or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Created attachment 43382 [details]
> gcc8-pr84272-2.patch
>
> Or defer deletion of all the fma_nodes until the end, whether they are root
> or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84305
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
This testcase:
--
int res, a, b;
void *foo;
static void f2 (int arg) { res = ((int (*)[arg][b]) foo)[0][0][0]; }
void f1 (void) { f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> This changed with r254167.
Please see PR 82692, comment #4. We need UNSPECs as an alternative to CCFPUmode
to prevent combine from changing CCFPUmode to CCFPmode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84304
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Seems to be fixed already? The backtrace is too short to make me remember the
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The ICE got fixed with r251433. Since then the error is:
pr77522.C: In instantiation of ‘void f(T) [with T = int]’:
pr77522.C:8:7: required from here
pr77522.C:3:8: error: use of ‘f(T) [with T = int]__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84304
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306
Bug ID: 84306
Summary: Wrong overload selected with -std=c++17, explicit and
{}
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84304
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 9 11:37:14 2018
New Revision: 257521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/77522
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com|
Summary|[6/7/8 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Hi Jakub,
First of all, thanks for beating me to it. Wanted to look at it but am fighting
strong headache since Wednesday.
Regarding the second patch, I believe it is the right approach but found
anoth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84208
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #7)
> Hi Jakub,
>
> First of all, thanks for beating me to it. Wanted to look at it but am
> fighting strong headache since Wednesday.
>
> Regarding the second p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43381|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
--- Comment #29 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Fri Feb 9 12:23:46 2018
New Revision: 257524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-09 Tamar Christina
PR target/82641
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307
Bug ID: 84307
Summary: asan blocks dead-store elimination
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308
Bug ID: 84308
Summary: [7/8 Regression] Memory leak in spread_components
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84307
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84308
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43385
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43385&action=edit
gcc8-pr84308.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
Bug ID: 84309
Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong-code with -ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r251230.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 43384 [details]
> gcc8-pr84272.patch
>
> So like this? A few additional changes, Florian Weimer suggested using
> preincrement instead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65674
Stas Sergeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66631
Stas Sergeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #13)
> IIRC, DECL_VALUE_EXPR is something like MEM_REF (-1). Yes, I’ll give it a
> try…
I submitted a candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310
Bug ID: 84310
Summary: -falign-{labels,loops,jumps} with value >= 32768+1
cause a segfault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to amker from comment #26)
> (In reply to amker from comment #25)
> > I tend to believe this is an register pressure based strength-reduction +
> > lim problem than ivopts.
> >
> > So given class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
mecej4 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mecej4 at outlook dot com
--- Comment #8 from m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213
--- Comment #15 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Fri Feb 9 14:02:37 2018
New Revision: 257526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DWARF: no location for non-definition DECLs with non-tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213
Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84282
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(same as PR 84012)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84272
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 43384 [details]
> gcc8-pr84272.patch
>
> So like this? A few additional changes, Florian Weimer suggested using
> preincrement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It should also be a power of 2, shouldn't it? Aligning anything to 4097 bytes
is just weird.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84311
Bug ID: 84311
Summary: compiler accepts invalid multiple type-specifiers in a
decl-specifier-seq for an enum
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84312
Bug ID: 84312
Summary: Variadic function without named argument not inlined
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43386
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43386&action=edit
gcc8-pr83987.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Bug ID: 84314
Summary: [8 Regression] Another ICE in
finish_member_declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84313
Bug ID: 84313
Summary: [F08] reject procedure pointers in COMMON blocks
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83307
--- Comment #1 from Chris Green ---
Verified as continuing to fail on MacOS High Sierra (XCode 9.2 / 9C40b) with
GCC 7.3.0 from homebrew with -DTRY=0 and -DTRY=1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84311
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:52:03PM +, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote:
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7)
> > Ugh. Statement functions should be removed from the Standard.
> > The simply fix, of c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Looks like a GC issue; I was able to reproduce it, albeit *very* slowly, via:
--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
on a slightly hacked up version of attachment 42843.
/builddir/build/BUILD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213
--- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor ---
Yes, 521.wrf_r indeed now builds fine with LTO. Thanks everyone for a quick
fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84213
--- Comment #18 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
Excellent, thank you for the feedback!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Feb 9 16:32:37 2018
New Revision: 257531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/83926
* config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_mul_v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
Moreover, without --param selsched-max-lookahead=2 sel-sched moves both the
assignment and use into middle of BB 2, breaking the assumption in
mode-switching that retval use is the last insn:
249
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84298
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The fix is to place a DECL_EXPR somewhere by the FE. We have some duplicates
> with similar issues.
Should c_fully_fold_internal the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84295
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Kre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315
Bug ID: 84315
Summary: missing -Wnonnull for trivial null pointer dereference
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84212
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Feb 9 17:58:54 2018
New Revision: 257534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/84212 - -Wno-* does not disable warnings from -flto link stage
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84212
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84316
Bug ID: 84316
Summary: -Wnull-dereference doesn't work with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84226
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 9 18:19:08 2018
New Revision: 257536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84226
* config/rs6000/vsx.md (p9_xxbrq_v16qi): C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 9 18:23:58 2018
New Revision: 257537
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257537&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/57193
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84315
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> Aww rats, I forgot about -Wnull-dereference.
>
> It's really unfortunate that -Wnull-dereference is disabled by default.
Maybe that's a decision worth revisitin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84309
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > Isn't this just an invalid test? I mean, when working with floating point,
> > especially when using -ffast-math,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84226
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84266
--- Comment #7 from Steven Munroe ---
Created attachment 43388
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43388&action=edit
correct mmintrin.h for power9
2018-02-09 Steven Munroe
* config/rs6000/mmintrin.h (_mm_cmpeq_pi32 [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84316
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|-Wnull-dere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84296
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
*** Bug 84314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317
Bug ID: 84317
Summary: [8 regression] SEGV in dwarf2out.c
(dwarf2out_source_line)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 9 19:10:42 2018
New Revision: 257538
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257538&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84296 - ICE with qualified-id in template.
PR c++/
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
