https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521
--- Comment #17 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I looked up what other targets were doing and one thing found to be interesting
was that a lot of them are defining the target hook
TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE. In AArch64 case I am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84745
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84752
Bug ID: 84752
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with constexpr array referenced in
lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 43588
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43588=edit
Prototype patch
I have to leave the office now but this is the (only very very lightly tested)
prototype patch that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59704
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84209
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Mar 7 19:30:31 2018
New Revision: 258339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258339=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84468 - bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment
after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Isn't that dup of 84149? Can you please tweak --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold
> to value to 200, 300, 400? Can you please attach -fdump-ipa-cp-details file?
I tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84747
--- Comment #3 from Stefan M Freudenberger ---
In this case I would have expected that TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_SUBSET_P will return
TRUE, as appropriate.
Granted, it would render my example invalid for x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737
--- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen ---
Created attachment 43589
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43589=edit
ipa-cp dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's a problem with maxval:
$ cat maxval_parameter_2.f90
! { dg-do run }
program main
integer, dimension(0,3), parameter :: i = 0
integer, dimension(0,3) :: j = 0
print *,maxval(i,dim=1)
print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Mar 7 20:27:11 2018
New Revision: 258340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258340=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: -mreadonly-in-sdata (PR82411)
This adds a new option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
Bug ID: 84753
Summary: GCC does not fold xxswapd followed by vperm
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84752
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
s/this loop/this function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70409
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Mar 8 00:42:41 2018
New Revision: 258347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258347=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-03-07 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Mar 8 00:42:41 2018
New Revision: 258347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258347=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-03-07 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83519
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Mar 8 00:56:07 2018
New Revision: 258348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258348=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83519 - missing -Wrestrict on an overlapping strcpy to a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83519
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #1)
> GCC 4.8.5 is out of service. This is fixed in all in-service versions of
> GCC (6.4 and later).
Interesting. I'm seeing it in GCC 7.2.0. Are you certain of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #16 from Jürgen Reuter ---
In addition to what Tobias remarked, NAG now gives a clear error message:
NAG Fortran Compiler Release 6.1(Tozai) Build 6138
Error: data.f90, line 13: Object TRLKOLD of type ACTIVE is default-initialised,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #2)
> (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #1)
> > GCC 4.8.5 is out of service. This is fixed in all in-service versions of
> > GCC (6.4 and later).
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|7.0 |7.3.0, 8.0
--- Comment #10 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've decided to fix it in RA because it could help to fix analogous bugs when
existing hard reg splitting code fails. This particular bug is more complicated
because it happens for non-small reg class.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81269
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84754
Bug ID: 84754
Summary: missing -Wrestrict on a possible strcpy overlap with
constant offset
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34516
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21547
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84749
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84698
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755
--- Comment #1 from June,Lim ---
Created attachment 43591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43591=edit
make all-gcc log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755
--- Comment #2 from June,Lim ---
Created attachment 43592
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43592=edit
GCC-4.6.0 configure log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34452
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35365
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84680
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84756
Bug ID: 84756
Summary: Multiplication done twice just to get upper and lower
parts of product
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26061
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20802
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755
Bug ID: 84755
Summary: GCC 4.6.0 build error with GCC-4.8.5 in Ubuntu 16.04
LTS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84679
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582
Bug 84582 depends on bug 84596, which changed state.
Bug 84596 Summary: [8 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected
expression '(bool)c' of kind implicit_conv_expr (cxx_eval_constant_expression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #7 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35614
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation, easyhack,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84742
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P3
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83206
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Roberts ---
RPI Zero still looks ok with latest snapshot.
/usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc -mfpu=auto -O3 -o matrix matrix.c
cc1: error: -mfloat-abi=hard: selected processor lacks an FPU
/usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc -mcpu=native
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 8 06:56:59 2018
New Revision: 258351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258351=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84739
* tree-tailcall.c (find_tail_calls):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84755
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
gcc 4.6 and 4.8 branches are old and not supported anymore. Besides, trying
4.6.0 (with unidentified patches!) instead of 4.6.N with the largest possible
N is just asking for trouble (the problem may already
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28508
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 8 07:29:42 2018
New Revision: 258354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258354=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/84740
* tree-switch-conversion.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84757
Bug ID: 84757
Summary: Useless MOVs and PUSHes to store results of MUL
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84682
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84751
Bug ID: 84751
Summary: ICE with debug build of gcc GIMPLE pass:
store-merging or IPA pass: cp
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #7 from Peter VARGA ---
This is the original version:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7)
> Created attachment 43571 [details]
> Tentative patch
>
> Works on nvptx for the examples from comment 0, comment 3 and comment 5.
Tested libgomp on x86_64 with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6)
> Looks like a duplicate of PR71536
Actually, this is not fixed by the patch, so likely another issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84723
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:16:07 2018
New Revision: 258316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258316=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/84723
* multiple_target.c: Include tree-inline.h and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81716
Bug 81716 depends on bug 83954, which changed state.
Bug 83954 Summary: [6/7 Regression] LTO: Bogus -Wlto-type-mismatch warning for
array of pointer to incomplete type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r258124.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
struct Y
{
static Y bar (Y y) { return y; }
int i;
int n = bar (Y{2,i}).m + bar {Y{2,i,i}).n;
int m = i;
};
is rejected, so I can't find a counter-example where PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs for
different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:43:23 2018
New Revision: 258319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258319=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r257183
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:43:49 2018
New Revision: 258320
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258320=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r257343
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:44:03 2018
New Revision: 258321
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258321=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r257412
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84741
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:47:46 2018
New Revision: 258328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258328=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r256989
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:48:44 2018
New Revision: 258330
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258330=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r257384
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:49:47 2018
New Revision: 258332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258332=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r257842
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:49:47 2018
New Revision: 258332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258332=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport r257842
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport from
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo