[Bug bootstrap/81397] mistakes in .opt files not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81397 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > As we're staying with Awk, for now I'm planning to work on that. > > Missing the word "not" in there? Yes, I was

[Bug ipa/87706] Inlined functions trigger invalid -Wmissing-profile warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/88054] Sanitizer triggers on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- The problem looks very similar to: 3537 #if SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_REALPATH 3538 INTERCEPTOR(char *, realpath, const char *path, char *resolved_path) { 3539void *ctx; 3540

[Bug preprocessor/82335] Incorrect _Pragma expansion in complex macro expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82335 --- Comment #1 from pskocik at gmail dot com --- This problem still persists in gcc 7.3.0. It appears pasting a macro containing `_Pragma`s into another macro is what's causing the displacement of the generated `#pragma`s. I've cleaned up the

[Bug testsuite/88053] [9 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1.C fails with r266194

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88053 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 16 09:27:36 2018 New Revision: 266202 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266202=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-16 Richard Biener PR testsuite/88053 *

[Bug testsuite/88053] [9 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1.C fails with r266194

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88053 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88050] Add a warning for breaking the "Rule of Three"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/88054] Sanitizer triggers on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/88004] [9 Regression] lto1: error: node differs from node->decl->decl_with_vis.symtab_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/88033] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu: in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges, at lra-lives.c:1179

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88033 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/88054] Sanitizer triggers on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Apparently i?86 glibc has two fopen entrypoints: 192: 000657d035 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 13 fopen@@GLIBC_2.1 193: 0011ec90 144 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 13 fopen@GLIBC_2.0 and libsanitizer

[Bug sanitizer/88054] Sanitizer triggers on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- The comment is bogus, that is the symbol versioning design, the only way how to stay ABI compatible even with the binaries that were written before the new symbol version has been introduced. For symbols

[Bug target/88055] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88055 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- It does not fail for me.

[Bug tree-optimization/88044] [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90 hangs after r266171

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug target/88055] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88055 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- $ ppc64le-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/home/marxin/BIG/bin/ppc64le/dev/shm/buildbot/install/gcc/bin/ppc64le-linux-gnu-gcc

[Bug target/88055] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88055 Bug ID: 88055 Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/88055] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88055 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ppc64le-linux-gnu Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/88056] New: gcc/config/i386/host-mingw32.c:170: use of out of scope pointer ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88056 Bug ID: 88056 Summary: gcc/config/i386/host-mingw32.c:170: use of out of scope pointer ? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/88056] gcc/config/i386/host-mingw32.c:170: use of out of scope pointer ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88056 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88048] [8/9 Regression] ICE in check_data_variable, at fortran/resolve.c:15491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88048 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/88058] gcc fails to detect use of out of scope variable ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug debug/88046] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/dwarf2out.c:19237 since r261885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/87521] [C++][ABI] Tail padding not reused for non POD struct with defaulted/deleted special member function as per Itanium ABI on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > Yes, on IRC Bruno already pointed out the problem with the comment 3 > example. That doesn't change my mind, I still think it would be madness for > an

[Bug c++/87521] [C++][ABI] Tail padding not reused for non POD struct with defaulted/deleted special member function as per Itanium ABI on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, on IRC Bruno already pointed out the problem with the comment 3 example. That doesn't change my mind, I still think it would be madness for an defaulted-on-first-declaration trivial destructor to

[Bug tree-optimization/88015] [9 Regression] ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.c:1287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/88056] gcc/config/i386/host-mingw32.c:170: use of out of scope pointer ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88056 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dannysmith at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/88053] [9 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1.C fails with r266194

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88053 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/88057] New: libdecnumber/decCommon.c:479: use of out of scope variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88057 Bug ID: 88057 Summary: libdecnumber/decCommon.c:479: use of out of scope variable Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Thanks for the testcase! --- a/test.go.115t.dom2 2018-11-16 10:45:27.663896672 +0100 +++ b/test.go.115t.dom2 2018-11-16 10:46:47.945357195 +0100 @@ -13937,7 +13937,7 @@ LKUP STMT _27 = aWord_58

[Bug sanitizer/88054] Sanitizer triggers on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug c++/88050] Add a warning for breaking the "Rule of Three"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88050 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your example doesn't even compile, the destructor is private. GCC now has -Wdeprecated-copy which warns for this fixed example: struct Type { ~Type() {} }; int main() { Type t; Type tt = t;

[Bug rtl-optimization/87485] [9 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -fschedule-insns -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-split-wide-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7) > It appears you are building via portage and thus have Gentoo patches applied? Yes, I build weekly snapshots via Portage for convenience. But I use modified

[Bug libstdc++/87618] [9 Regression] Missing symbol for std::__cxx11::basic_stringbuf, std::allocator >::basic_stringbuf()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/87618] [9 Regression] Missing symbol for std::__cxx11::basic_stringbuf, std::allocator >::basic_stringbuf()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87618 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I forgot to close it.

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- > Thread model: posix > gcc version 9.0.0 20181110 (experimental) [trunk revision 266003] (Debian > 20181110-2) > > Regards, > Arnaud Giersch The warning appeared again on trunk in r265875 Author: hubicka

[Bug other/88057] libdecnumber/decCommon.c:479: use of out of scope variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88057 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83941] Debug info generated with -flto contains useless forwarders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83941 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/88045] Call to std::accumulate causes gcov to crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Losilla --- I see, thanks. Well then, I guess I'll stick to the workaround. Good to know it is already fixed in version 9.

[Bug gcov-profile/88045] Call to std::accumulate causes gcov to crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Sergio Losilla from comment #3) > I see, thanks. Well then, I guess I'll stick to the workaround. Good to know > it is already fixed in version 9. Thanks. Next GCC 8.3 will have a workaround, so

[Bug target/83479] Register spilling in AVX code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83479 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks!

[Bug rtl-optimization/86438] [8 Regression] wrong code at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86438 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug c/88058] New: gcc fails to detect use of out of scope variable ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88058 Bug ID: 88058 Summary: gcc fails to detect use of out of scope variable ? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/86487] [7/8/9 Regression] insn does not satisfy its constraints on arm big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86487 --- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can confirm the ICE no longer occurs, but I am not entirely convinced the issue was "fixed" by this. I fear the underlying fault is still there, it is simply hidden now.

[Bug debug/87039] [8/9 Regression] DW_OP_fbreg used without a frame base on a C++ code w/ -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87039 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45006|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/84044] Spurious -Wodr warning with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044 Arnaud Giersch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnaud.giersch at free dot fr ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/87485] [9 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -fschedule-insns -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-split-wide-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/87025] [9 Regression] ICE in add_record, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86246] [8/9 Regression] Template dispatching error inside a template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87025] [9 Regression] ICE in add_record, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87025 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the note in question is from: if (dump_enabled_p ()) dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "-->vectorizing phi: %G", phi); and the failed

[Bug rtl-optimization/87918] [9 Regression] ICE in simplify_binary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:2153 since r264688

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 16 12:20:05 2018 New Revision: 266205 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266205=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/88011 *

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88050] Add a warning for breaking the "Rule of Three"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88050 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Gutson --- It is not the same and doesn't cover important cases: for example, the opposite one, there is a nontrivial copy ctor implementation but there is no nontrivial dtor. Or even between the special ctors, or

[Bug gcov-profile/88045] Call to std::accumulate causes gcov to crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Known to fail|9.0

[Bug lto/88004] [9 Regression] lto1: error: node differs from node->decl->decl_with_vis.symtab_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 16 12:49:32 2018 New Revision: 266207 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266207=gcc=rev Log: Fix ICE in lto_symtab_merge_symbols_1 (PR lto/88004). 2018-11-16 Martin Liska

[Bug rtl-optimization/87485] [9 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -fschedule-insns -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-split-wide-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/87706] Inlined functions trigger invalid -Wmissing-profile warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/88004] [9 Regression] lto1: error: node differs from node->decl->decl_with_vis.symtab_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87989] [8/9 Regression] Calling operator T() invokes wrong conversion operator overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Nov 16 11:51:51 2018 New Revision: 266204 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266204=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/86246] ICE tsubst explicit operator call

[Bug c++/86246] [8/9 Regression] Template dispatching error inside a template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Nov 16 11:51:51 2018 New Revision: 266204 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266204=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/86246] ICE tsubst explicit operator call

[Bug testsuite/88053] [9 regression] g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1.C fails with r266194

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88053 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 16 12:22:48 2018 New Revision: 266206 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266206=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-16 Richard Biener PR testsuite/88053 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/87485] [9 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -fschedule-insns -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-split-wide-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485 --- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha --- There must be something wrong w/ the way I configure gcc, then. It takes indefinite time compiling the testcase only at -O2 or -Os and finishes instantly at any other optimization level. But it also

[Bug rtl-optimization/88033] [9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu: in remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges, at lra-lives.c:1179

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88033 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/87706] Inlined functions trigger invalid -Wmissing-profile warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > > Assigning to Honza after we discussed that. > > So, this is kind of off-topic, but I've been wondering for a

[Bug debug/88046] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/dwarf2out.c:19237 since r261885

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/83215] C++: struct with char-array assumed to alias with everything

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83215 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, missed-optimization

[Bug c/88058] gcc fails to detect use of out of scope variable ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88058 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/88059] New: Spurious stringop-overflow warning with strlen, malloc and strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059 Bug ID: 88059 Summary: Spurious stringop-overflow warning with strlen, malloc and strncpy Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/87546] [9 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87546 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug go/88060] New: ../../../gcc-8.2.0/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_linux_utimesnano.go:17:18: error: reference to undefined name ‘_AT_FDCWD’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060 Bug ID: 88060 Summary: ../../../gcc-8.2.0/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_linux_utim esnano.go:17:18: error: reference to undefined name ‘_AT_FDCWD’ Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/88032] [9 Regression] ICE in operand_subword_force, at emit-rtl.c:1793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 16 16:40:53 2018 New Revision: 266216 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266216=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/88032 * optabs.c (expand_binop): For op0_mode use

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yup, looks like you got it. Thanks! update from 266192 to 266207: New passes: FAIL: crypto/dsa FAIL: crypto/ecdsa FAIL: crypto/elliptic FAIL: crypto/rsa FAIL: crypto/tls FAIL: crypto/x509

[Bug go/88060] ../../../gcc-8.2.0/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_linux_utimesnano.go:17:18: error: reference to undefined name ‘_AT_FDCWD’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- AT_FDCWD was added in glibc 2.4, released 2006-03-06.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87475] [8 Regression] ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1275

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug libstdc++/87855] std::optional only copy-constructible if T is trivially copy-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87855 --- Comment #6 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- Again, fixes the issue for me with clang!

[Bug c++/88061] New: section attributes of variable templates are ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061 Bug ID: 88061 Summary: section attributes of variable templates are ignored Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/87546] [9 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87546 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45026 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45026=edit gcc9-pr87546.patch Untested fix.

[Bug libbacktrace/88063] New: Libbacktrace leak on dwarf read failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88063 Bug ID: 88063 Summary: Libbacktrace leak on dwarf read failure Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug go/88060] ../../../gcc-8.2.0/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_linux_utimesnano.go:17:18: error: reference to undefined name ‘_AT_FDCWD’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060 --- Comment #4 from martin --- Created attachment 45025 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45025=edit /usr/include/linux/fcntl.h I found the AT_FDCWD in the file /usr/include/linux/fcntl.h

[Bug d/88040] gdc silently ignores -ffile-prefix-map

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88040 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- I don't suppose this could make use of the existing -fmodule-file= option, which translates a module name to a different file path?

[Bug c/88065] [9 Regression] ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an invalid strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c/88065] [9 Regression] ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an invalid strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/87546] [9 Regression] Gcc miscompiles at -O3 on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87546 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, I think the bug is in vect_look_through_possible_promotion, which doesn't do what it claims to do is that what it returns can be cast to unprom->type and then promoted to final precision and that it is

[Bug libbacktrace/88063] Libbacktrace leak on dwarf read failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88063 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > However, the allocation and deallocation is done in a loop over units, so if > find_address_ranges succeeds for the first unit, but fails for the second, > then

[Bug tree-optimization/87025] [9 Regression] ICE in add_record, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87025 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- David, I know it's off-topic here, but may I also ask you to look at the PR in the See Also section? Thanks.

[Bug c/88067] New: Internal Compuler Error, Segmentation Fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88067 Bug ID: 88067 Summary: Internal Compuler Error, Segmentation Fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/88059] Spurious stringop-overflow warning with strlen, malloc and strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/87506] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with inherited constexpr constructor with const argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87506 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I wonder if adjust_temp_type really needs to adjust type from one variant to another one (in this case the type of temp is A, but the type we want is const A). If it does for some reason, then perhaps

[Bug c++/87269] [9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15475 starting from r261802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Nov 16 15:01:55 2018 New Revision: 266210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266210=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/87269] Mark string operator overload in template defn.

[Bug c++/87269] [9 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15475 starting from r261802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening f2008 constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug other/88057] libdecnumber/decCommon.c:479: use of out of scope variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88057 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Interesting, what tool have you used to detect that? cppcheck, available from sourceforge. I find compile time warnings are usually preferred to runtime

[Bug tree-optimization/88064] [9 Regression] Incorrect vectorizer over_widening pattern handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88064 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/88051] internal compiler error: in add_clobbers, at config/i386/sync.md:1762

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88051 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Nov 16 16:42:16 2018 New Revision: 266218 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266218=gcc=rev Log: PR target/88051 * config/i386/i386.md (floatunsdidf2):

[Bug middle-end/87854] [9 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c ICE for 16-bit size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 16 16:41:54 2018 New Revision: 266217 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266217=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/87854 * c-common.c (fix_string_type): Reject string

[Bug rtl-optimization/87485] [9 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -fschedule-insns -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-split-wide-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov --- Martin, Jakub: if I add -fstack-protector-strong, the problem is reproducible for me - can you try that?

[Bug c++/86747] [8/9 Regression] rejects-valid with redundant friend declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/88065] New: [9 Regression] ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an invalid strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065 Bug ID: 88065 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an invalid strncpy Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/88062] New: tgmath with fadd vs faddl done wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88062 Bug ID: 88062 Summary: tgmath with fadd vs faddl done wrong Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

  1   2   >