[Bug middle-end/110055] Dangling pointer warning inside std::vector on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110055 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/109972] RISC-V: Could use umodsi3/udivsi3/divsi3 libcalls for 32-bit division/remainder on RV64 without M extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109972 --- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng --- We care but it's lower priority compare to other configuration, so create bug to tracking here should be best solution for now :P

[Bug tree-optimization/110062] missed vectorization in graphicsmagick

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110062 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/82856] --enable-maintainter-mode broken by incompatiblity of gcc's required automake and modern Perl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9edb6725717d668d144b2075f0dabf03ac4ec3d8 commit r14-1488-g9edb6725717d668d144b2075f0dabf03ac4ec3d8 Author: Thomas Schwinge

[Bug gcov-profile/110074] -fprofile-arcs profiles arcs generated by -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110074 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The profiling code cannot tell that apart, and yes, with sanitize recover we should. In principle we could detect all sanitizer calls to be in cold paths during profile estimation and have a profile

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 commit r14-1490-g04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 Author: Thomas Schwinge

[Bug fortran/87460] [F03] accepts-invalid bug with ASSOCIATE and array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87460 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87460, which changed state. Bug 87460 Summary: [F03] accepts-invalid bug with ASSOCIATE and array argument https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87460 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/110086] New: ICE when optimization level is changed using optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110086 Bug ID: 110086 Summary: ICE when optimization level is changed using optimize attribute Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- i386 is an overloaded term, sometimes it means just i386 CPUs and not i486 and later, at other times it means the all CPUs capable of running i386 32-bit code, sometimes it means ia32. I don't think it

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102112, which changed state. Bug 102112 Summary: Cannot associate with component of associate target https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/102112] Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/102532] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102532, which changed state. Bug 102532 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 What|Removed

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 --- Comment #20 from Arsen Arsenović --- I agree, it's probably better to just update all references to be clear that -m32 generates IA32 code, rather than i?86 code. IMO, for multilib, it's reasonable to target the same CPU as -m64 in terms

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 109948, which changed state. Bug 109948 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable() https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bf89a919fdab9e18b7ad3efaa1a79f1d7520ddf commit r14-1492-g7bf89a919fdab9e18b7ad3efaa1a79f1d7520ddf Author: Georg-Johann Lay

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87430, which changed state. Bug 87430 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/87430] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95068] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 95068, which changed state. Bug 95068 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102109, which changed state. Bug 102109 Summary: Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/110086] ICE when optimization level is changed using optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110086 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- That's usually a hint of a bug in the target specific option processing code.

Do you have 5 minutes

Dear Developers, We kindly request your participation in a short survey that will take just a few minutes of your time. Your feedback is crucial in helping us improve our products/services and enhance your overall experience. By sharing your thoughts, you'll play a significant role in shaping

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > I suppose you want to apply this generally, not only to offloaded > functions and when offloading is enabled? It could be done just for the functions that

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #54 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/29144] Missing if-conversion. If-conversion dependent on operand order. Inconsistent if-conversion.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29144 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||64700 See Also|

[Bug fortran/102532] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/99326] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102190] Syntax error reported in associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102112] Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 83154, which changed state. Bug 83154 Summary: ICE: associate and coarrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 83154, which changed state. Bug 83154 Summary: ICE: associate and coarrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/110080] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination at -Os when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-6945-g429a7a88438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110080 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.2 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/83154] ICE: associate and coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Brad, This is fixed on trunk (14-branch). I am going to close the PR for housekeeping purposes but will be sure to include the patch in a cumulative backport. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/106048] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 106048, which changed state. Bug 106048 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 What

[Bug fortran/106048] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/110087] New: Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Bug ID: 110087 Summary: Missing if conversion Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug testsuite/109951] [14 Regression] libgomp, testsuite: non-native multilib c++ tests fail on Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109951 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Thomas

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from ) > I am also somewhat puzzled by what conditions I need to take advantage of > the parallel running? > Darwin has

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55169|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/110050] experimental/simd/pr109822_cast_functions.cc fails on arm after g:668d43502f465d48adbc1fe2956b979f36657e5f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110050 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- Yes, I still need to backport because the new test is also present on the branches.

[Bug middle-end/110055] Dangling pointer warning inside std::vector on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110055 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa476528ceeac96865a48c49f3f1a15d566d209 commit r11-10840-gbfa476528ceeac96865a48c49f3f1a15d566d209 Author: Richard

[Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/109822] Converting std::experimental::simd masks yields an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109822 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/110085] New: make clean inside the gcc directory when configured with m2 language and for sh-elf messes up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110085 Bug ID: 110085 Summary: make clean inside the gcc directory when configured with m2 language and for sh-elf messes up Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/110059] When SPEC is used to test the GCC (10.3.1), the test result of subitem 548 fluctuates abnormally.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110059 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- The "after revert" numbers fluctuate more, so not sure what you are after.

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 --- Comment #27 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca4a4cc0060cb8ae1a326d6dbfcd9459452e1574 commit r11-10841-gca4a4cc0060cb8ae1a326d6dbfcd9459452e1574 Author: Jakub

[Bug fortran/85510] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression][Coarray] Linking error when accessing a coindexed variable inside an associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85510 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620324.html

[Bug fortran/102190] Syntax error reported in associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102190, which changed state. Bug 102190 Summary: Syntax error reported in associate construct https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/104430] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 104430, which changed state. Bug 104430 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430

[Bug target/110083] [14 Regression] ICEs for testcase on fp-int-convert*timode after r14-1466-g3635e8c67e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110083 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization Ever

[Bug c++/110064] spurious missing initializer for member for anonymous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/101188] [postreload] Uses content of a clobbered register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101188 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/110050] experimental/simd/pr109822_cast_functions.cc fails on arm after g:668d43502f465d48adbc1fe2956b979f36657e5f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/58517] ifcvt (after combine) puts ccreg clobbering insn between ccset insn and ccreg use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55237|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/99326] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 99326, which changed state. Bug 99326 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 What|Removed

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Keywords|

[Bug target/110088] New: [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 Bug ID: 110088 Summary: [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 > > Thomas Schwinge changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/58517] ifcvt (after combine) puts ccreg clobbering insn between ccset insn and ccreg use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > The reason why r6-3654-g6b7e867187889 didn't fix this case is because it was > not looking into clobbers only the set side. > > Note the conditional in my

[Bug fortran/93338] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 93338, which changed state. Bug 93338 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 What|Removed

[Bug debug/110073] [14 regression] btfout.cc format errors break bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-06-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 --- Comment #19 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #17) > I'm still confused. > > Conversely this means that the x86_64 'm32' multilib isn't actually "code > that runs on any i386 system", right?

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #16) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15) > > Created attachment 55225 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > The attached patch substantially tidies up

[Bug rtl-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- BTW: If the result of foo is random, then cmove gets badly predicted. Considering the problems with cmove on x86 (even without bad prediction), the above optimization can be quite important. Clang does it.

[Bug testsuite/109951] [14 Regression] libgomp, testsuite: non-native multilib c++ tests fail on Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109951 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > I am also somewhat puzzled by what conditions I need to take advantage of > the parallel running? > Darwin has /usr/bin/getconf and AFAICT the number of cpus is

[Bug target/109971] [14 regression] Several powerpc64 vector test cases fail after r14-1242-gf574e2dfae7905

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109971 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bffc52838e393a775e13dc48162669b0f43ebe09 commit r14-1493-gbffc52838e393a775e13dc48162669b0f43ebe09 Author: Ju-Zhe Zhong Date: Thu Jun

[Bug middle-end/110091] New: bogus -Wdangling-pointer on non-pointer values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110091 Bug ID: 110091 Summary: bogus -Wdangling-pointer on non-pointer values Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106769] PPCLE: vec_extract(vector unsigned int) unnecessary rldicl after mfvsrwz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106769 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/110094] Support __builtin_mem*_inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110094 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Also there is no definition of what a compile time constant is. The option supports non constant cases too.

[Bug c++/110070] Code quality regression with for (int i: {1,2,4,6})

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110070 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/110095] New: RISC-V: unrecognizable insn during RTL pass: vregs with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-u74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110095 Bug ID: 110095 Summary: RISC-V: unrecognizable insn during RTL pass: vregs with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-u74 Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/110073] [14 regression] btfout.cc format errors break bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/110061] libatomic: 128-bit atomics should be lock-free on AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #8) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #7) > > I don't see the issue you have here. GCC for x86/x86_64 has been using > > compare exchange for atomic load (which always does a

[Bug target/110096] Would be nice if __builtin_ia32_pause had a portable equivalent as it's applicable to ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110096 --- Comment #3 from Peter Dimov --- How does the user know when to include `arm_acle.h`?

[Bug fortran/100607] ICE with SELECT RANK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100607 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 06:06:59PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Fixed. > Thanks for taking care of the commit.

  1   2   3   >