[Bug libstdc++/114354] std::shared_ptr constructor constraints are checked too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114354 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/114363] New: inconsistent optimization of pow(x,2)+pow(y,2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114363 Bug ID: 114363 Summary: inconsistent optimization of pow(x,2)+pow(y,2) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/114357] Add a way to not call deconstructors for non-auto decls, like clang's no_destroy attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114357 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/114362] New: wrong error message "too many arguments" with overloaded function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114362 Bug ID: 114362 Summary: wrong error message "too many arguments" with overloaded function Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|12.4

[Bug tree-optimization/114363] inconsistent optimization of pow(x,2)+pow(y,2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114363 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl ---

[Bug c/114361] New: ICE with c23 when creating mutually nested and compatible types with statement expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114361 Bug ID: 114361 Summary: ICE with c23 when creating mutually nested and compatible types with statement expressions Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/114359] std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-16

[Bug c++/107500] [12 Regression] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.1.0 Target Milestone|13.0

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 Deepthi H changed: What|Removed |Added CC||deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #4 from Deepthi H --- I have been investigating this issue further. Hence checking the source code and debugging the gcc sources. However, I wasn't able to find where the COLLECT_GCC_OPTION has been set to 128kb I couldn't find it

[Bug libstdc++/114354] std::shared_ptr constructor constraints are checked too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114354 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah yes, thanks. It looks like I converted them to constraints for array support with g:a2e0054e1d169984ec64d64145b71a88a9628537 but only for the pointer conversions, I missed the delete expression.

[Bug libstdc++/114147] [11/12/13 Regression] tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114147 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a0a24b9a097452c576d5f409fe7efbafd6aef6b commit r13-8457-g8a0a24b9a097452c576d5f409fe7efbafd6aef6b Author: Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/114363] inconsistent optimization of pow(x,2)+pow(y,2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114363 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug libstdc++/114359] std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems to fix it: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc @@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION // sqrt(pi / 2)

[Bug c++/112631] gcc rejects block-scope declaration of function in a module unit even if the function is attached to the global module fragment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112631 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ead3075406ece9daaad65a01ae539150aee43f5a commit r14-9501-gead3075406ece9daaad65a01ae539150aee43f5a Author: Nathaniel Shead

[Bug c/114364] Untranslatable string 'in intervening code'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114364 --- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --- Oops, I misinterpreted the code, as 'in intervening code' is indeed translatable, but 'as loop variable' isn't, so the bug report is still valid.

[Bug middle-end/26187] computed goto code does not produce jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26187 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/31727] Functions with non-local gotos are considered not to have side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31727 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Andrew

[Bug c/54529] dead code elimination deletes code adressed by referenced labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Wasserthal at nefkom dot net ---

[Bug tree-optimization/114363] inconsistent optimization of pow(x,2)+pow(y,2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114363 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/114363] inconsistent optimization of pow(x,2)+pow(y,2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114363 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente --- Thanks Harald, I missed the point that float z = pow(double(x),2) and float z = x*x would indeed produce exactly the same result, while in all other cases of course not.

[Bug target/114049] gcc.dg/framework-1.c FAILs with Xcode 15.3 beta 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114049 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/114365] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 5 at -O with _BitInt() shift in a bitfield

-20240316151633-g218d1749612-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.1 20240316 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/114366] computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114366 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||godmar at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergstesh at yahoo dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/40115] -O2 and higher causes wrong label address calculation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40115 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Andrew

[Bug c++/55468] Label value to incorrect destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55468 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.girard5 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/55749] gcc 4.7.1 removes labels mistakenly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55749 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||blue_3too at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/114329] ICE: verify_gimple failed: 'bit_field_ref' of non-mode-precision operand with bitfield _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114329 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e8323e873c5af5047507d6b2cfbd12706820ee2 commit r14-9502-g3e8323e873c5af5047507d6b2cfbd12706820ee2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/113396] [13/14 Regression] csmith: differences from -O2 to -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396 --- Comment #18 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #17) > I tried out gcc-13.2 and got the following results: > > foundBugs $ ~/gcc/results.13.2.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -w -O2 > --param=max-inline-insns-auto=23

[Bug c/114366] computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114366 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- To use these values, you need to be able to jump to one. This is done with the computed goto statement6

[Bug c/96956] When gcc does not see a label used in a goto it gives the wrong label address &

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96956 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grantrwittmann at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/112870] incorrect jmp when using goto on a function, causing infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112870 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dhowells at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/77329] gcc doesn't always correctly calculate label addresses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77329 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.lynch@reasoningtechn

[Bug rtl-optimization/77951] Incorrect placement of label which does not affect execution flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77951 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug modula2/114296] ICE when attempting to create a constant set with a variable element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114296 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 57719 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57719=edit Proposed fix Here is the proposed fix. It corrects the virtual token creation for the aggregate constant and also

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremy at goop dot org --- Comment #11

[Bug middle-end/29305] local label-as-value being placed before function prolog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29305 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #12 from Andrew

[Bug c/19969] Labels broken when passed into inline assembly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19969 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note starting with GCC 4.5, gcc adds asm goto which can be used to do what is needed to be done here.

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] RISC-V: Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #25 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:218d17496122abe1fd831bd003f129310b32ca83 commit r14-9503-g218d17496122abe1fd831bd003f129310b32ca83 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/114329] ICE: verify_gimple failed: 'bit_field_ref' of non-mode-precision operand with bitfield _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/114364] New: Untranslatable string 'in intervening code'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114364 Bug ID: 114364 Summary: Untranslatable string 'in intervening code' Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug c/114364] Untranslatable string 'in intervening code'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114364 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/114366] New: computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114366 Bug ID: 114366 Summary: computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/114366] computed labels do not reflect true values of instruction pointer ranges when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114366 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114362] wrong error message "too many arguments" with overloaded function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114362 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/104343] improved error message for passing overloaded function to variadic(templated)-argument function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- Comment #6

[Bug middle-end/28581] Illegal loading the address of a label with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Andrew

[Bug c++/44298] code addressed only by label with it's address taken is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||inaoka.kazuhiro at renesas dot com ---

[Bug preprocessor/56306] -m32 does not support all includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/53212] cpp consumes comment after pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53212 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, clang has the same behavior here ... I don't know if it is the right one though.

[Bug libstdc++/114367] New: std::vector constexpr initialization doesn't start lifetime of array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114367 Bug ID: 114367 Summary: std::vector constexpr initialization doesn't start lifetime of array members Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty destructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #17 from

[Bug c++/78940] [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Known to work|

[Bug c++/53785] coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/87692] Reuse guard variable for multiple initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87692 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/87831] Guard variable is not eliminated when there's nothing to guard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87831 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/53785] coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/99242] [modules] ICE in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99242 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- A curious reduction: $ cat 99242_a.H bool __is_constant_evaluated(); $ cat 99242_b.H bool __is_constant_evaluated(); $ cat 99242_c.H bool __is_constant_evaluated(); $ cat 99242_d.C bool

[Bug middle-end/113396] [13/14 Regression] csmith: differences from -O2 to -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396 --- Comment #19 from David Binderman --- gcc 12.3 seems to get it right: foundBugs $ ~/gcc/results.12.3.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -w -O2 --param=max-inline-insns-auto=23 bug998.c && valgrind -q ./a.out checksum = 77A231E6 foundBugs $

[Bug target/56603] Different _MM_HINT_TX values from ICC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56603 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/53212] cpp consumes comment after pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53212 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/114367] std::vector constexpr initialization doesn't start lifetime of array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114367 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm: _Bit_pointer __p = _Bit_alloc_traits::allocate(_M_impl, _S_nword(__n)); #if __cpp_lib_is_constant_evaluated if (std::is_constant_evaluated()) { __n = _S_nword(__n);

[Bug c++/78940] [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug c++/59994] [meta-bug] thread_local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994 Bug 59994 depends on bug 78940, which changed state. Bug 78940 Summary: [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 What|Removed

[Bug c++/109268] Guard variable still provided for static constinit variable with an empty destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84411] Missed optimization: static guard variable generated for empty virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 68548, which changed state. Bug 68548 Summary: bogus "may be used uninitialized" (predicate analysis) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68548 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19794] [meta-bug] Jump threading related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794 Bug 19794 depends on bug 68548, which changed state. Bug 68548 Summary: bogus "may be used uninitialized" (predicate analysis) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68548 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/68548] bogus "may be used uninitialized" (predicate analysis)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|

[Bug c++/78940] [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||klaus.doldinger64@googlemai

[Bug c++/83730] Unnecessary generation of guard variables with -fno-threadsafe-statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83730 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/84411] Missed optimization: static guard variable generated for empty virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/99241] [modules] ICE in install_entity, at cp/module.cc:7584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/99242] [modules] ICE in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99242 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/44712] Debug info for partially inlined functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44712 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-16

[Bug c++/43127] Inconsistent and odd constructor calls.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43127 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/46247] bug with loading constant to neon quad register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46247 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The code looks correct in GCC 4.5.4 and above.

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Deepthi H from comment #4) > I have been investigating this issue further. Hence checking the source code > and debugging the gcc sources. However, I wasn't able to find where the >

[Bug target/51122] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59286] segfault in __sanitizer::StackDepotGet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59286 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/114367] std::vector constexpr initialization doesn't start lifetime of array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-03-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/109268] Guard variable still provided for static constinit variable with an empty destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109268 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84411] Missed optimization: static guard variable generated for empty virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||19661 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- There it is! I *knew* I had a PR entered for this, and was a bit surprised when the ipa attribute was introduced, that this PR wasn't cross-referenced. Then again I guess most people don't check in

[Bug c++/79561] Missed optimization: useless guards for zero-initialized POD statics with =default default ctor at function scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78940] [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.mutz at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/78940] [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug libstdc++/61735] pre-C++11 basic_string bug when type_size is char (-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61735 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|basic_string bug when |pre-C++11 basic_string bug

  1   2   >