https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45674
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-16 08:50 ---
(I have not regtested this yet.)
The (second) patch in comment #2 fixes the pr without regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45674
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 12:10 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks for the quick fix!
Well, it was *your* fix, so *I* should thank *you* :)
Anyway, I think the patch in comment #2 qualifies as obvious, and has no
regressions, as noted by Dominique.
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 13:13 ---
Subject: Bug 45674
Author: janus
Date: Thu Sep 16 13:12:59 2010
New Revision: 164338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164338
Log:
2010-09-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 13:14 ---
Fixed with r164338. Closing.
Thanks for the report!
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:57 ---
Confirmed. From a quick glimpse it seems the patch goes in the right direction.
Will have a closer look soon.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 14:46 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Index: fortran/interface.c
===
--- fortran/interface.c (revision 164288)
+++ fortran/interface.c (working copy)
@@ -1428,10
--- Comment #3 from dietmar dot ebner at gmail dot com 2010-09-15 15:36
---
(In reply to comment #2)
Actually I think this patch is ok. Are you interested in committing it
yourself? [Note that you'll need an FSF copyright assignment, if you don't
already have one.] Otherwise I can
