https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27
13:38:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 27 13:38:32 2012
New Revision: 193846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193846
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-26 14:58:12 UTC ---
On 11/26/2012 4:47 AM, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
A milestone of 3.0.x??
It seems I did this while updating the Last reconfirmed date. As I
understand it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26
16:36:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 28778
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28778
gcc48-pr52650.patch
P1 for an error-recovery bug sounds way too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #17 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-26 16:43:18 UTC ---
On 11/26/2012 11:36 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
P1 for an error-recovery bug sounds way too high, those should be P4-ish.
I just restored the previous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:32:31 UTC ---
I don't yet know if they are related.
Now I do: I've just built a 32-bit C-only compiler on
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 at r185563
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #3 from ro at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:51:46 UTC ---
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
[...]
If they are related
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:57:34 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #5 from ro at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:51:23 UTC ---
and with #if 1 they fail? As they are wrong-code regressions on
an architecture I have no access to, can you see what is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
23 matches
Mail list logo
