On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Let's say we have two for loops like this:
int my_func (int x, int y);
For (ii = 0; ii 1; ii++)
X[ii] = my_func (Y[ii], Z[ii]);
I assume X, Y and Z are
Hello,
On 05.09.2012 19:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, sel-sched doesn't handle correctly
tidying of empty blocks if fallthru predecessor ends with asm goto
that has some labels on the empty block in addition to the fallthru edge.
cfgrtl.c can handle that, so this patch
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:10:53PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
The inlininer likes to recreate some MEM_REF, it copies most of the
bits (TREE_THIS_NOTRAP, TREE_THIS_VOLATILE, etc.) but forgets about
TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS. This causes the strlen optimization to think the
memory store does not
Oleg,
Bootstrap fails at revision 190996 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with:
g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:10:53PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
The inlininer likes to recreate some MEM_REF, it copies most of the
bits (TREE_THIS_NOTRAP, TREE_THIS_VOLATILE, etc.) but forgets about
TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 12:50:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Patch preapproved, but you've attached a different patch.
Sorry about that. Here is the correct one.
Also is this ok for the 4.7 branch?
Yes, thanks.
--- tree-inline.c (revision 191004)
+++ tree-inline.c (working
On 06/09/12 06:41, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks very much for comments.
Ping?
Hi Ramana, could you help me review this patch?
Hi Eric, Richard, could you help me review the change in regcprop.c?
Subtraction of zero isn't canonical rtl though. Passes after peephole2
would
be
Yes, it may be feasible to rewrite the instruction in machine reorg
pass, rather than peephole2. But that need bigger change in ARM back
end.
Hi Ramana, Richard, what's your opinion on this?
Thanks very much.
I side with Richard on this one. The mid-end should only have to deal
On 05/09/12 17:01, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
This patch implements __builtin_bswap16() on ARM (v6 and above) using
revsh with a signed input and rev16 with an unsigned input.
It is pretty much equal to the patch posted some time ago
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
On 9/5/12, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
Modify gcc/*.[hc] double_int call sites to use the new interface.
This change entailed adding a few new methods to double_int.
Other changes will
This fixes -fno-tree-pta - noticed it doesn't work when trying
to compile a testcase where PTA uses too much memory.
Bootstrapped tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-09-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* passes.c (execute_function_todo): Call
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 09:49 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Oleg,
Bootstrap fails at revision 190996 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with:
g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic
-Wno-long-long
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Just some cleanups I did while working on something bigger.
OK for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
Ciao!
Steven
* graphite.c (print_global_statistics): Use EDGE_COUNT instead
of
Could you please commit this (I can't at the moment)?
Sorry, I don't have write access.
Dominique
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
bitmap.c:bitmap_last_set_bit() is not used by any code in the current
GCC trunk, but I'm using it and I noticed it returns an incorrect
result. This patch rewrites most of the function to return the correct
On 06/09/12 09:33, Bin Cheng wrote:
Yes, it may be feasible to rewrite the instruction in machine reorg
pass, rather than peephole2. But that need bigger change in ARM back
end.
Hi Ramana, Richard, what's your opinion on this?
Thanks very much.
I side with Richard on this one. The
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com
wrote:
Let's say we have two for loops like this:
int my_func (int x, int y);
For (ii = 0; ii 1;
On 6 Sep 2012, at 11:18, domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) wrote:
Could you please commit this (I can't at the moment)?
Sorry, I don't have write access.
OK, then I will commit it later today.
Cheers,
Oleg
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
ping
Conceptually I like the change. Can a libcpp maintainer please
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com
wrote:
Let's say we have two for loops like this:
int my_func (int x, int y);
For (ii = 0; ii 1;
Thank you for the comments.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:39 PM
To: Zhenqiang Chen
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable bbro for -Os
Basic block reordering is disabled for -Os from
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
AFAIU, my_func is defined in a separate library and because of the attribute
on the definition, it will actually export overloads:
int myfunc(int,int);
v2si myfunc(v2si,v2si);
v4si myfunc(v4si,v4si);
etc (where does it stop? seems problematic if the
This removes the MOVE_NONTEMPORAL tree flag which is nowhere set.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-09-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree.h (MOVE_NONTEMPORAL): Remove.
* tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Remove
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
When adjusting the C++ FE code generation for base type copies
I noticed the XFAILs on g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr41186.C and investigated
things a bit. We can fix the testcase easily iff the frontend
emits the MEM_REF
Oleg Endo schrieb:
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 14:39 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
I don't feel the m32c change needs my specific ack, it's a harmless
change that goes with the ack for the feature itself.
However, I will note that m32c does have different costs for addresses
in different address spaces,
The following fixes PR54498 - we may not treat already visited
parts of the CFG as non-aliasing after re-writing the expression
we lookup. Just abort the walk in this case.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu on the 4.7
branch, trunk testing in progress.
Richard.
2012-09-06
rs6000_debug_address_cost() needs to call TARGET_ADDRESS_COST with the
new arguments.
Committed.
- David
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_xcoff_asm_named_section): Add TLS
section.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_debug_address_cost): Add new
arguments to
Relax the logic that prevents TFmode constants being addressed in the
constant pool.
2012-09-06 Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_address):
Allow 16 byte modes in constant pool.
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
Hi,
This patch implements section anchors for the AArch64 port.
OK for aarch64-branch?
Regards,
James Greenhalgh
--
2012-09-06 James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com
* common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c
Enable the raising of exception in long double soft float and support
for rounding mode.
2012-09-06 Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/sfp-machine.h (FP_EX_INVALID, FP_EX_DIVZERO)
(FP_EX_OVERFLOW, FP_EX_UNDERFLOW, FP_EX_INEXACT)
On 06/09/12 15:31, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Hi,
This patch implements section anchors for the AArch64 port.
OK for aarch64-branch?
Regards,
James Greenhalgh
--
2012-09-06 James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com
*
On 2012-08-31 07:49, Ian Bolton wrote:
+(define_split
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 register_operand =r)
+ (const:DI (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 1 aarch64_valid_symref
S)
+ (match_operand:DI 2 const_int_operand
i]
+
+ [(set (match_dup 0) (high:DI
On 09/06/2012 08:06 AM, Ian Bolton wrote:
If I don't use my split pattern, I could alter combine to remove the
requirement that parent is a MEM.
What do you think?
I merely question the calling out of CONST as special.
Either you've got some pattern that handles SYMBOL_REF
the same way, or
Vtables were causing several different problems for constexpr:
1) Value-initializing a nearly-empty class (that has a vptr but no data)
meant two initializers for a single base. Fixed by not bothering to
zero out a type with no data before calling its constructor.
2) A primary base is
The current test is failing on some architectures because the underlying
gimple has changed. I believe the best way to test the speculative
store data race is with the simulate-thread/ harness. We already have a
speculative store test in the harness, so this will be a nice addition.
I have
On 09/06/2012 02:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
In all this seems unrelated to CILK+ work (even if you make use of this
from within CILK+).
While true, we also asked him to split up the work. And this piece,
done correctly, seems useful even if the rest of cilk is ignored.
r~
Hello Joseph,
Thanks for reviewing my patch. Please see my responses below:
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 8:07 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff
On 6 September 2012 10:48, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 05/09/12 17:01, Christophe Lyon wrote:
+(define_insn *arm_revsh
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 s_register_operand =r)
+ (sign_extend:SI (bswap:HI (match_operand:HI 1 s_register_operand
r]
+ TARGET_32BIT
On 09/05/2012 03:09 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
If we annotate *both* the function declaration and the function with the
following attribute, the compiler will create a vector and scalar version of
the function.
__attribute__((vector)) my_func (int x, int y);
__attribute__((vector))
Hello Marc,
Please see my response below.
Thanks for looking at my patch!
Sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Glisse [mailto:marc.gli...@inria.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 2:06 AM
To: Gabriel Dos Reis
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/06/2012 02:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
In all this seems unrelated to CILK+ work (even if you make use of this
from within CILK+).
While true, we also asked him to split up the work. And this piece,
done
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Ok, I was mistaken there. I thought we had to add a changelog entry for
every function and not every file. I will fix it in the updated patch I
send soon.
For functions in existing files you do need to mention each function - but
not for new files.
Hi,
On 09/06/2012 02:03 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
but note that for:
template class T
struct A
{
int select() { return 0; }
};
we have parser-num_template_parameter_lists == 1 and num_templates ==
0. Thus it seems that the case 'num_templates + 1' isn't (just) about
member templates...
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com
wrote:
Let's say we have two for loops like this:
int my_func (int x, int y);
For (ii = 0; ii 1; ii++)
X[ii] = my_func
Sorry, I didn't see this message. Please see my responses below:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Glisse [mailto:marc.gli...@inria.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 7:04 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis; Iyer, Balaji V; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff
Law;
On 06/09/12 17:07, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 6 September 2012 10:48, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 05/09/12 17:01, Christophe Lyon wrote:
+(define_insn *arm_revsh
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 s_register_operand =r)
+ (sign_extend:SI (bswap:HI (match_operand:HI 1
On 06/09/12 12:29, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
2012-09-06 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
* config/arm/arm.c: Use CONST_INT_P, CONST_DOUBLE_P, REG_P, MEM_P,
LABEL_P, JUMP_P, CALL_P, NOTE_P, BARRIER_P consistently.
* config/arm/arm.h: Use REG_P, MEM_P
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
On 09/06/2012 08:06 AM, Ian Bolton wrote:
If I don't use my split pattern, I could alter combine to remove the
requirement that parent is a MEM.
What do you think?
I merely question the calling out of CONST as special.
Either you've
On 09/06/2012 12:18 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 09/06/2012 02:03 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
but note that for:
template class T
struct A
{
int select() { return 0; }
};
we have parser-num_template_parameter_lists == 1 and num_templates ==
0. Thus it seems that the case 'num_templates + 1'
Doug was trying to build with gmp 4.2.1 and ran into this error:
gmp-4.2.1/include/gmp.h:515:12: error: 'std::FILE' has not been declared
This bug was fixed in gmp 4.2.3, so I've bumped the minimum
acceptable version in configure.ac
Tested on x86_64 with gmp 4.2.3. Committed to trunk.
Diego.
Most bits are stolen from Linux, but there are a few subtle
differences since our assembler is configured to be slightly more
HP-UX-ish.
libgcc/:
2012-09-06 Mark Kettenis kette...@openbsd.org
* config.host (hppa-*-openbsd*): New target.
* config/pa/t-openbsd: New file.
gcc/:
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 12:18 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff Law;
r...@redhat.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Merging Cilk Plus into Trunk (Patch 1 of
The attached patch eliminates the bootstrap failures in libstdc++-v3
of PR 54419 by having configure check for assembler support of the new
rdrnd opcode and defining _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND in config.h if supported.
Tested on x86_64-apple-darwin12 against the assembler from Xcode 4.4.1.
Okay for
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:48:34 +0200
Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Hello
The attached patch is a simple improvement to make a thread that
failed to set the waiting bit to exit the function earlier, if it
detects that another thread has successfully finished initialising.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
Okay for gcc trunk?
One typo:
* configure.ac: Test for rdrnd support in assembler.
It's rdrand. I wouldn't be pedantic if the opcode wouldn't have
changed from rdrnd to rdrand at some point and using the old
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Concepts such as pentium_4 are architecture-specific and have no place in
front-end files. This whole mapping from one sort of string to another
belongs
within the back end.
Please excuse me if I am beating this horse to death. I am asking this
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 14:41 +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Oleg Endo schrieb:
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 14:39 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
I don't feel the m32c change needs my specific ack, it's a harmless
change that goes with the ack for the feature itself.
However, I will note that m32c
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Doug was trying to build with gmp 4.2.1 and ran into this error:
gmp-4.2.1/include/gmp.h:515:12: error: 'std::FILE' has not been declared
This bug was fixed in gmp 4.2.3, so I've bumped the minimum
acceptable version in
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:13 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Doug was trying to build with gmp 4.2.1 and ran into this error:
gmp-4.2.1/include/gmp.h:515:12: error: 'std::FILE' has not been declared
This bug
The attached patch eliminates the bootstrap failures in libstdc++-v3
of PR 54419 by having configure check for assembler support of the new
rdrand opcode and defining _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND in config.h if supported.
Tested on x86_64-apple-darwin12 against the assembler from Xcode 4.4.1.
Okay for
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:22:10PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
The attached patch eliminates the bootstrap failures in libstdc++-v3
of PR 54419 by having configure check for assembler support of the new
rdrand opcode and defining _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND in config.h if supported.
Tested on
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:22:10PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
The attached patch eliminates the bootstrap failures in libstdc++-v3
of PR 54419 by having configure check for assembler support of the new
rdrand opcode and defining _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND in config.h if supported.
Tested on
On 2012-09-06 15:13 , NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Doug was trying to build with gmp 4.2.1 and ran into this error:
gmp-4.2.1/include/gmp.h:515:12: error: 'std::FILE' has not been declared
This bug was fixed in gmp 4.2.3, so I've
On 2012-09-06 15:16 , NightStrike wrote:
Actually, on closer inspection, other places list the minimum version
as 4.3.2, including:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
as well as the two locations that I mention above. Perhaps configure
should do likewise.
It already does
The attached patch eliminates the bootstrap failures in libstdc++-v3
of PR 54419 by adding a define to acinclude.m4, GLIBCXX_CHECK_X86_RDRAND, that
checks for assembler support of the new rdrnd opcode, using this new define
in configure.ac and also defining _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND in config.h if
On quinta-feira, 6 de setembro de 2012 13.33.11, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
Here's the patch as applied to trunk in rev. 191042. I'll apply it to
4.7 this weekend as long as nobody yelps.
Thanks. The change to ACQUIRE is also a bugfix.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:33:11PM -0700, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
Here's the patch as applied to trunk in rev. 191042. I'll apply it to
4.7 this weekend as long as nobody yelps.
2012-09-06 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
PR libstdc++/54172
* libsupc++/guard.cc
Hello!
We can use 32bit address without .code64 directive; this test is valid
for 32bit and 64bit targets.
2012-09-06 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* configure.ac (hle prefixes): Remove .code64.
* configure: Regenerated.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline
This patch adds a new dump flag that dumps PMU profile information using
the -pmu dump option.
This patch should be applied to google/main.
Tested with crosstools.
2012-09-06 Chris Manghane cm...@google.com
* gcc/doc/invoke.texi: Modified pmu-profile-use option.
*
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:55 PM, James Lemke jwle...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Attached are the patches for this gcc port.
On a recent checkout (r191027) I have run the DejaGNU suite with no new
failures for binutils, gas, ld, gcc, g++, gfortran. A bootstrap is in
progress.
Could you explain
Hi,
On 09/06/2012 07:47 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/06/2012 12:18 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 09/06/2012 02:03 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
but note that for:
template class T
struct A
{
int select() { return 0; }
};
we have parser-num_template_parameter_lists == 1 and num_templates ==
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Could you explain why you are changing system.h ?
Also seems like TARGET_VLE_ISEL should not be needed TARGET_ISEL is
always set for VLE targets.
You mean this:
+ POWERPC_E200_MASK = MASK_VLE | MASK_ISEL | MASK_MULTIPLE
? Well, this just marks
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Could you explain why you are changing system.h ?
Also seems like TARGET_VLE_ISEL should not be needed TARGET_ISEL is
always set for VLE targets.
You mean this:
+
Hi,
On 09/06/2012 10:32 PM, howa...@frodo.msbb.uc.edu wrote:
The attached patch eliminates the bootstrap failures in libstdc++-v3
of PR 54419 by adding a define to acinclude.m4, GLIBCXX_CHECK_X86_RDRAND, that
checks for assembler support of the new rdrnd opcode, using this new define
in
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Andrew Pinski wrote:
You mean this:
+ POWERPC_E200_MASK = MASK_VLE | MASK_ISEL | MASK_MULTIPLE
? Well, this just marks that the e200 processor supports ISEL regardless
of the mode selected (standard vs VLE). Then with -mvle ISEL is supposed
to be enabled
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, James Lemke wrote:
Attached are the patches for this gcc port.
On a recent checkout (r191027) I have run the DejaGNU suite with no new
failures for binutils, gas, ld, gcc, g++, gfortran. A bootstrap is in
progress.
The -t* options added duplicate -mcpu= options; the
On 09/06/2012 06:09 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Could you explain why you are changing system.h ?
That was a convenience to me at one point.
It should have been deleted from the patch set.
--
Jim Lemke
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
Orillia Ontario, +1-613-963-1073
I have committed this patch to the gccgo branch to add some cherry
picked bug fixes to the Go library. This is for internal release
purposes. The mainline and 4.7 tree remain at the Go 1.0.2 release. I
expect that most of these patches will be in Go 1.0.3.
The complete list of cherry-picked
I've committed this trivial comment patch to src/include/dwarf2.def
(and will shortly do the same in gcc/include).
-cary
2012-09-06 Cary Coutant ccout...@google.com
include/
* dwarf2.def: Edit comment.
diff --git a/include/dwarf2.def b/include/dwarf2.def
index 3c3dfcc..7fe2df1
On 09/06/2012 07:07 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The -t* options added duplicate -mcpu= options; the only existing
precedent appears to be arm-vxworks and I don't think the options are
appropriate for generic PowerPC target files (not specific to an OS port
such as VxWorks with its own special
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Chris Manghane cm...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds a new dump flag that dumps PMU profile information using
the -pmu dump option.
This patch should be applied to google/main.
Tested with crosstools.
2012-09-06 Chris Manghane cm...@google.com
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Chris Manghane cm...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Chris Manghane cm...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds a new dump flag that dumps PMU profile information using
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 06:47 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Is this an 'if-then-else' usage?
Yeah, but I typoed, sorry. It should be:
%{mips32r2|mips64r2:-msynci;:-mno-synci}
Richard
OK, I got that working now. I am still having some issues though. My
original patch was setup to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On all supported targets, plain nop is the correct thing
to use (cror 31,31,31 was for POWER).
Tested on powerpc64-linux --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran; no
regressions. Okay for mainline?
Segher
Fixed spacing and condensed repeated code into helper.
This patch should be applied to google/main.
Tested with crosstools.
2012-09-06 Chris Manghane cm...@google.com
* gcc/doc/invoke.texi: Modified pmu-profile-use option.
* gcc/tree-dump.c: Added new dump flag.
*
From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
For parallel LTO builds setting -fmem-report does not work very well
because all the LTRANS phases dump it in parallel and typically interleave
it to unreadability.
Since usually the memory bottleneck is WPA add a flag to only dump
the memory report for
This fixes part of the issue described in PR gcov-profile/54487 where
there were warnings about mismatches due to slight differences in the
merged histograms in different object files. This can happen due to
the truncating integer division in the merge routine, which could result
in slightly
87 matches
Mail list logo
