This patch implements the C++11 inheriting constructors feature: given
struct A { A(int); };
struct B { using A::A; };
the compiler defines B::B(int) that just passes its argument along to
the A constructor.
Ville started working on this feature a while back, but got tied up with
other
Il 15/10/2012 07:10, Joern Rennecke ha scritto:
2012-10-02 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* web.c (union_match_dups): Properly handle OP_INOUT match_dups.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00189.html
Ok.
Paolo
Il 14/10/2012 22:59, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Can we just simulate liveness for web, and drop REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV
notes that refer to a dead pseudo?
I don't think we want to do that. A REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV note can use a
pseudo that
The only versions of the Solaris assembler I have access to only support
v8plusX according to the man page. Has that changed recently?
For the older stuff I mean doing something like -m32 -xarch=v9X
OK, this is for fbe, not for as. I think that the latter is always available
on the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I don't think we want to do that. A REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV note can use a
pseudo that isn't live and still be valid. Consider a simple example
like this:
a = b + 3
// b dies here
c = a {REG_EQUAL b+3}
The REG_EQUAL note is valid and may
Il 15/10/2012 10:13, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
I disagree that it is valid. At least it is risky to consider it valid,
because a pass that simulates liveness might end up doing something
wrong because of that note. If simulation is done backwards, it doesn't
even require any
Hello,
I somehow initially forgot to implement DImode GBR based loads/stores.
Attached patch does that and also fixes a problem with the GBR address
mode optimization.
Tested on rev 192417 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=sh-sim
Hello,
This one refactors some copy pasta that my previous patch regarding this
matter introduced and catches more unnecessary sign/zero extensions of T
bit stores. It also fixes the bug reported in PR 54925 which popped up
after the last patch for PR 51244.
Tested on rev 192417 with
make -k
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I prefer to declare the notes invalid and drop the notes.
Then, afaic, our only option is to drop them all in web, as per attached patch.
I strongly disagree with this approach though. It destroys information
that is correct, that we had
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
Apparently vectorizable_load is another spot that could create vector
CONSTRUCTORs that wouldn't pass the new CONSTRUCTOR verification.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for
Hello,
This adds the test case from the PR.
Tested together with the patch posted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01380.html
OK?
Cheers,
Oleg
testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/54925
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54925.c: New.
Index:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the comments. As David wrote, the intent of the patch
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
apparently, in the optimization that recognizes that {v[1],v[0]} is a
VEC_PERM_EXPR, I forgot to check that v is a 2-element vector... (not that
there aren't things that
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch adds a short notice about some speed-ups in GCC 4.8 for
extremely large functions (coming from the work done on PR54146 by
several people).
OK for the wwwdocs?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
Ciao!
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch is a back-port of one of the scalability improvements I
made to perform, well, maybe not well but at least not so poorly on
the test case of PR54146, which has an extremely large function.
The
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
This is the execution failure of gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 in 64-bit
mode on SPARC/Solaris at -O3. The dse2 dump for the reduced testcase reads:
dse: local deletions = 0, global deletions = 1, spill
On 10/15/2012 05:00 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
Suppose you drop this into include/libiberty.h:
#ifdef __cplusplus
inline char *lbasename(char *s) { return
Hmm. I think this points to an issue with update_alias_info_with_stack_vars
instead. That is, this function should have already cared for handling
this case where two decls have their stack slot shared.
The problem here is that mark_addressable is called _after_ the function is
run. IOW, by
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
1) it handles constant folding of vector comparisons,
2) it fixes another place where vectors are not expected
Here is a new version of this patch.
In a first try, I got
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hmm. I think this points to an issue with update_alias_info_with_stack_vars
instead. That is, this function should have already cared for handling
this case where two decls have their stack slot shared.
The problem
This moves more non-tree fields out of the tree streaming routines
into the bitfield parts. One to go: strings.
LTO bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-10-15 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-streamer-out.c
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I prefer to declare the notes invalid and drop the notes.
I strongly disagree with this approach though. It destroys information
that is correct, that we had
Where is mark_addressable called? It's wrong (and generally impossible) to
do that late.
In expr.c:emit_block_move_hints. It's one of the calls added to support the
enhanced DSE last year, there are others in calls.c for example.
If you only have memcpy then escaped will be empty. fixing
For the attached Ada testcase, the compiler generates a double write to the
volatile variable at -O1. The problem is a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR on the rhs.
We have in store_expr:
If TEMP and TARGET compare equal according to rtx_equal_p, but
one or both of them are volatile memory refs, we
Thanks for the updates, they look good to me.
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
@@ -100,8 +102,9 @@
o for pseudos needing save/restore code around calls.
If the split pseudo still has the same hard register as the
-original pseudo after the subsequent assignment
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Where is mark_addressable called? It's wrong (and generally impossible) to
do that late.
In expr.c:emit_block_move_hints. It's one of the calls added to support the
enhanced DSE last year, there are others in
This fixes PR54920.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied on
trunk and the 4.7 branch.
Richard.
2012-10-15 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/54920
* tree-ssa-pre.c (create_expression_by_pieces): Properly
allocate temporary
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
The attached patch adds documentation for SH specific function
attributes which haven't been documented yet.
Tested with 'make info dvi pdf'.
OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
The attached patch adds gcc.target/sh/torture and puts the test there.
The torture subdir might be also useful in the future.
Tested on rev 192417 with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=sh-sim\{-m2/-ml}
OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
I somehow initially forgot to implement DImode GBR based loads/stores.
Attached patch does that and also fixes a problem with the GBR address
mode optimization.
Tested on rev 192417 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=sh-sim
On 05/10/12 16:52, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Hi,
This patch refactors the initialisation code for the Advanced
SIMD builtins under the AArch64 target. The patch has been
regression tested on aarch64-none-elf.
OK for aarch64-branch?
(If yes, someone will have to commit this for me as I do not
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
This one refactors some copy pasta that my previous patch regarding this
matter introduced and catches more unnecessary sign/zero extensions of T
bit stores. It also fixes the bug reported in PR 54925 which popped up
after the last patch for PR 51244.
On 10/15/2012 06:41 AM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
The following patch is still awaiting review:
2011-09-19 Jorn Rennecke joern.renne...@arc.com
* genoutput.c (process_template): Process '*' in '@' alternatives.
* doc/md.texi (node Output Statement): Provide example for the
On 09/10/12 12:08, James Greenhalgh wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds support for vcond and vcondu to the AArch64
backend.
Tested with no regressions on aarch64-none-elf.
OK for aarch64-branch?
(If so, someone will have to commit for me, as I do not
have commit rights.)
Thanks
James Greenhalgh
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
This adds the test case from the PR.
Tested together with the patch posted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01380.html
OK?
It would be better to make it a valid C program. I've checked
that the test case with the change below also
Il 15/10/2012 10:37, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
I prefer to declare the notes invalid and drop the notes.
Then, afaic, our only option is to drop them all in web, as per attached
patch.
I strongly disagree with this approach though. It destroys information
that is correct, that we had
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
if that's accurate. I dropped the term reload pseudo because of
the general comment in my earlier reply about the use of reload pseudo
when the code seems to include inheritance and split pseudos too.
There is no inheritance and splitting yet. It
[Ian, I am copying you because this is originally your code. Richard, I
am copying you because you are all things aliased :-). And Andrew is
here because I am unable to come up with a suitable test for the
simulate-thread harness.].
Here we have a store data race because
On 2012-10-14 23:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:35:27AM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tobias Schlüter
I'm putting forward two patches. One uses a C++ map to very concisely build
up and handle the ordered list of symbols. This has three
Hi Janne,
thanks for the review.
On 2012-10-14 23:35, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
- Personally, I'd prefer the C++ version; The C++ standard library is
widely used and documented and using it in favour of rolling our own
is IMHO a good idea.
- I'd be vary wrt backporting, in my experience the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I strongly disagree with this approach though. It destroys information
that is correct, that we had before DF_RD_PRUNE_DEAD_DEFS, that we can
update, and that helps with optimization. With renaming these notes
are valid, and do not refer to
Looks Ok. If David can test is successfully on AIX I can approve it.
I was able to bootstrap successfully with the patch.
Checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00581.html
Thanks, K
Hello,
While reading alias.c, it seemed to me that some comments could use
some cleanups.
OK for trunk?
Thanks.
gcc/
* alias.c: Cleanup comments.
---
gcc/alias.c | 27 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/alias.c
Il 15/10/2012 14:53, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
I think I've shown above that we're all looking at the wrong pass...
I think you have... so we want a patch like this?
Index: df-problems.c
===
--- df-problems.c (revisione
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
Il 15/10/2012 14:53, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
I think I've shown above that we're all looking at the wrong pass...
I think you have... so we want a patch like this?
I don't think so. df_kill_notes is already supposed to
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Hello,
While reading alias.c, it seemed to me that some comments could use
some cleanups.
OK for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks.
gcc/
* alias.c: Cleanup comments.
---
gcc/alias.c | 27 +--
1 file
On Oct 15, 2012, at 15:12 , Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
I was able to bootstrap successfully with the patch.
Checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00581.html
Thanks :)
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Richard Biener wrote:
else if ((code == BIT_NOT_EXPR
TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (cond)) == 1)
|| (code == BIT_XOR_EXPR
- integer_onep (gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt
+ ((gimple_assign_rhs_code
On 10/15/2012 08:28 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I am having a bit of a problem coming up with a generic testcase.
Perhaps Andrew or others have an idea.
The attached testcase fails to trigger without the patch, because
AFAICT we have no way of testing an addition of zero to a memory
This moves TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE to the bitpack section.
LTO bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-10-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* data-streamer.h (bp_pack_string_with_length): New function.
(bp_pack_string): Likewise.
On 26.06.2012 11:10, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 25/06/12 22:30, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 25.06.2012 18:21, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 25.06.2012 15:22, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 25/06/12 13:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc/config.gcc now allows matching arm*-*-linux-*eabi* instead of
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
The only versions of the Solaris assembler I have access to only support
v8plusX according to the man page. Has that changed recently?
For the older stuff I mean doing something like -m32 -xarch=v9X
OK, this is for fbe, not for as. I think
David Miller da...@davemloft.net writes:
Could one of you help me get the solaris side correct? I made sure
that binutils accepts the same options for this stuff, that's why
I can unconditionally use '-xarch=sparc4' in the configure test.
I assume this works because gas 2.22 had neither
Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't see how can their testcase be used if not converted to Dejagnu
though, most of their testcases are full of LLVM testcase markup
(// RUN, // CHECK*, etc.). So, if we import
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:00:02 +0200
The only versions of the Solaris assembler I have access to only support
v8plusX according to the man page. Has that changed recently?
For the older stuff I mean doing something like -m32 -xarch=v9X
OK,
David Miller da...@davemloft.net writes:
I'm just calling it VIS4 in GCC so that we can export intrinsics of,
for example, the cryptographic instructions at some point using the
__VIS__ version CPP tests.
...that's why I'm not sure we should invent VIS4 at this point. How is this
done on
From: Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:28:15 +0200
David Miller da...@davemloft.net writes:
Could one of you help me get the solaris side correct? I made sure
that binutils accepts the same options for this stuff, that's why
I can unconditionally use
From: Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:44:44 +0200
David Miller da...@davemloft.net writes:
I'm just calling it VIS4 in GCC so that we can export intrinsics of,
for example, the cryptographic instructions at some point using the
__VIS__ version CPP tests.
Hi,
thus, if I understand correctly the resolution of Core/468 [CD1], we can
simplify a bit the parser and just accept these 'template' outside
templates. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
/cp
2012-10-15 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR
On 15/10/12 15:20, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 26.06.2012 11:10, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 25/06/12 22:30, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 25.06.2012 18:21, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 25.06.2012 15:22, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 25/06/12 13:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc/config.gcc now allows matching
We have maintained the gupc (GNU Unified Parallel C) branch for
a couple of years now, and would like to merge these changes into
the GCC trunk.
It is our goal to integrate the GUPC changes into the GCC 4.8
trunk, in order to provide a UPC (Unified Parallel C) capability
in the subsequent GCC 4.8
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Gary Funck g...@intrepid.com wrote:
We have maintained the gupc (GNU Unified Parallel C) branch for
a couple of years now, and would like to merge these changes into
the GCC trunk.
It is our goal to integrate the GUPC changes into the GCC 4.8
trunk, in order
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Michael Meissner wrote:
I decided to see if it was possible to simplify the change over by adding
another flag word in the .opt handling to give the old names (TARGET_xxx and
MASK_xxx). For Joseph Myers and Neil Booth, the issue is when changing all
of the switches that
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't see how can their testcase be used if not converted to Dejagnu
though, most of their
Ping^2. This patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01907.html (non-C parts) is
still pending review.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On 10/15/12 17:51:14, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Gary Funck g...@intrepid.com wrote:
[...]
UPC-Related Front-End Changes
-
GCC's internal tree representation is
extended to record the UPC shared,
strict, relaxed qualifiers,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
In my opinion, supporting the full range of GCC testsuite annotations
means imposing a lot of mechanism that the Go testsuite does not
require. It would complicate the Go testsuite for no benefit.
Anybody who can
OK.
Jason
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:52:01PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Michael Meissner wrote:
I decided to see if it was possible to simplify the change over by adding
another flag word in the .opt handling to give the old names (TARGET_xxx
and
MASK_xxx). For Joseph
Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
I was wondering if the i386 port maintainers could have a look at this
pattern. Shouldn't we really have two patterns, one to *load* an unaligned
value and one to *store* and unaligned value, and
Hello,
GCC has hard_reg_set_iterator to iterate quickly over a HARD_REG_SET,
but it's not used a lot. Attached patch makes a few files use it to
iterate over regs_invalidated_by_call. If this is OK, I'd like to
convert loops over HARD_REG_SETs to iterators where possible.
Bootstrappedtested on
Hi Vlad,
Some comments about the rest of LRA. Nothing major here...
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
+/* Info about register in an insn. */
+struct lra_insn_reg
+{
+ /* The biggest mode through which the insn refers to the register
+ (remember the register can be accessed
Cilk Plus branch was merged with trunk at revision 192446. Committed as
revision 192464.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Gary Funck wrote:
Various UPC language related checks and operations
are called in the C front-end and middle-end.
To insure that these operations are defined,
when linked with the other language front-ends
and compilers, these functions are stub-ed,
in a fashion
This fixes an issue where we were generating an SBFIZ with
operand 3 outside of the valid range (as determined by the
size of the destination register and the amount of shift).
My patch checks that the range is valid before allowing
the pattern to be used.
This has now had full regression
Tobias == Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de writes:
Tobias Build on x86-64-linux with C/C++/Fortran. I will now do an
Tobias all-language build/regtest.
Tobias OK when it passes?
Tobias 2012-10-03 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
Tobias * files.c (read_file_guts, _cpp_save_file_entries):
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
I was wondering if the i386 port maintainers could have a look at this
pattern. Shouldn't we really have two patterns, one to *load* an
Actually, let's keep the diagnostic when compiling with -pedantic in 98
mode.
Jason
After committing a patch yesterday to implement proposals from a
review, I found that GCC crashes on SPEC2000 gap. LRA is trying to find
a mode of operand (const_int 1) in *lea_general_1 insn and can not find
it as the operand and insn template operand has VOIDmode.
There are still cases
On 10/05/2012 10:38 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/05/2012 04:29 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Or if we have the extra indirection via a reference anyway, we could
have a pointer TLS variable (NULL initialized) that on the first access
will trap where in a trap handler we could then perform
On 2012-10-14 23:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:35:27AM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tobias Schlüter
I'm putting forward two patches. One uses a C++ map to very concisely build
up and handle the ordered list of symbols. This has three
])
(expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
(nil))
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.8.0 20121015 (experimental) [trunk revision 192447] (x86_64-pc-mingw32)
GCC error:|
| in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2124
The problem
OK.
Jason
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This extends the lifetime of the hard register up to the beginning of the
function, causing reload to die on the complex division instruction.
Does this still happen after my patch from yesterday to use DF_LIVE in IRA?
The attached patch
Hi,
since the sizetype change, we generate invalid Ada for flexible array members
with -fdump-ada-spec in C++. The attached patch fixes this issue and also
partially revamps the code to polish some rough edges.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for mainline?
2012-10-15 Eric Botcazou
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hello,
GCC has hard_reg_set_iterator to iterate quickly over a HARD_REG_SET,
but it's not used a lot. Attached patch makes a few files use it to
iterate over regs_invalidated_by_call. If this is OK, I'd like to
convert loops over
On 10/15/2012 07:30 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Actually, let's keep the diagnostic when compiling with -pedantic in
98 mode.
... too late! ;) So I prepared the below, I'm finishing testing it.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/cp
2012-10-15 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR
On 10/15/2012 11:33 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ pedantic cxx_dialect == cxx98)
+ {
+ cp_token *token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser-lexer);
+ error_at (token-location,
+ in C++98 %template% (as a disambiguator) is only
+ allowed
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
Index: optabs.c
===
--- optabs.c(revision 191879)
+++ optabs.c(working copy)
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode, rtx x, int
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
I was wondering if the i386 port maintainers could have a look at this
pattern. Shouldn't we really have two patterns, one to *load* an unaligned
value and one to *store* and unaligned value, and not permit that
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
* combine.c (record_dead_and_set_regs): Iterate over hard register set
with a hard_reg_set_iterator.
* cse.c (invalidate_for_call): Likewise.
* gcse.c (compute_hash_table_work): Likewise.
* loop-iv.c
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
After committing a patch yesterday to implement proposals from a
review, I found that GCC crashes on SPEC2000 gap. LRA is trying to find
a mode of operand (const_int 1) in *lea_general_1 insn and can not find
it as the operand and insn
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 The following tests:
g++.dg/gomp/tls-5.C
g++.dg/tls/thread_local-cse.C
g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order*.C
g++.dg/tls/thread_local*g.C
fail with
sorry, unimplemented: dynamic initialization of non-function-local
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
2012-10-04 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* final.c (get_attr_length_1): Use direct recursion rather than
calling get_attr_length.
(get_attr_lock_length): New function.
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
After committing a patch yesterday to implement proposals from a
review, I found that GCC crashes on SPEC2000 gap. LRA is trying to find
a mode of operand (const_int 1) in *lea_general_1
On 10/15/12 17:06:28, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Gary Funck wrote:
Various UPC language related checks and operations
are called in the C front-end and middle-end.
To insure that these operations are defined,
when linked with the other language front-ends
and compilers,
Hi,
On 2012-10-14 23:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:35:27AM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tobias Schlüter
I'm putting forward two patches. One uses a C++ map to very concisely build
up and handle the ordered list of symbols. This has
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:44:12PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Revised patch to address conservative behavior in redundant extend
elimination that was resulting in redundant extends not being
removed. Now uses a new target
Attached, patch 01 of 16.
These are configure and 'make' related changes
that introduce UPC support into GCC.
As noted previously, these changes build the UPC front-end
as a 'cc1upc' binary in a fashion similar to Objective C.
There are also specific ABI adjustments made for passing
UPC
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Hi,
since the sizetype change, we generate invalid Ada for flexible array members
with -fdump-ada-spec in C++. The attached patch fixes this issue and also
partially revamps the code to polish some rough edges.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
