On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Jason Merrill wrote:
Although __int128_t is technically not an extended integer type because we
don't want to change intmax_t, it seems appropriate to me to give it the same
semantics as an extended integer type apart from that one aspect.
The only thing we weren't
On 02/13/2013 01:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I just noticed this patch. Since it was submitted well before the end
of stage 3 and looks quite safe, it's OK to go in for 4.8. Please
remember to CC/ping me for C++ patches.
Thanks,
Jason
Applied the following after build and test on
cp_parser_member_declaration was seeing that the type-specifier in the
declaration had function type and concluded from that that the
declaration would have function type, without noticing that the
declarator isn't a simple identifier. We should check that.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
Is it OK for wwdocs?
Index: gcc-4.8/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.96 changes.html
--- gcc-4.8/changes.html12 Feb 2013 16:33:58 - 1.96
Hi,
Please consider this as a reminder to review the patch posted at
following link:-
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg01374.html
The patch is slightly modified to use CC_NZ mode instead of CC.
Please review the patch and let me know if its okay?
Thanks Regards,
Naveen.H.S
---
Hi,
Please consider this as a gentle reminder to review the patch
posted at following link:-
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg01412.html
Please review the patch and let me know if its okay?
Thanks Regards,
Naveen.H.S
Hi,
Please consider this as a gentle reminder to review the patch
posted at following link:-
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00823.html
Please review the patch and let me know if its okay?
Thanks Regards,
Naveen.H.S
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo