2014-09-19 23:45 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 09/16/14 03:09, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I must be misunderstanding something then. I fundamentally don't see how
the return bounds are any different here than the return value. If we
have
exposed the bounds in the IL, then aren't they
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/19/14 01:23, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/18/14 04:07, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This series is a cleaned-up version of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-03/msg00163.html
The underlying problem is that the
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/18/14 04:25, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This is the main patch for the bug. We should treat a register as invalid
for a mode change if simplify_subreg_regno cannot provide a new register
number for the result. We should treat a class as invalid for a mode
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Please omit static from inline functions.
Yep, I suppose we want to drop static in all inlines? I can make patch for
that.
Also one notable difference with your patches is that the fits hwi is now
not tested on the result but on the result
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 08:40:01PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 2014-09-18 11:19:21 +0100, James Greenhalgh
james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01334.html
The construct
(clobber (match_scratch 0 r))
is
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
The following adds the ability to write predicates using patterns
with an example following negate_expr_p which already has a
use in comparison folding (via its if c-expr).
The syntax is as follows:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch renames types reported by Wodr during LTO bootstrap.
Bootrapping/regtesting in progress, OK if it passes?
Honza
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (prop_value_d): Rename to ...
(ccp_prop_value_t): ... this one to avoid ODR violation;
Richard,
here is reduced patch (part.1) which was reduced almost twice.
Let's me also answer on your comments.
1. I really use edge field 'aux' to keep predicate for critical edges.
My previous code was not correct and now it looks like:
if (EDGE_COUNT (b-succs) == 1 || EDGE_COUNT
On 09/21/14 18:58, Xinliang David Li wrote:
the intent is that that points to the gcov_info object of the object file
containing the live version of the function. I couldn't quite get this to
work though -- it involves emitting a function's gcov_fn_info decl in the
same comdat group as the
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 01:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
This one isn't a wrong-code issue, just a missed optimization. The
strlen
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 09/12/2014 10:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
I strongly disagree. It's the same as for any other integer - there's one
sign bit, and
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/14 13:01, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This fixes an issue on ptx where we fail to output a declaration for a
variable. The testcase is c-torture/compile/pr34856.c, and the cause of
the problem is that the variable g is never
On Sat, Sep 20 2014, Mark Wielaard wrote:
When adding DW_TAG_restrict_type I made a mistake when updating the
code that handled types with multiple modifiers. This patch fixes it
by putting the logic for finding the sub-qualified type in a separate
function and fall back to adding the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/14 13:01, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This fixes an issue on ptx where we fail to output a declaration for a
variable. The testcase is
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
This series is a cleaned-up version of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-03/msg00163.html
The underlying problem is that the semantics of subregs depend on the
word size. You can't have a subreg for byte
On Mon, 2014-09-22 08:58:34 +0100, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 08:40:01PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
My build robot shows a new build error, which I guess is
caused/uncovered by your genrecog change on bfin-elf (see eg. build
On 09/22/2014 11:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
It seems to me that walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops is called on
bogus input. The function is supposed to be called on GIMPLE
stmts and in GIMPLE stmts CONSTRUCTORs may _not_ have
conversions in their elements.
Please revert if you have applied
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/14 13:01, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This fixes an issue
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 09/22/2014 11:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
It seems to me that walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops is called on
bogus input. The function is supposed to be called on GIMPLE
stmts and in GIMPLE stmts CONSTRUCTORs may
On 09/19/2014 11:32 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
As with the earlier patch for sh
( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01627.html ), this fixes the
fallout caused by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01615.html.
These are build failures, and the fixes are obvious, but I
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:21:25PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Old GDB might show short and long as short int and long int. This made
gcc.dg/guality/const-volatile.c ans restrict.c fail on older GDBs.
According to the patch that changed this in newer versions of GDB
this was a bug:
On 19/09/14 17:19, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/19/14 10:02, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 19/09/14 16:49, Jeff Law wrote:
Probably. Though I'd be a bit concerned with next_block-next_bb.
Wouldn't it be safer to stash away the relevant basic block prior to the
call to split_edge, then use that saved copy.
On 19/09/14 21:43, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/15/14 08:33, Jiong Wang wrote:
Jeff,
thanks, I partially understand your meaning here.
take the function ira_implicitly_set_insn_hard_regs in ira-lives.c
for example,
when generating address rtl, gcc will automatically generate const
Le 21 sept. 2014 à 10:44, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com a écrit :
AFAICT the lines 11200-11222 in gcc/fortran/resolve.c are a copy of
the lines 11176-11198.
The duplicates were introduced by revision 126468, an unrelated patch, after
the original commit of the code as 126466. It looks like a
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This fixes PR/61114 by redefining the REDUC_{MIN,MAX,PLUS}_EXPR tree codes.
These are presently documented as producing a vector with the result in
element 0, and this is inconsistent with their use in tree-vect-loop.c
Hi!
Obviously, it is a bad idea to emit gimple assign stmts for temporaries
needed by debug stmts, we have to emit debug temporaries instead, otherwise
we generate different code between -g0 and -g.
Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk/4.9.
2014-09-22 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
These match their corresponding tree codes, by taking a vector and returning
a scalar; this is more architecturally neutral than the (somewhat loosely
defined) previous optab that took a vector and returned a vector
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
For reduction operations (e.g. multiply) that don't have such a tree code
,or where the target platform doesn't define an optab handler for the tree
code, we can perform the reduction using a series of log(N) shifts
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
These are like the previous patch, but using | rather than * - I was unable
to get the previous test to pass on PowerPC and MIPS.
I note there is no inherent vector operation here - a bitwise OR across a
word, and a
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Sandiford
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 12:54 PM
To: Jeff Law
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix handling of word subregs of wide registers
Jeff
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR is only ever used by the vectorizer in tree-vect-loop.c
(vect_create_epilog_for_reduction), to shift the vector by a whole number of
elements. The tree code allows more general shifts but only for
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The previous patch broke aarch64_be by redefining VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR /
vec_shr_optab to always shift the vector towards gcc's element 0. This fixes
aarch64_be to do that.
check-gcc on aarch64-none-elf (no changes) and
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The VEC_LSHIFT_EXPR tree code, and the corresponding vec_shl_optab, seem to
have been added for completeness, providing a counterpart to VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR
and vec_shr_optab. However, whereas VEC_RSHIFT_EXPRs are generated
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Following earlier patches, vect_create_epilog_for_reduction contains exactly
one case where extract_scalar_result==true. Hence, move the code 'if
(extract_scalar_result)' there, and tidy-up/remove some variables.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The direction of VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR has been endian-dependent, contrary to the
general principles of tree. This patch updates fold-const and the vectorizer
(the only place where such expressions are created), such that
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Uros Bizjak wrote:
OK for mainline and release branches.
I've omitted ia64 from the targets in the testcase in the release branch
version, given the lack of any
Well, I haven't looked into this in detail: I've gone only as far as
* swapping emit-rtl.o between 'good' compiles (svn r214042) and 'bad'
compiles (r214043), finding that the critical difference is in the emit-rtl.o
generated by r214043;
*looking at the relocations in the 'bad' emit_rtl.o,
Ok thanks Jeff. In that case I think I should draw this to the attention of the
AArch64 maintainers to check the testsuite updates are OK before I commit...?
Methinks it may be possible to get further, or at least increase our confidence,
if I mock out try_widen_shift_mode, and/or try
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Well, I haven't looked into this in detail: I've gone only as far as
* swapping emit-rtl.o between 'good' compiles (svn r214042) and 'bad'
compiles (r214043), finding that the critical difference is in the
emit-rtl.o
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The end goal here is to remove this code from tree-vect-loop.c
(vect_create_epilog_for_reduction):
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
bitpos = size_binop (MULT_EXPR,
bitsize_int
Ajit Kumar Agarwal ajit.kumar.agar...@xilinx.com writes:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/19/14 01:23, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/18/14 04:07, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This series is a cleaned-up version of:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The end goal here is to remove this code from tree-vect-loop.c
(vect_create_epilog_for_reduction):
if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
This series is a cleaned-up version of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-03/msg00163.html
The underlying problem is that the semantics of subregs depend on the
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:58:57PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:46:22PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
2014-05-21 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR sanitizer/61272
* ubsan.c (is_ubsan_builtin_p): Turn assert into a condition.
*
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:56 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: Jeff Law; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix handling of word subregs of wide registers
Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Based on discussion on the mspgcc-users mailing list[1], this patch
changes msp430 to not automatically apply -lnosys when -msim is absent,
as this prevents a user from supplying a custom system interface.
The existing behavior providing the CIO alternative can be obtained by
explicitly linking
The following fixes non-GIMPLE constructors slipping through the
gimplifier.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-09-22 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* gimplify.c (gimplify_init_constructor): Do not leave
non-GIMPLE vector
Richard Biener wrote:
Huh. Does that ever happen? Please use a NOP_EXPR instead of
a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR.
Yes, the testcase is gcc.target/i386/pr51235.c which performs black magic***
with void *. (This testcase otherwise fails the verify_gimple_assign_unary check
in tree-cfg.c .) However,
Richard Biener wrote:
scalar_reduc_to_vector misses a comment.
Ok to reuse the comment in optabs.h in optabs.c also?
I wonder if at the end we wouldn't transition all backends and then
renaming reduc_*_scal_optab back to reduc_*_optab makes sense.
Yes, that sounds like a plan, the _scal
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 09:12 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
The direction of VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR has been endian-dependent, contrary to the
general principles of tree. This patch updates fold-const and the vectorizer
(the
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:12:15AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 18/09/14 10:53, James Greenhalgh wrote:
+$(srcdir)/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtin-iterators.h:
$(srcdir)/config/aarch64/geniterators.sh \
+ $(srcdir)/config/aarch64/iterators.md
+ $(SHELL)
This adds move and swap functions to the iostream classes.
Although this is a pretty large patch, it's a pure addition that only
affects C++11 mode, and should have no effect on existing code because
it won't be moving or swapping streams.
I wanted to use C++14's std::exchange so I added
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
scalar_reduc_to_vector misses a comment.
Ok to reuse the comment in optabs.h in optabs.c also?
Sure.
I wonder if at the end we wouldn't transition all backends and then
renaming
Hi!
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:30:49 +, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com
wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawning_arg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* arm*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-options -fcilkplus } */
+/* {
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Michael, I really don't understand the need for this change in your original
patch. I don't know if this was a temporary testing change or what.
I'm pretty sure it was temporary testing, when I still was finding my way
through dwarf2out
Hi,
I find that update_equiv_regs in ira.c sets the wrong EQUIV
reg-note for pseudo with more than one definiton in certain situation.
Here is a simplified RTL snippet after this function finishs handling:
(insn 77 37 78 2 (set (reg:SI 171)
(const_int 0 [0])) ticket151.c:33 52
On 09/21/14 21:10, Chen Gang wrote:
On 9/22/14 2:09, Michael Eager wrote:
Generally, you should use gcc to link programs, not ld. gcc is
a driver which will select the appropriate libraries and support routines
(such as crt0.o, which contains _start) and pass them to the linker.
OK,
On 09/21/14 20:55, Chen Gang wrote:
On 9/22/14 2:03, Michael Eager wrote:
On 09/20/14 23:24, Chen Gang wrote:
And it seems, we also need 'LinkScr.ld' for ldscript, could you share it
to me, thanks.
set_board_info ldscript -T/home/eager/Xilinx/dg/microblaze_0/LinkScr.ld
Hi Chen --
The
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Andrew Dixie wrote:
I altered the dwarf2 frame and exception table generation so the
decision on whether to use a read-only or read-write section is an
independent decision from how the frame tables are registered.
I renamed EH_FRAME_IN_DATA_SECTION to
When I fixed std::try_lock a few years ago I misread the spec,
exceptions should not be caught and turned into a return value.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 5effca670aa009c60e31b639604da4d00f388038
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Sep 18 16:15:54 2014
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org wrote:
On 09/21/14 18:58, Xinliang David Li wrote:
the intent is that that points to the gcov_info object of the object file
containing the live version of the function. I couldn't quite get this
to
work though -- it involves
On 09/12/2014 08:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I've been worried about the quick cases where
parallelization is not beneficial, like make check-gcc \
RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=pr60123.c or similar, but one doesn't usually pass -jN
in that case.
I have -jN in my $MAKEFLAGS, so I've been running into
This documents some more C++11 features as incomplete and notes that
iostreams are movable now.
Committed to trunk.
commit 8de61687f31c20aec35c02393c4fbb44ddcc0cbb
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Sep 22 15:57:28 2014 +0100
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Update
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21:14AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/12/2014 08:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I've been worried about the quick cases where
parallelization is not beneficial, like make check-gcc \
RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=pr60123.c or similar, but one doesn't usually pass -jN
in that
On 19 Sep 18:21, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds i386 target hooks for Pointer Bounds Checker.
New version with fixes and better documentation for ix86_load_bounds and
ix86_store_bounds is below.
+/*
On 21 Sep 18:08, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
This patch introduces initialization of incoming bounds for vararg function
on i386 target.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
*
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes ICE by avoiding mangling of types with variadic size
(those are
not really supported). Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, tested with
libreoffice,
comitted.
Hmm, but how do global vars end
On 17 Sep 12:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 19 May 11:23, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/19/14 02:19, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 16 May 13:39, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/16/14 05:35, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch introduces Intel MPX bound registers and instructions. It
was approved earlier
On 09/22/2014 11:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21:14AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
If I say 'rgt dg.exp=var-templ1.C' the actual test results are lost in the
explosion of shell verbosity. Could we add some '@'s to more of the rules,
perhaps?
I've been considering
On 09/22/14 08:17, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Michael, I really don't understand the need for this change in your original
patch. I don't know if this was a temporary testing change or what.
I'm pretty sure it was temporary testing, when I still was
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I've been considering that too, but not sure what info people find valuable
and what they don't.
The ten million Running blablablalba.exp ... messages on a very parallel
run aren't helpful in my opinion. There might be more but
Hi Peter,
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-09-22 Peter A. Bigot p...@pabigot.com
* config/msp430/msp430.h: Remove automatic -lnosys when -msim absent.
Approved and applied.
Cheers
Nick
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
test-case need to be added with more live ranges for the need for the
LR_REGNUM. i.e test-case in the PR needs
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:44:06AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I've been considering that too, but not sure what info people find valuable
and what they don't.
The ten million Running blablablalba.exp ... messages on a
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Please omit static from inline functions.
Yep, I suppose we want to drop static in all inlines? I can make patch for
that.
Also one notable difference with your patches is that the fits hwi is now
not tested on the result but on
On 09/22/2014 10:45 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
On 09/21/14 21:10, Chen Gang wrote:
On 9/22/14 2:09, Michael Eager wrote:
Generally, you should use gcc to link programs, not ld. gcc is
a driver which will select the appropriate libraries and support routines
(such as crt0.o, which contains
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:43:35AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/22/2014 11:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21:14AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
If I say 'rgt dg.exp=var-templ1.C' the actual test results are lost in the
explosion of shell verbosity. Could we add some
On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
test-case need to be added with more live ranges for the need for the
LR_REGNUM. i.e
On 09/22/2014 10:46 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
On 09/21/14 20:55, Chen Gang wrote:
On 9/22/14 2:03, Michael Eager wrote:
On 09/20/14 23:24, Chen Gang wrote:
And it seems, we also need 'LinkScr.ld' for ldscript, could you share it
to me, thanks.
set_board_info ldscript
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit
As before, an HTML version of the docs can be seen at:
https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/libgccjit-api-docs/index.html
with the bulk of the changes occurring to:
https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/libgccjit-api-docs/intro/tutorial03.html
On 22/09/14 14:30, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:12:15AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 18/09/14 10:53, James Greenhalgh wrote:
+$(srcdir)/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtin-iterators.h:
$(srcdir)/config/aarch64/geniterators.sh \
+
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:49:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:44:06AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I've been considering that too, but not sure what info people find
valuable
and what they
On 09/22/2014 11:58 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
LGTM (though, supposedly we want similar change in
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/Makefile.am).
Or, if people would really like to see the commands, we could print them
just once, using e.g.
-$(if $(check_p_subno),@)(rootme= ...
(then e.g.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:21:08PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/22/2014 11:58 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
LGTM (though, supposedly we want similar change in
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/Makefile.am).
Or, if people would really like to see the commands, we could print them
just once, using e.g.
After being reminded of the tm.h issues brought up last november (here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01731.html ), I started
looking back into it.
The general summary is the any header file which has a conditional on a
target macro could be affected by include file
On 09/22/2014 11:37 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Variadic types indeed can not appear in global declarations, so I think it is
safe to ignore them.
Agreed.
Jason
On 09/22/14 01:34, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/18/14 04:25, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This is the main patch for the bug. We should treat a register as invalid
for a mode change if simplify_subreg_regno cannot provide a new register
number for the result.
This patch fixes two issues with variable templates:
1) -Wunused was warning about a variable template specialization when
leaving the template specialization scope, and
2) The diagnostic referring to the specialization wasn't showing the
template arguments.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
Include missing header, and add tests.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit a0ffb1d4d0bf78be525c7546665ef7002b66b13e
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Sep 22 16:42:51 2014 +0100
Include bits/uses_allocator.h in stack and queue.
*
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 12:26 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
After being reminded of the tm.h issues brought up last november (here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01731.html ), I started
looking back into it.
The general summary is the any header file which has a conditional
On 09/22/14 05:16, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Ok thanks Jeff. In that case I think I should draw this to the attention
of the AArch64 maintainers to check the testsuite updates are OK before
I commit...?
Can't hurt.
Methinks it may be possible to get further, or at least increase our
confidence,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Josephs solution was to identify these and instead put a default definition in
default.h ... then change all the uses to #if instead.. ie,
#if BLAH
This way we can ensure that the definition has been seen and it will be a
compile error if not.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
There appears to be a particular implicit order in which headers must be
included. I notice that e.g. tm.h has:
#ifndef GCC_TM_H
#define GCC_TM_H
so if we're going with this no header file includes any other header
file model, would it make
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Well, I haven't looked into this in detail: I've gone only as far as
* swapping emit-rtl.o between 'good' compiles (svn r214042) and 'bad'
compiles (r214043), finding that the critical difference is in the
emit-rtl.o
On 09/22/14 04:24, Jiong Wang wrote:
Great. Can you send an updated patchkit for review.
patch attached.
please review, thanks.
gcc/ * shrink-wrap.c (move_insn_for_shrink_wrap): Initialize the
live-in of new created BB as the intersection of live-in from
old_dest and live-out from bb.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Please omit static from inline functions.
Yep, I suppose we want to drop static in all inlines? I can make patch
for that.
Also one notable difference with your patches is that the fits hwi is
now not tested on the
On 09/22/14 04:29, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 19/09/14 21:43, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/15/14 08:33, Jiong Wang wrote:
Jeff,
thanks, I partially understand your meaning here.
take the function ira_implicitly_set_insn_hard_regs in ira-lives.c
for example,
when generating address rtl, gcc
On Sep 22, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Please omit static from inline functions.
Yep, I suppose we want to drop static in all inlines? I can make patch for
that.
Also one notable difference with your patches is that the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org wrote:
On 09/21/14 18:58, Xinliang David Li wrote:
the intent is that that points to the gcov_info object of the object file
containing the live version of the function. I couldn't quite get this
to
work though -- it involves
On 09/21/14 06:34, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an updated version of this patch.
@@ -25000,10 +25082,32 @@ ix86_expand_call (rtx retval, rtx fnaddr, rtx
callarg1,
}
call = gen_rtx_CALL (VOIDmode, fnaddr,
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
