Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement N4387 and LWG 2367

2015-06-08 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 8 June 2015 at 18:53, Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilai...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 June 2015 at 18:37, Martin Sebor mse...@redhat.com wrote: In the hunk below, should the sizes_match template parameter be privatized (since it isn't part of the public interface)? Or perhaps even removed if it's

Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement N4387 and LWG 2367

2015-06-08 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 8 June 2015 at 18:37, Martin Sebor mse...@redhat.com wrote: In the hunk below, should the sizes_match template parameter be privatized (since it isn't part of the public interface)? Or perhaps even removed if it's not used? Yes, it should be uglified, thanks.

<    1   2