Re: [RFC] Don't move cold code out of loop by checking bb count

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 3:56 AM Xionghu Luo wrote: > > > > On 2021/8/26 19:33, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 4:03 AM Xionghu Luo wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2021/8/6 20:15, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 7:05 AM Xiong Hu Luo wrote: > >

Re: [Patch] Fortran: Improve -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings [PR55534]

Hi Tobias! On 2021-09-21T21:22:44+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > While the previous patch fixed -Wno-missing-include-dirs and sorted > out some inconsistencies with libcpp warnings, it had two issues: > > * Some superfluous warnings were printed, e.g. for > gfortran nonexisting/file.f90 >

Re: [PATCH][GCC] arm: Enable Cortex-R52+ CPU

This is OK Ramana On 22/09/2021, 09:45, "Przemyslaw Wirkus" wrote: Patch is adding Cortex-R52+ as 'cortex-r52plus' command line flag for -mcpu option. See: https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/cortex-r/cortex-r52-plus OK for master? gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-22

[PATCH][GCC] arm: Add Cortex-R52+ multilib

Patch is adding multilib entries for `cortex-r52plus` CPU. See: https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/cortex-r/cortex-r52-plus OK for master? gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-16 Przemyslaw Wirkus * config/arm/t-rtems: Add "-mthumb -mcpu=cortex-r52plus -mfloat-abi=hard"

[PATCH][GCC] arm: Enable Cortex-R52+ CPU

Patch is adding Cortex-R52+ as 'cortex-r52plus' command line flag for -mcpu option. See: https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-cpu/cortex-r/cortex-r52-plus OK for master? gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-22 Przemyslaw Wirkus * config/arm/arm-cpus.in: Add Cortex-R52+ CPU. *

Re: [PATCH] Fix loop split incorrect count and probability

On 2021/8/11 17:16, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote: On 2021/8/10 22:47, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote: Thanks, On 2021/8/6 19:46, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote: loop split condition is moved

[PATCH][GCC] aarch64: enable cortex-x2 CPU

Patch is adding 'cortex-x2' to -mcpu command line option. OK for master? gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-02 Przemyslaw Wirkus * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def (AARCH64_CORE): New Cortex-X2 core. * config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerate. * doc/invoke.texi: Update

[PATCH][GCC] aarch64: enable cortex-a710 CPU

Patch is adding 'cortex-a710' to -mcpu command line option. gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-02 Przemyslaw Wirkus * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def (AARCH64_CORE): New Cortex-A710 core. * config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerate. * doc/invoke.texi: Update docs.

[PATCH][GCC] aarch64: enable cortex-a510 CPU

Patch is adding 'cortex-a510' to -mcpu command line option. gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-02 Przemyslaw Wirkus * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def (AARCH64_CORE): New Cortex-A510 core. * config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerate. * doc/invoke.texi: Update docs.

[PATCH][GCC] aarch64: add armv9-a to -march

Patch is adding new command line option 'armv9-a' to -march. OK for master? gcc/ChangeLog: 2021-09-22 Przemyslaw Wirkus * config/aarch64/aarch64-arches.def (AARCH64_ARCH): Added armv9-a. * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (AARCH64_FL_V9): New. (AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH9):

Re: [COMMITTED] Use EDGE_EXECUTABLE in ranger and return UNDEFINED for those edges.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > On 9/21/21 9:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 2:57 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote: > >> On 9/21/21 2:14 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:09 AM Richard Biener > >>> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21,

Re: [PATCH 2/7] Do not query SCEV in range_of_phi unless dominators are available.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 7:17 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > On 9/21/21 7:05 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > On 9/21/21 12:53 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > >> SCEV won't work without dominators and we can get called without > >> dominators from debug_ranger. > >> > >> Another option

[Committed] IBM Z: Fix PR102222

Avoid emitting a strict low part move if the insv target actually affects the whole target reg. Bootstrapped and regression tested on s390x. gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/10 * config/s390/s390.c (s390_expand_insv): Emit a normal move if it is actually a full copy of the

[committed] openmp: Fix OpenMP expansion of scope with non-fallthrugh body [PR102415]

Hi! I've used function for omp single expansion also for omp scope. That is mostly ok, but as the testcase shows, there is one important difference. The omp single expansion always has a fallthru body, because it during omp lowering expands the body as if wrapped in an if to simulate that one

[committed] openmp: Add support for allocator and align modifiers on allocate clauses

Hi! As the allocate-2.c testcase shows, this change isn't 100% backwards compatible, one could have allocate and/or align functions that return an OpenMP allocator handle and previously it would call those functions and now would use those names as keywords for the modifiers. But it allows

Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] Initial support for AVX512FP16

Hi Joseph, Thomas, > On 21 Sep 2021, at 21:11, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, Iain Sandoe wrote: > >> given that: >> >> a) this fixes Darwin x86-64 bootstrap which has been broken for more than 24h >> b) the patch is now Darwin-local. > > Actually, it's not Darwin-local. It

[pushed] libgcc, X86: Adjust guard for Mach-O code.

Hi, Existing code in the sfp-machine header has been using __MACH__ as a guard for Mach-O, where currently symbols aliases are not supported. __MACH__ is not a sufficient guard for this, since the define is also emitted for HURD, at least. Fixed by amending the guard to use __APPLE__ instead.

PING^2 [PATCH, rs6000] Disable gimple fold for float or double vec_minmax when fast-math is not set

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578162.html Thanks On 6/9/2021 下午 2:01, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578162.html Thanks On 26/8/2021 上午 9:19, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: Hi

PING^1 [PATCH, rs6000] Optimization for vec_xl_sext

Hi,   Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579434.html Thanks On 15/9/2021 下午 3:35, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: Bill,     Yes, I built the gcc with p10 binutils. Then power10_ok tests can pass. Thanks again for your kindly explanation.     I finally realized

Re: [PATCH 1/3][vect] Add main vectorized loop unrolling

On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > Hi Richi, > > Thanks for the review, see below some questions. > > On 21/09/2021 13:30, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This patch adds the ability to define a target hook to

Re: [PATCH] Support 64bit fma/fms/fnma/fnms under avx512vl.

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 7:09 AM liuhongt wrote: > > Hi: > fma/fms/fnma/fnmsv2sf4 are defined only under (TARGET_FMA || TARGET_FMA4). > The patch extend the expanders to TARGET_AVX512VL. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}. > Ok for trunk? > > gcc/ChangeLog: > >

<    1   2