in this thread: just returning zero bounds for void
vars. The standard does not specify that size anyways. What do you
think?
Alexander
2017-05-11 20:37 GMT+02:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2017-05-11 0:05 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>>
ue;
}
..here the TREE_TYPE(arg)==void. Any ideas for a good workaround ?
Alexander
2017-04-08 21:59 GMT+02:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2017-04-04 18:34 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com>:
>> On 04/04/2017 09:07 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Here is the latest version of the patch with all comments addressed:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-05-09 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_get_hard_register_var_fake_base_address):
New function.
(chkp_get_hard_register_fake_addr_expr):
Hi,
I'm trying to fix the problem with function multiversioning and MPX
instrumentation (PR79765) and I face several issues. I would
appreciate your advice:
The first problem that arises is that multiversioning tries to make
versions out of thunks, which do not have bodies. This is fixed with
:
> 2017-04-20 12:27 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> Thanks for correcting the usage of get_base_address. I fixed that.
>> Plus addressed the comment about the avoiding the usage of
>> chkp_find_bounds.
>>
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/Change
Hi Ilya,
The patch below is basically what Richard proposed in Bugzilla. This
approach should produce the correct code for any address spaces,
because it will just strip the address space part of the pointer in
all bnd* instructions; Since we will do that consistently, all checks
should be
Thanks for correcting the usage of get_base_address. I fixed that.
Plus addressed the comment about the avoiding the usage of
chkp_find_bounds.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-04-20 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivche...@intel.com>
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/hard-reg-2-lbv.c: Ne
Hi,
Thanks for the comments, that was a good idea to place all the logic inside
of chkp_build_addr_expr function. I followed it and here is what I got:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-04-19 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/hard-reg-2-lbv.c: Ne
t OK?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-04-04 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_get_bounds_for_decl_addr):
assigning zero bounds to void variables
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-04-04 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/PR7
(ptr_src, iter);
else
bounds = chkp_get_nonpointer_load_bounds ();
break;
@@ -4031,7 +4065,19 @@ chkp_process_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *iter, tree node,
addr_first,
byte_position (field));
}
-else
+else if (VAR_P (ptr) && D
Hi,
The patch below attempts to fix the PR. I checked that it did not
break any of mpx.exp tests, but I did not run the full testing yet.
Would like to know whether this approach is generally correct or not.
The issue is that we have the hard reg vector variable:
typedef int U __attribute__
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for noticing that. Of course the declaration had to be in the
header for this case
Alexander
2017-01-30 13:13 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:15:01PM +0300, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>> Submitted as r243928
Committed as r243942 with the ChangeLog entries
thanks,
Alexander
2016-12-23 21:48 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> ChangeLog? Otherwise OK.
>
> Ilya
>
> 2016-12-23 14:02 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>>
Committed as r243936.
Thank you,
Alexander
2016-12-22 2:47 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2016-12-21 22:18 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> Right.. here is this updated chunk (otherwise no difference in the patch)
>>
>> d
Submitted as r243928.
Thank you
2016-12-08 20:22 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2016-12-08 12:21 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> I've tested the patch on MPX HW, no new regressions. Attached the
>> final version below,
Committed as r243927.
Thanks,
Alexander
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 2e35b01..8b2c94d 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-12-26 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivche...@intel.com>
+
+ * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
+
2016
Hi Ilya,
Would that patch be OK to submit? (it is HJ's one with added testcase)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/memcpy-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/memcpy-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..1691348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/memcpy-1.c
@@
(field)
|| TREE_CODE (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (field)) == INTEGER_CST)
&& (!DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field)
2016-12-21 21:00 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2016-12-20 17:44 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> 2016-11-26 0:28 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovic
2016-11-26 0:28 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2016-11-25 15:47 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch below addresses PR68270. could you please take a look?
>>
>> 2016-11-25 Alexander Ivchenko
I've tested the patch on MPX HW, no new regressions. Attached the
final version below, would that be ok to submit?
2016-11-29 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivche...@intel.com>
* mpxrt/libtool-version: New version.
* mpxrt/mpxrt-utils.c (set_mpx_rt_stop_handler): New function.
(prin
not sure what tests should I add. What do you think would be the right
testing process here?
2016-11-29 20:22 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2016-11-29 17:43 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attached p
Hi,
Attached patch is addressing PR67520. Would that approach work for the
problem? Should I also change the version of the library?
2016-11-29 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivche...@intel.com>
* mpxrt/mpxrt-utils.c (set_mpx_rt_stop_handler): New function.
(print_help): Ad
Hi,
The patch below addresses PR68270. could you please take a look?
2016-11-25 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>
* c-family/c.opt (flag_chkp_flexible_struct_trailing_arrays):
Add new option.
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_parse_array_and_component_ref):
Ok, thanks. The full updated patch is below. I also removed the
'--whole-archive' thing from -static-libmpxwrappers case.
Would that be possible to backport that patch to 6 branch as well?
And could you please also address Sergey's comment on adding weak
symbol that he's made in the bugzilla?
2016-08-31 12:18 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich@gmail.com>:
> 2016-08-30 21:53 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> Would something like that count?
>>
>> I did not do the warning thing, cause the problem only appears when
>>
yes
+fi
+ elif test x$gcc_cv_ld != x; then
+# Check if linker supports --push-state/--pop-state options
+if $gcc_cv_ld --help 2>/dev/null | grep -- '--push-state' > /dev/null; then
+ ld_pushpopstate_support=yes
+fi
+ fi
+fi
+if test x"$ld_pushpopstate_support
The attached patched fixes the usage of MPX in presence of
"-Wl,-as-needed" option. 'make checked' on MPX-enabled machine.
"--push-state" and "--pop-state" are not supported by gold at the
moment. But that's OK because using MPX with gold only recommended in
static build.
Would that be OK for
/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index f22bba8..d4d09d0 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-12-08 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * config/linux.c (linux_has_ifunc_p): Remove.
+ * config/linux.h (TARGET_HAS_IFUNC_P): Use default version.
+
2014
*ping*
thanks,
Alexander
2014-11-14 19:49 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/14 21:46, H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I believe the patch is correct. Not all glibcs support IFUNC. It doesn't
mean
we should disable
should we also change this comment in gcc/configure?
--enable-gnu-indirect-function
enable the use of the @gnu_indirect_function to
glibc systems
So, if the patch that I sent for removing linux_has_ifunc_p is
approved, we will just add
-bool
-linux_has_ifunc_p (void)
-{
- return OPTION_BIONIC ? false : HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION;
-}
That is what prevent us from doing so. We need to remove OPTION_BIONIC
from that hook and that is what the patch does.
2014-11-14 8:32 GMT+04:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014
-android is correct.
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index eac19cf..9932323 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-11-11 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * config/linux.c (linux_has_ifunc_p): Remove.
+ * config/linux.h
__stack_chk_fail
(that is scanned in them) is not emitted in position independent case.
Patch is regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Is it OK?
2014-11-12 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
* c-c++-common/tm/safe-3.c: Add bind_pic_locally.
* g++.dg/ipa/devirt-15.C
think they would bring any value.
I tested 'make check' on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and i686-pc-linux-android.
2014-08-15 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
* lib/target-supports.exp (error_h): New check.
(libc_has_complex_functions): Ditto.
(tgmath_h): Ditto
2014-08-15 21:32 GMT+04:00 enh e...@google.com:
can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this? use
b.android.com (and feel free to mail me to ensure that they get
noticed).
Sure, I will do that.
one thing we'd like to do is get to a point where we're building
gcc/gdb et cetera
/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 536485a..893f2b3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+2014-08-13 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * gcc.dg/builtins-59.c: Disable test for Bionic.
+ * gcc.dg/builtins-61.c: Likewise.
+ * gcc.dg/builtins
Thanks for looking at this.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
2014-08-06 0:18 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 08/04/14 00:08, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Hi,
libcilkrts is compiled with -nostdlib, that means we have to
explicitly specify the pthread library we
..b69897b 100644
--- a/fixincludes/ChangeLog
+++ b/fixincludes/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2014-08-04 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * inclhack.def (complier_h_tradcpp): Remove.
+ * fixincl.x: Regenerate.
+ * tests/base/linux/compiler.h: Remove.
+
2014-04-22
Hi Andrew, Joseph,
thanks for looking at the patch. See my comments and updated patch below.
2014-08-05 0:54 GMT+04:00 Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The following patch disables stdio_va_list fix: stdio.h
addresses this as well.
diff --git a/libcilkrts/ChangeLog b/libcilkrts/ChangeLog
index 3881c82..ab10a0b 100644
--- a/libcilkrts/ChangeLog
+++ b/libcilkrts/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2014-08-01 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * configure.ac: Move pthread affinity test to the place
/ChangeLog
+++ b/fixincludes/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2014-08-04 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * inclhack.def (stdio_va_list): Disable fix for *android*.
+ (complier_h_tradcpp): Remove.
+ * fixincl.x: Regenerate.
+ * tests/base/linux/compiler.h: Remove.
+
2014-04-22 Rainer Orth
Hi Jakub,
Looking back into the patch, I don't see any reason to delete
vxwoks-dummy.h, looks like it was my mistake - sorry about that.
So looks like your patch fixes the issue correctly.
Thanks,
Alexander
2014-06-12 21:47 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
Hi!
Seems
ping..
2014-04-04 15:28 GMT+04:00 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
2014-04-04 14:19 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
*ping*
I wonder whether this is consistend between compilers (note
, Balaji V
Cc: Alexander Ivchenko; Richard Biener; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: Fix PR60644
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:23:59PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 8:06 AM
To: Alexander
*ping*
--Alexander
2014-03-27 13:43 GMT+04:00 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Adding Balaji.
--Alexander
2014-03-26 18:56 GMT+04:00 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
In gcc/config/linux-android.h we have builtin_define (__ANDROID__);
So ANDROID as in libcilkrts now
2014-04-04 14:19 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
*ping*
I wonder whether this is consistend between compilers (note GCC is not
upstream here?). So eventually all places should be ANDROID
Adding Balaji.
--Alexander
2014-03-26 18:56 GMT+04:00 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
In gcc/config/linux-android.h we have builtin_define (__ANDROID__);
So ANDROID as in libcilkrts now is not the correct macro to check.
Bootstrapped and passed cilk testsuite on x86_64-unknown
--- a/libcilkrts/ChangeLog
+++ b/libcilkrts/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2014-03-26 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ PR bootstrap/60644
+
+ * include/cilk/metaprogramming.h: Change ANDROID to __ANDROID__.
+ * include/cilk/reducer_min_max.h: Ditto.
+ * runtime/bug.h: Ditto
Here is the patch series that had been posted in Sep that is aimed to
isolate the Android support from targets that actually don't have that
support (We discussed the need of it with Jakub here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00185.html):
Hi,
The patch addresses the issue Jan-Benedict's buildrobot found:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00507.html
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 7704433..da9a3e2 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-11-26 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche
*kind ping*
thanks,
Alexander
2013/11/8 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
ups, I did ping in the wrong thread about this issue. Sorry.
Anyway, I noticed that after r204334 my patch cannot be applied
without conflicts.
Here is the updated one attached. Bootstrapped and regtested
ups, I did ping in the wrong thread about this issue. Sorry.
Anyway, I noticed that after r204334 my patch cannot be applied
without conflicts.
Here is the updated one attached. Bootstrapped and regtested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
2013-11-08 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
Hi,
__cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length and __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length
are generated with -fno-exceptions right now. The attached patch fixes
that problem. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu:
2013-10-07 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
* gcc/cp
/ChangeLog b/libvtv/ChangeLog
index 3c344f9..f0a7471 100644
--- a/libvtv/ChangeLog
+++ b/libvtv/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-09-12 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * configure.tgt: Remove *-*-*android* from supported targets.
+
2013-09-09 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
Hi,
I've added references to fxsr, xsave and xsaveopt options and builtins
to doc/[invoke,extend].texi.
Is it OK?
doc_fxsr_xsave_fxsave.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Maxim,
2013/9/4 Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@kugelworks.com:
On 23/08/2013, at 1:04 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Ugh.. thanks, you are right. That points to another problem that I
didn't see before:
3) *linux* targets that do not append to tm_p_file (s390x-*-linux* and
s390x-ibm-tpf* - your
, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Several builds are broken after r201838.
What targets actually support bionic? If it is just arm, i?86/x86_64
and perhaps aarch64 and nothing else, I'd like to question the way where
you enforce all the
# Add Android userspace support to Linux targets.
case
Hi,
Several builds are broken after r201838.
Here is the fix, awaiting review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01245.html
The targets that are broken now:
1) *linux* targets that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h
(e.g alpha-linux, ppc64-linux etc). For them we have:
Hi,
I've added references to fxsr, xsave and xsaveopt options and builtins
to doc/[invoke,extend].texi.
Is it OK?
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 29a30ee..3aad294 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-08-23 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche
the issues with my initial patch.
(Andreas patch still needs to be applied)
Is it OK?
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 6e27be2..2d15fb1 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+2013-08-21 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * config/linux
didn't miss anything.
Is it ok?
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 6e27be2..02679f3 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2013-08-21 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * config/linux-android.c (linux_android_libc_has_function): Fix
+ checks
Could anybody please take a look? This is important for building gcc
for android.
ping^4
thanks,
Alexander
2013/8/15 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Could anybody please take a look? This is important for building gcc for
android.
ping^4
thanks,
Alexander
2013/5/28 Pavel Chupin
the
external linkage. I added Elliott.
Still, in C standart it is said that rand is defined in stdlib.h, and
we don't include it in that testcase.
thanks,
Alexander
2013/8/5 Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@kugelworks.com:
On 5/08/2013, at 10:57 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Hi,
The following test case
Thanks Andreas, it seems clear now that Bionic rand function is not
consistent with the standart.
--Alexander
2013/8/6 Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de:
Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com writes:
Still, in C standart it is said that rand is defined in stdlib.h, and
we don't include
index f356d55..5c23650 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-08-05 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * gcc.dg/torture/pr56407.c: Add include of stdlib.h. Remove
+ declaration of abort() and rand().
+
2013-08-04 Ed
Just to confirm that the patch successfully regtested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
thanks,
Alexander
2013/7/29 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
2013/7/28 Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com:
On 07/27/13 15:18, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Hi Joseph, thanks for your comments.
I updated
2013/7/28 Michael Eager ea...@eagerm.com:
On 07/27/13 15:18, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Hi Joseph, thanks for your comments.
I updated the patch:
2013/7/9 Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com:
* It looks rather like microblaze*-*-* don't use elfos.h, so meaning
semantics aren't
.
Is it OK?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/7/14 Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@kugelworks.com:
On 13/07/2013, at 10:34 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
for Android:
+2013-06-19 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * g++.dg/tls
*Ping*
Richard, you approved adding target nonpic last time, could you
please take quick a look?
I regularly encounter failing due to AVAIL_OVERWRITABLE tests on
Android.. When people write tests they don't consider pic targets.
thanks,
Alexander
2013/7/8 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
*ping*
Thank you,
Alexander
2013/6/20 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
for Android:
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local4.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local4.C:31:26: error:
'pthread_testcancel' was not declared in this scope
- it was not alphabetically correct).
is the attached patch ok? All fixinclude tests pass.
best regards,
Alexander
2013/7/6 Bruce Korb bruce.k...@gmail.com:
Alexander Ivchenko Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:24:55 -0700
2013/4/29 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net:
On Jan 9, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch
be a pretty obvious fix.
thanks,
Alexander
2013/6/11 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Yep, that also works for us. I updated the patch. Is it ok for trunk?
--Alexander
2013/6/5 Patrick Marlier patrick.marl...@gmail.com:
Hi Alexander,
At least for TM testcase, I would prefer to add
2013/7/8 Bruce Korb bruce.k...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
That was my original letter:
Hi,
Could you please take a look at the attached fixinclude patch
that addresses the problem:
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp
those tests off for Android.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index b8073d1..d217e4d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-06-19 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * g++.dg/tls/thread_local4.C
Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
*ping*
thanks
Alexander
2013/3/28 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
4.8 is now branched, lets come back to the discussion that we had
before. I updated the patch a little
bit since we now have linux-protos.h and linux-android.c files.
I tried to preserve
you think?
Thanks,
--
Patrick
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Another bunch of tests that fails with -fpic.
from here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00539.html
Since -fpic option is turned on by default in Android we have
Hi,
Another bunch of tests that fails with -fpic.
from here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00539.html
Since -fpic option is turned on by default in Android we have certain test
fails. The reason for that is that those tests rely on the
availability of functions, defined in them
*ping*
Alexander
2013/4/18 Patrick Marlier patrick.marl...@gmail.com:
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying it on linux/x86_64 on trunk. Testing just by adding -fpic
to the dg-options:
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm
Oh, sorry. Missed the last msg from Mike in that thread.
2013/5/27 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
*ping*
Alexander
2013/4/18 Patrick Marlier patrick.marl...@gmail.com:
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying
to that idea: in the target hook
libc_has_function we can check whether
the compiler should generate calls to a particular function or not.
The command line support for
each function could be the next step.
Could you please take a look?
thanks
Alexander
2013/4/23 Alexander Ivchenko aivch
*ping*
2013/4/11 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The same motivation as for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-03/msg00786.html
Since -fpic option is turned on by default in Android we have certain test
fails. The reason for that is that those tests rely on the
availability
Richard, the target hook (libc_has_function) for what you described is
waiting for a review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg01201.html
However, it doesn't have command line options support.
Alexander
2013/5/24 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at
Hi,
The following patch fixes PR57385
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57385)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 51e7b9e..cca61e7 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2013-05-24 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ PR
2013/4/29 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net:
On Jan 9, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c on Android. The
reason for that is that
-ftraditional-cpp is not expected to work on Android due to variadic
macro (like
*ping*
thanks,
Alexander
2013/3/26 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Could you please take a look at the attached fixinclude patch
that addresses the problem:
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c on Android. The
reason for that is that
-ftraditional-cpp
*ping*
thank you,
Alexander
2013/4/15 Pavel Chupin pavel.v.chu...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Pavel Chupin pavel.v.chu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Pavel Chupin pavel.v.chu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Android pthread is integrated into libc.
Attached patch
*ping*
thanks
Alexander
2013/3/28 Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com:
Hi,
4.8 is now branched, lets come back to the discussion that we had
before. I updated the patch a little
bit since we now have linux-protos.h and linux-android.c files.
I tried to preserve the avaiability of c99
();
}
}
The fix is pretty obvious, but still.. is it OK for trunk?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/4/11 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Usually stdlib.h does not include string.h but on bionic it is
historically
cgraph_function_body_availability (node)
$54 = AVAIL_OVERWRITABLE
Sure I can file a PR If you think that the test was not supposed to
fail with -fpic
thanks,
Alexander
2013/4/18 Patrick Marlier patrick.marl...@gmail.com:
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote
/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-04-11 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * g++.dg/tm/pr47746.C: Add target nonpic.
+
2013-04-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/54216
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47746.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47746
Hi,
Usually stdlib.h does not include string.h but on bionic it is
historically included. memcmp() reacts on a volatile argument
differently, depending on whether string.h is included or not. If it
is included, then the compiler will generate a warning:
warning: passing argument 2 of 'memcmp'
/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index d18c6e9..0e1d5e4 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-04-02 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
+
+ * config.gcc (arm*-*-linux-*): Remove duplicate t-linux-android.
+
2013-04-02 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
Hi,
Thank you for your review. Since the patch was aimed to fix tests
and it is pretty small, is it posible to backport it to 4.8 branch? So we
would not have those testfails on Android with new release.
Alexander
2013/3/27 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com:
Ok with that change.
Checked
...))
in standard headers and traditional preprocessor cannot handle them.
is it ok for trunk?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/1/9 Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c
of IFUNC
and the build of compiler could be broken. Now we define
HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION as 0 in
those cases.
ok for trunk?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/1/15 Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyr...@gmail.com:
On 15/01/2013, at 4:55 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
thank you very much for your review!
I
Hi,
Finally got my hands on that: the attached patch adds the
target nonpic for those tests that require the avaiability of
functions defined in them.
OK for trunk?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/1/10 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Alexander Ivchenko
thank you very much for your review!
I fixed the arm build and all other issues that you raised.
the patch is attached. Bootstrap and tested on x86-64 linux
Alexander
2013/1/11 Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyr...@gmail.com:
On 10/01/2013, at 12:24 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Config/linux
conservatively assumes that they are AVAIL_OVERWRITABLE.
The attached patch adding -fno-pic option for tests that fail because of that.
2013-01-10 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
* g++.dg/ipa/ivinline-1.C: Add -fno-pic option.
* g++.dg/ipa/ivinline-2.C: Likewise
be the correct sentence would be The default value of this hook
is based on host's libc.?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/1/3 Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyr...@gmail.com:
On 29/12/2012, at 1:30 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Joseph, Maxim, thank you for your input. I converted this macro into
a target hook as you
Hi,
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c on Android. The
reason for that is that
-ftraditional-cpp is not expected to work on Android due to variadic
macro (like #define __builtin_warning(x, y...))
in standard headers and traditional preprocessor cannot handle them.
The attached
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
