On 11/20/2015 02:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:26:45AM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> (gfc_oacc_routine_name): New struct;
>
> Full stop instead of semicolon.
Fixed.
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-nested.c b/gcc/tree-nested.c
>> in
and nohost clauses on trunk yet. Thomas posted
a patch right before stage1 closed. So if that patch gets accepted, I'll
create a follow up patch for routines in fortran.
This this OK for trunk?
Cesar
2015-11-19 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* tree-ne
to gomp4.
As time permits, I'll add more test cases with invalid clause
combination for all of the constructs.
Cesar
2015-11-19 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c (OACC_ROUTINE_CLAUSES): Remove OMP_CLAUSE_OACC_DEVICE
from the clause mask.
gcc/tes
though.
Is this patch ok for trunk?
Cesar
2015-11-17 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/cp/
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold_r): Add support for OACC_LOOP.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
index 8fe9e13..99d0cfb 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc
On 11/10/2015 12:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:28:47PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> Here's the patch that Nathan was referring to. I ended up introducing a
>> boolean variable named first in the various functions which call
>> finalize_oacc_
On 11/08/2015 08:53 PM, James Norris wrote:
> The attached patch and ChangeLog reflect the updates from your
> review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00714.html
> and Cesar's review:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00885.html.
>
> With the changes made in this
On 11/08/2015 07:45 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07/11/15 12:45, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
>> <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports m
On 11/17/2015 09:23 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/17/15 12:23, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 11/17/15 12:16, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> This patch adds an empty priority_queues.c in libgomp for nvptx targets.
>>> Nvptx targets don't have sufficient support for a c
: fatal error: sem.h: No such file or directory
#include "sem.h"
I'm still running the entire testsuite, but it doesn't introduce any new
regressions in libgomp.oacc-c. Is this OK for trunk, or am I missing
something?
Cesar
2015-11-17 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
li
On 11/11/2015 05:40 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/10/15 18:08, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate
>>> patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I disc
On 11/10/2015 12:35 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've committed this to gomp4. In preparing the reworked firstprivate
> patch changes for gomp4's gimplify.c I discovered these testcases were
> passing by accident, and lacked a data clause.
It used to be if a reduction was on a parallel
On 11/10/2015 12:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:28:47PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> Here's the patch that Nathan was referring to. I ended up introducing a
>> boolean variable named first in the various functions which call
>> finalize_oacc_
set to true
if the current declarator is the first in a sequence of declarators, I
was able to defer setting parser->oacc_routine to NULL.
Nathan already approved this patch, so I've applied it to trunk.
Cesar
2015-11-09 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/cp/
* parser.c (
On 11/09/2015 04:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> And these are the new tests. Cesar, c-c++-common/goacc/routine-5.c will
> need adjusting with your C++ parser patch. You'll see the two cases
> I've #if'd out.
I enabled those tests in trunk with the patch I posted here
On 11/08/2015 07:29 AM, James Norris wrote:
> The attached patch and ChangeLog reflect the updates from your
> review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00714.html.
> All of the issues pointed out, have been address.
>
> With the changes made in this patch I think I'm handling the
>
On 11/07/2015 04:30 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
> wrote:
>> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my
>> front end changes from trunk.
>
>>
On 11/07/2015 03:45 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
> wrote:
>> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my
>> front end changes from trunk. Note t
s present on multiple clauses at %L",
+n->sym->name, );
+ else
+ n->sym->mark = 1;
+ }
is unnecessary. I'm not sure if that you intended to check for other
lists or what.
I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-bra
to the kernels and loop
constructs for combined 'acc kernels loop'. The problem here is that
kernels don't support the reduction clause. I'll fix that next week.
Cesar
2015-11-06 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/c-family/
* c-omp.c (c_oacc_split_loop_clauses): Make TILE
On 11/05/2015 09:13 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/05/15 12:01, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:47:58 -0800, Cesar Philippidis
>> <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2015 04:14 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, I
on adding a couple of more test cases once
acc reductions are working on trunk.
Cesar
2015-11-05 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
James Norris <jnor...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* gimplify.c (gimplify_scan_omp_cla
On 11/05/2015 04:14 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:16:59 -0800, Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
> wrote:
>> This patch does the following to the c and c++ front ends:
>
>> * updates c_oacc_split_loop_clauses to filter out the loop
On 11/04/2015 11:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:58:32PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
>> index e3f55a7..4424596 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
>> @@ -14395,6 +14395,15 @@ tsubs
On 11/04/2015 10:09 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> A single function is better, to avoid unnecessary code duplication.
Thanks. I've applied this patch to trunk.
Cesar
2015-11-04 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/cp/
* (cp_parser_oacc_single_int_clause): New
it as-is since it works.
The c++ FE would have had problems with template support eventually
because it was doing type checking during scanning.
Cesar
2015-11-04 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/c/
* c-parser.c (c_parser_oacc_update): Update the error message for
missing c
c clauses. Is it
ok for trunk?
Cesar
2015-11-04 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/cp/
* pt.c (tsubst_omp_clauses): Add support for OMP_CLAUSE_{NUM_GANGS,
NUM_WORKERS,VECTOR_LENGTH,GANG,WORKER,VECTOR,ASYNC,WAIT,TILE,AUTO,
INDEPENDENT,SEQ}.
(tsubst_expr): Add support for OMP_
On 11/04/2015 03:39 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:36:10 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> * Proposed fortran cleanups and enhanced error reporting changes:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg02288.ht
On 11/04/2015 09:15 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c
>> +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c
>
>> @@ -3449,16 +3478,28 @@ gfc_trans_oacc_combined_directive (gfc_code *code)
>>sizeof (construct_clauses));
>>loop_clauses.collapse =
On 11/04/2015 02:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:16:59PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> +
>> + do
>> +{
>> + if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_MULT))
>> +{
>> + c_parser_consume_token (parser);
-list )
where size-expr is one of:
*
int-expr
That '*' symbol complicated the parsing a little, since it's no longer a
primary expression.
I've bootstrapped and regression tested this on x86_64. Is this ok for
trunk?
Cesar
2015-11-03 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.
have either been updated or added.
Is this OK for trunk?
Cesar
2015-11-03 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c (gfc_match_omp_clauses): Update support for the tile
and default clause
his patch to trunk, since it should have been included
with the original patch in the first place.
Cesar
2015-10-31 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
PR Bootstrap/68168
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses): Pass >where when calling
gfc_error.
diff --git a/gcc
On 10/30/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:42:39AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> Another thing is what Jason as C++ maintainer wants, it is nice to get rid
>>> of some code redundancies, on the other side the fact that there is one
On 10/30/2015 01:20 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 10/30/2015 02:09 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> On 10/30/2015 01:56 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> On 10/23/2015 12:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>> On 10/23/2015 10:53 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>>>
>>&
On 10/30/2015 06:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:02:11PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> I noticed that num_gangs, num_workers and vector_length are parsed in
>> somewhat insistent ways in the c++ FE. Both vector_length and num_gangs
>> bail
On 10/30/2015 07:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:21:35AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
>> index b2894cc..93adb7b 100644
>> --- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
>> +++ b/gcc/fortran/gfort
On 10/30/2015 09:58 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> What I meant not just the above changes, but also all changes that
> replace where with >where and the like, so pretty much everything
> except for the oacc_compatible_clauses removal and addition of
> resolve_omp_duplicate_list. That is kind of
piler for openacc. It looks like cgraph.c needs to include
context.h and varpool.c needs context.h and omp-low.h. There's a couple
of ifdef ENABLE_OFFLOADING which may have gone undetected with your script.
I've bootstrapped the attached patch for an nvptx/x86_64-linux target.
I'm still testing t
In gomp-4_0-branch, we've tried to consolidate the parsing all of the
clauses of the form
foo (int-expression)
into a single c*_parser_omp_positive_int_clause function. At the time,
such clauses included num_gangs, num_workers, vector_length and
num_threads. Looking at OpenMP 4.5, there are
On 10/29/2015 07:08 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> In gomp-4_0-branch, we've tried to consolidate the parsing all of the
> clauses of the form
>
> foo (int-expression)
>
> into a single c*_parser_omp_positive_int_clause function. At the time,
> such clauses included n
and bootstrapped on
x86_64-linux.
Cesar
2015-10-29 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/cp/
* parser.c (cp_parser_oacc_positive_int_clause): New function.
(cp_parser_oacc_clause_vector_length): Delete.
(cp_parser_omp_clause_num_gangs): Delete.
(cp_parser_omp_clause_num_workers):
On 10/28/2015 04:00 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Cesar!
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:36:10 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> This patch contains the following:
>>
>> * C front end changes from trunk:
>> https://gcc.gn
On 10/27/2015 01:18 PM, James Norris wrote:
> This patch adds the processing of OpenACC declare directive in C
> and C++. (Note: Support in Fortran is already in trunk.)
> Commentary on the changes is included as an attachment (NOTES).
A quick diff of gomp4 and trunk reveals quite a
, num_workers and vector_length in gomp4. But
support for those clauses are already present in trunk. I'll post more
details with the patch later.
Cesar
2015-10-28 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
* gcc/c/c-parser.c (c_parser_oacc_simple_clause): New
function.
(c_parser_oacc_all_c
On 10/26/2015 11:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:51:42AM -0500, James Norris wrote:
>> @@ -12942,6 +12961,7 @@ c_finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, bool is_omp,
>> bool declare_simd)
>> case OMP_CLAUSE_GANG:
>> case OMP_CLAUSE_WORKER:
>> case
(was "Re: more accurate omp in fortran"
Ping.
Cesar
On 10/22/2015 08:21 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> Currently, for certain omp and oacc errors the fortran will inaccurately
> report exactly where in the omp/acc construct the error has occurred. E.g.
>
>!$acc par
.
Cesar
2015-10-27 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/c/
* c-parser.c (c_parser_oacc_shape_clause): Backport from trunk.
(c_parser_omp_simple_clause): Likewise.
(c_parser_oacc_all_clauses): Likewise.
gcc/cp/
* parser.c (cp_parser_oacc_shape_clause): Backport from
On 10/26/2015 03:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:11:41PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
>> @@ -5911,6 +5911,31 @@ finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, bool allow_fields,
On 10/26/2015 01:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Ok for trunk with those changes fixed.
Here's the patch with those changes. Nathan will commit this patch the
rest of the openacc execution model patches.
Thanks,
Cesar
2015-10-26 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
Thomas
On 10/23/2015 07:37 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 01:25 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 01:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:18:55PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>>> This patch is the C++ changes
On 10/24/2015 01:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:31:51PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>
>> +static tree
>> +c_parser_oacc_shape_clause (c_parser *parser, omp_clause_code kind,
>> +const char *str, tree list)
>>
On 10/23/2015 01:25 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 01:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:18:55PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> This patch is the C++ changes matching the C ones of patch 4. In
>>> finish_omp_clauses, the gan
On 10/23/2015 01:29 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 08:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>>> But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed:
>>>
>>> int v, w;
>
On 10/23/2015 02:31 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 01:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:17:07PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> Good idea, thanks. This patch also corrects the problems parsing weird
>>> combinations of num,
On 10/22/2015 01:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:16:20PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> 2015-10-20 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
>> Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
>> James Norris <jnor...@
On 10/22/2015 08:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed:
>>
>> int v, w;
>> ...
>> gang(26) // equivalent to gang(num:26)
>> gan
_LOCATION (c), 0,
>> - "%<num_threads%> value must be positive");
>> - t = integer_one_node;
>> - }
>> - t = fold_build_cleanup_point_expr (TREE_TYPE (t), t);
>> -}
On 10/23/2015 01:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:17:07PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> Good idea, thanks. This patch also corrects the problems parsing weird
>> combinations of num, static and length arguments that you mentioned
>> elsewh
On 10/22/2015 07:23 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 10/22/15 10:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:53:46AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> On 10/22/15 05:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>
And, I must say I'm at least missing testcases that check parsing
but also
also split off the check for variables appearing in multiple
clauses into a separate function. It's a little overkill for trunk right
now, but it is used quite a bit in gomp4 for oacc declare.
I've tested these changes on x86_64. Is this ok for trunk?
Cesar
2015-10-22 Cesar Philippidis <
On 10/22/2015 08:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed:
>>
>> int v, w;
>> ...
>> gang(26) // equivalent to gang(num:26)
>> gan
On 10/20/2015 02:13 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 11:04 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/20/2015 08:34 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
This allows to emit decls in 'shared' memory from the middle-end.
*
only certain arrays have array descriptors? The
arrays with descriptors don't have this problem. It's only the ones
without descriptors that leak new internal variables that cause errors
with default(none).
Cesar
2015-10-13 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/fortran/
*
On 10/13/2015 01:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 01:12:25PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> Arrays in fortran have a couple of internal variables associated with
>> them, e.g. stride, lbound, ubound, size, etc. Depending on how and where
>> t
the enum in gfortran.h because I couldn't figure out how things
were ordered before.
I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-10-01 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/fortran/
* dump-parse-tree.c (show_omp_clauses): Add missing omp list_types
and reorder the switch
in omplow.
I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-09-30 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c (resolve_oacc_loop_blocks): Represent astrisk tile
arguments as -1.
gcc/testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/goacc/loop-5.f95: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/f
Ping.
In the meantime, I'll apply this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
On 09/22/2015 08:24 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> In both OpenACC and OpenMP, each subarray has at least two data mappings
> associated with them, one for the pointer and another for the data in
> the array sectio
On 09/29/2015 02:48 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:08:34 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which teaches omplower how to
>> error when it detects acc loops which aren't nested i
of long. Let me know if it should be revised.
Cesar
2015-09-28 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* omp-low.c (check_omp_nesting_restrictions): Check for acc loops not
associated with acc regions or routines.
gcc/testsuite/
* c-c++-common/goacc/non-routine.c: New test.
On 09/25/2015 03:57 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 09/24/15 16:32, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> On 09/22/2015 08:29 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>
>>> 1) Don't have a fake gang reduction outside of worker & vector loops.
>>> Deal with the receiver obj
On 09/22/2015 08:29 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> 1) Don't have a fake gang reduction outside of worker & vector loops.
> Deal with the receiver object directly. I.e. 'ref_to_res' need not be a
> null pointer for vector and worker loops.
What happens when there is no receiver object. E.g. a
Gang, worker, vector and collapse all contain optional arguments which
may be used during loop expansion. In OpenACC, those expressions could
contain variables, but those variables aren't always getting remapped
automatically. This patch remaps those variables inside lower_omp_loop.
Note that I
On 09/23/2015 10:42 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
This patch, that is.
Cesar
2015-09-23 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* omp-low.c (lower_omp_for): Remap any variables present in
OMP_CLAUSE_GANG, OMP_CLAU
On 09/23/2015 11:26 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:57:40 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On 09/23/2015 10:42 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> | Gang, worker, vector and collapse all contain optional arguments which
>
. This patch teaches the gimplifier to do that. This
corrects a bug where a dummy array gets implicitly transferred as
firstprivate instead of pcopy.
I've applied patch has been committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-09-22 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* gimp
as-is because I'm not that
familiar with how non-OpenMP target regions get lowered.
Is this patch OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Cesar
2015-09-22 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* fortran/trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_finish_clause): Don't cast ptr
into a character p
todo_flags_start */
> + TODO_update_ssa | TODO_cleanup_cfg, /* todo_flags_finish */
> +};
Cesar
2015-09-21 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi: Document -fdump-tree-oacc_xforms.
* omp-low.c (pass_data_oacc_transform): Rename the tree dump for
oacc_transform as oacc
On 09/18/2015 01:39 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 18:29:55 +0200, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com>
> wrote:
>> On 27/08/15 03:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>>> - ctx->ganglocal_size_host = align_and_expand (_host, host_size, align);
>>
-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-09-11 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* omp-low.c (build_outer_var_ref):
gcc/testsuite/
* c-c++-common/goacc/parallel-reduction.c: Enclose the parallel
reduction inside an acc data region.
libgomp/
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/pa
resolved?
Cesar
2015-09-09 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* omp-low.c (struct oacc_gwv): New struct.
(filter_omp_clause): New function.
(set_oacc_parallel_loop_gwv_1): New function.
(set_oacc_parallel_loop_gwv): New function.
(scan_omp_for): Use filer_omp_clause to
, but for the time being, global locks appear to work albeit with a
lock contention penalty.
I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-09-08 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (force_global_lock): New global variable.
(nvptx_expand_oacc_lock
that bug and removes the xfails from the
reduction test cases.
This patch has been committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-09-02 Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com>
libgomp/
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-reduction-gwv-np-2.c:
Remove xfail.
* testsuite/libgomp.oa
This patch teaches lower_oacc_reductions not to generate calls to
GOACC_{UN}LOCK if they aren't any reductions. That situation can happen
when there is a fake gang reduction on a private variable.
I also found a bug where the lower_rec_input_clauses expects there to be
a data mapping for the
[Attaching patch this time.]
On 09/01/2015 04:21 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch teaches lower_oacc_reductions not to generate calls to
> GOACC_{UN}LOCK if they aren't any reductions. That situation can happen
> when there is a fake gang reduction on a private variable.
&g
of these loops. I.e., only the seq
loop itself is executing in a non-partitioned mode. Julian inquired
about this in the openacc technical list a while ago, but I don't think
he got a response.
This patch has been applied to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-08-28 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
On 08/27/2015 06:13 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 08/26/15 21:37, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch strips out all of the references to ganglocal memory in gcc.
Unfortunately, the runtime api still takes a shared memory parameter, so
I haven't made any changes there yet. Perhaps we could
nicely with const_basic_block.
Is this patch ok for gomp-4_0-branch?
Cesar
2015-08-25 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* tracer.c (ignore_bb_p): Change bb argument from const_basic_block
to basic_block. Check for non-clonable calls to internal functions.
diff --git a/gcc
On 08/21/2015 02:00 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch teaches omplower how to utilize the new OpenACC reduction
framework described in Nathan's document, which was posted here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01248.html. Here is the
infrastructure patch
https://gcc.gnu.org
function used in the patch a couple of days ago.
I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-08-26 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* omp-low.c (lower_oacc_reductions): Call GOACC_REDUCTION_INIT
to initialize the gang and worker mutex.
diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.c b/gcc/omp
?
Cesar
2015-08-26 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* builtins.c (expand_oacc_ganglocal_ptr): Delete.
(expand_builtin): Remove stale GOACC_GET_GANGLOCAL_PTR builtin.
* config/nvptx/nvptx.md (ganglocal_ptr): Delete.
* gimple.h (struct gimple_statement_omp_parallel_layout
committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
2015-08-24 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/c-family
* c-omp.c (c_oacc_split_loop_clauses): Don't propagate
OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE to acc loops with splitting the clauses.
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-omp.c b/gcc/c-family/c-omp.c
index e9df829
This patch adds support for num_gangs, num_workers and vector_length
inside nested functions. This fixes an ICE that I hit inside a nested
fortran subroutine that was using a num_gangs clause on an acc parallel
construct.
I applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch.
Cesar
in?
Cesar
2015-08-20 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (enum nvptx_builtins): New enum.
(NVPTX_BUILTIN_MAX): Delete.
(nvptx_get_worker_red_addr_fn): New function.
(nvptx_generate_vector_shuffle): New function.
(nvptx_shuffle_reduction): New function
Nathan noticed that I was using VLA's in the a couple of compile-time
reduction tests. That's bad because ptx doesn't have support alloca. I
guess these tests used to pass because we were only running them on the
host.
I'll apply this patch shortly.
Cesar
2015-08-21 Cesar Philippidis ce
for now
because par-loops doesn't support workers and vectors yet. But if we go
with this change, par-loops will need to be updated eventually.
Is this ok for gomp-4_0-branch?
Cesar
2015-08-21 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* gimplify.c (struct privatize_reduction): New struct
and friends, while OpenACC will use this
infrastructure. That said, OpenMP could taught to use this infrastructure.
Is this patch OK for gomp-4_0-branch?
Thanks,
Cesar
2015-08-19 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
* doc/tm.texi.in: Add a placeholder
later on if
necessary.
I'll apply this patch to gomp-4_0-branch shortly.
Cesar
2015-08-14 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* c/c-typeck.c (c_finish_omp_clauses): Permit variables to appear
in both OpenACC data and reduction clauses.
* cp/semantics.c (finish_omp_clauses
On 07/28/2015 09:52 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I've committed this patch to the gomp4 branch to redo the launch API.
I'll post a version for trunk once the versioning patch gets approved
committed.
This changes the API in a number of ways, allowing device-specific
knowledge to be moved
))
(const_int 0 [0]))) wred.c:9 -1
(nil))
The attached patch fixes it by assigning worker_red_sym to a scratch
register. Is this OK gomp-4_0-branch?
Cesar
2015-08-06 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_expand_work_red_addr): Use
as-is for gomp-4_0-branch?
Thanks,
Cesar
2015-08-06 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_expand_lock_unlock): Pass an
additional scratch register to gen_nvptx_spinlock.
* config/nvptx/nvptx.md (nvptx_membar): Use %B for the address
space operand
401 - 500 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
