> Looks OK, but there is no ChangeLog. Do you have copyright
> assignment?
Have added ChangeLog to the patch, please see the attachment. And I
think I have copyright assignment, because I have Free Software
Foundation paperwork, as "ASSIGNMENT - GNU GCC ... JIE RT688742"
Best Regards,
Jie
gcj-
Hi,
I have add the boehm-gc patch and the configure for gcc patch to the
patch attached. So we can add this patch and then compile gcj for
RTEMS.
Best Regards,
Jie
gcj-rtems.patch
Description: Binary data
> If you did, then I don't know, you'll have to debug it, sorry.
>
> I vaguely recollect that -fcheck-references adds a check for 'this' at
> the start of final methods. If I'm misremembering, then that is
> probably the problem.
In my debug, there appears no check for 'this' at start of String.l
> Jie> But it does not work as we want, is there something wrong?
>
> Did you rebuild all of libgcj?
Yes. :)
>
> If you did, then I don't know, you'll have to debug it, sorry.
>
> I vaguely recollect that -fcheck-references adds a check for 'this' at
> the start of final methods. If I'm misrememb
Hi,
For the previous analysis "libjava patches for RTEMS"[1], there are 6
cases need to pay more attention. PR18699, TLtest, Thread_Interrupt,
Thread_Sleep_2, Throw_2 and bclink.
After add patch to bdwgc for RTEMS pthread support[2]:
PR18699PASS after Modify [A bug in boehm-
2011/8/10 Tom Tromey :
>>>>>> "Jie" == Jie Liu writes:
>
> Jie> RTEMS does not have virtual memory management, so there is no error
> Jie> when access the 0 address on rtems.
> Jie> So 'str->length()' donot throw NPE and just return
?r=127,
npe.c is the main file and *.scn is the output.
Thanks,
Jie
2011/8/8 Tom Tromey :
>>>>>> "Jie" == Jie Liu writes:
>
> Jie> + if(str == NULL)
> Jie> + throw new NullPointerException();
> Jie> +
> Jie> int length = s
Hi,
When I use gcj on an RTOS(RTEMS), Double.parseDouble(null) throw
NumberFormatException, but it should throw NullPointerException. So I
add the patch below:
Index: natVMDouble.cc
===
--- natVMDouble.cc (revision 172224)
+++ n
Hi,
GCJ is available on RTEMS/pc386. Here is the libjava testsuite result
on RTEMS/pc386:
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes2249
# of unexpected failures94
# of untested testcases 66
As the testsuite result is good enough, I think it's time to get t
=
--- os_dep.c(revision 172224)
+++ os_dep.c(working copy)
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@
# if !defined(OS2) && !defined(PCR) && !defined(AMIGA) \
&& !defined(MSWIN32) && !defined(MSWINCE) \
- && !defined(MACOS) && !defined(D
Hi,
I am working on porting gcj to rtems now, it's a project of GSoC2011.[1]
And now, the first step: boehm-gc have been ported, so I want to get
this patch reviewed and merged.
And I have filed the FSF Paperwork, the patch has been attached.
Thank you for your time.
Best Regards,
Jie
[1]http:
11 matches
Mail list logo