Ok.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 10:28 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:55:34PM +, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 1:31 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:55:34PM +, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 1:31 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On the following new testcase we emit 2 different constexpr errors
> > > because of
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 1:31 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On the following new testcase we emit 2 different constexpr errors
> > because of premature folding, where the PR44100 hack which is supposed
> > to fold
Hi!
On the following new testcase we emit 2 different constexpr errors
because of premature folding, where the PR44100 hack which is supposed
to fold expressions like &((S *)0)->f or
&((S *)24)->f folds all the >y expressions if x is TREE_CONSTANT
into (some type)(x + cst) where what we were
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On the following new testcase we emit 2 different constexpr errors
> because of premature folding, where the PR44100 hack which is supposed
> to fold expressions like &((S *)0)->f or
> &((S *)24)->f folds all the >y expressions if x