On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR 51782 showed that COMPONENT_REFs created by SRA got expanded with a
>> wrong address space because the address space was not specified in the
>> type of the whole tree. This is however inconsistent wit
Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR 51782 showed that COMPONENT_REFs created by SRA got expanded with a
> wrong address space because the address space was not specified in the
> type of the whole tree. This is however inconsistent with how we
> encode address spaces in MEM_REFs where they are supp
Hi,
PR 51782 showed that COMPONENT_REFs created by SRA got expanded with a
wrong address space because the address space was not specified in the
type of the whole tree. This is however inconsistent with how we
encode address spaces in MEM_REFs where they are supposed to be stored
in the type of
