On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part
is approved and committed first.
Thanks,
Uros.
Thanks for review!
Attached is a version to be committed. The only difference from the previous
one is BOUND_MODE renamed to
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part
is approved and committed first.
Thanks,
Uros.
Thanks for review!
Attached is a version to be
2013/10/24 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part
is approved and committed first.
Thanks,
Uros.
Thanks for
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part
is approved and committed first.
Thanks,
Uros.
Thanks for review!
Attached is a version to be committed. The only difference from the
On 26 Sep 23:12, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but
please first get target-independent changes reviewed and committed.
Do you mean I should move
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but
please first get target-independent changes reviewed and committed.
Do you mean I should move bound type and mode declaration into a
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but
please first get target-independent changes reviewed and committed.
Do you mean I should move bound type and mode declaration into a
On 16 Sep 11:24, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/9/11 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
Hi Uros,
Thanks a lot for the review!
The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but
please first