Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-10-24 Thread Ilya Enkovich
On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote: This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part is approved and committed first. Thanks, Uros. Thanks for review! Attached is a version to be committed. The only difference from the previous one is BOUND_MODE renamed to

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-10-24 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote: This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part is approved and committed first. Thanks, Uros. Thanks for review! Attached is a version to be

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-10-24 Thread Ilya Enkovich
2013/10/24 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote: This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part is approved and committed first. Thanks, Uros. Thanks for

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-10-24 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part is approved and committed first. Thanks, Uros. Thanks for review! Attached is a version to be committed. The only difference from the

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-10-01 Thread Ilya Enkovich
On 26 Sep 23:12, Uros Bizjak wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but please first get target-independent changes reviewed and committed. Do you mean I should move

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-10-01 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but please first get target-independent changes reviewed and committed. Do you mean I should move bound type and mode declaration into a

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-09-26 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but please first get target-independent changes reviewed and committed. Do you mean I should move bound type and mode declaration into a

Re: [PATCH, i386, MPX 1/X] Support of Intel MPX ISA. 2/2 New registers and instructions

2013-09-17 Thread Ilya Enkovich
On 16 Sep 11:24, Uros Bizjak wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/11 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com: Hi Uros, Thanks a lot for the review! The x86 part looks mostly OK (I have a couple of comments bellow), but please first