On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:07:58PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 29/11/16 20:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >Hi James, Kyrill,
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:33AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >>>+static sbitmap
> >>>+aarch64_components_for_bb (basic_block bb)
> >>>+{
> >>>+ bitma
On 29/11/16 20:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi James, Kyrill,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:33AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
+static sbitmap
+aarch64_components_for_bb (basic_block bb)
+{
+ bitmap in = DF_LIVE_IN (bb);
+ bitmap gen = &DF_LIVE_BB_INFO (bb)->gen;
+ bitmap kill = &DF_LIVE_
Hi James, Kyrill,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:33AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > +static sbitmap
> > +aarch64_components_for_bb (basic_block bb)
> > +{
> > + bitmap in = DF_LIVE_IN (bb);
> > + bitmap gen = &DF_LIVE_BB_INFO (bb)->gen;
> > + bitmap kill = &DF_LIVE_BB_INFO (bb)->kill;
> > +
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:32:41AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>+
> >>+/* Implement TARGET_SHRINK_WRAP_COMPONENTS_FOR_BB. */
> >>+
> >>+static sbitmap
> >>+aarch64_components_for_bb (basic_block bb)
> >>+{
> >>+ bitmap in = DF_LIVE_IN (bb);
> >>+ bitmap gen = &DF_LIVE_BB_INFO (bb)->gen;
>
On 29/11/16 11:18, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi James,
On 29/11/16 10:57, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:25:28PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 10:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Th
Hi James,
On 29/11/16 10:57, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:25:28PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 10:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:25:28PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 11/11/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >
> >On 11/11/16 10:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>
> >>On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1
On 18/11/16 12:50, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:29:13AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
So your COMPONENTS_FOR_BB returns both components in a pair whenever one
of those is needed? That should work afaics.
I mean I still want to have one component per register and since
e
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:29:13AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >So your COMPONENTS_FOR_BB returns both components in a pair whenever one
> >of those is needed? That should work afaics.
>
> I mean I still want to have one component per register and since
> emit_{prologue,epilogue}_components kn
On 17/11/16 17:45, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:50:46PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Is loading/storing a pair as cheap as loading/storing a single register?
In that case you could shrink-wrap per pair of registers instead.
I suppose it can vary by microarchitecture. Fo
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:50:46PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>Is loading/storing a pair as cheap as loading/storing a single register?
> >>In that case you could shrink-wrap per pair of registers instead.
> >
> >I suppose it can vary by microarchitecture. For the purposes of codegen
> >I'd s
On 17/11/16 14:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 17/11/16 14:44, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:22:08PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there
were
some interesting swings.
458.sjeng +1.45%
471.omnetp
On 17/11/16 15:01, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:55:20PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Overall, there's a slight improvement in SPECINT, even with the gobmk
regression and a slightly larger improvement
on SPECFP due to povray.
And that is for only the "normal" GPRs, not L
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:55:20PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>Overall, there's a slight improvement in SPECINT, even with the gobmk
> >>regression and a slightly larger improvement
> >>on SPECFP due to povray.
> >And that is for only the "normal" GPRs, not LR or FP yet, right?
>
> This patch
On 17/11/16 14:44, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:22:08PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there
were
some interesting swings.
458.sjeng +1.45%
471.omnetpp +2.19%
445.gobmk -2.01%
On SPECFP:
Hi Kyrill,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:22:08PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there
> >>were
> >>some interesting swings.
> >>458.sjeng +1.45%
> >>471.omnetpp +2.19%
> >>445.gobmk -2.01%
> >>
>
On 14/11/16 14:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 10:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
I ran SPE
On 11/11/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/11/16 10:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were
On 11/11/16 10:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there were
some interesting swi
On 10/11/16 23:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there were
some interesting swings.
458.sjeng +1.45%
471.omnetpp +2.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
> > I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there were
> > some interesting swings.
> > 458.sjeng +1.45%
> > 471.omnetpp +2.19%
> > 445.gobmk -2.01%
> >
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch implements the new separate shrink-wrapping hooks for aarch64.
> In separate shrink wrapping (as I understand it) we consider each register
> save/restore as
> a 'component' that can be performed independently of the o
On 10/11/16 16:26, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
Hi,
Great to see this. Just a few comments...
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:25:47PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
+/* Implement TARGET_SHRINK_WRAP_GET_SEPARATE_COMPONENTS. */
+
+static sbitmap
+aarch64_get_separate_components (void)
+{
+ /* C
Hi!
Great to see this. Just a few comments...
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:25:47PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> +/* Implement TARGET_SHRINK_WRAP_GET_SEPARATE_COMPONENTS. */
> +
> +static sbitmap
> +aarch64_get_separate_components (void)
> +{
> + /* Calls to alloca further extend the stack fram
Hi all,
This patch implements the new separate shrink-wrapping hooks for aarch64.
In separate shrink wrapping (as I understand it) we consider each register
save/restore as
a 'component' that can be performed independently of the other save/restores in
the prologue/epilogue
and can be moved out
25 matches
Mail list logo
