> Thanks, here is the patch doing this.
> Committing to trunk after bootstrap and testing on x86_64.
Thanks for the quick turn around!
--
Eric Botcazou
On 03/11/16 12:05, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 02/11/16 11:36, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I think you're right. I suppose the new condition should be:
#ifdef LOAD_EXTEND_OP
/* If this is a typical RISC machine, we only have to worry
about the way loads are extended. */
if
On 02/11/16 11:36, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I think you're right. I suppose the new condition should be:
#ifdef LOAD_EXTEND_OP
/* If this is a typical RISC machine, we only have to worry
about the way loads are extended. */
if (!WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS
> I think you're right. I suppose the new condition should be:
>
> #ifdef LOAD_EXTEND_OP
> /* If this is a typical RISC machine, we only have to worry
>about the way loads are extended. */
> if (!WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS
>
> || ((LOAD_EXTEND_OP
Hi Eric,
On 02/11/16 10:47, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This converts the preprocessor check for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS into a
runtime one in rtlanal.c.
Since this one was in combination with an "#if defined" and used to guard an
if-statement I'd appreciate it if someone gave it a double-check that
> This converts the preprocessor check for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS into a
> runtime one in rtlanal.c.
>
> Since this one was in combination with an "#if defined" and used to guard an
> if-statement I'd appreciate it if someone gave it a double-check that I
> dind't screw up the intended
On 12/15/2015 10:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This converts the preprocessor check for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS into a
runtime one
in rtlanal.c.
Since this one was in combination with an "#if defined" and used to
guard an if-statement
I'd appreciate it if someone gave it a double-check
Hi all,
This converts the preprocessor check for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS into a
runtime one
in rtlanal.c.
Since this one was in combination with an "#if defined" and used to guard an
if-statement
I'd appreciate it if someone gave it a double-check that I dind't screw up the
intended
On 12/15/2015 06:25 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on arm, aarch64, x86_64.
I'd say let's wait. Some of the changes look misindented btw.
Bernd
