> -Original Message-
> From: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:00 PM
> To: Hale Wang
> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Joseph Myers; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2] [ARM] [libgcc] Support RTABI half-prec
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Hale Wang wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:50 PM
>> To: Joseph Myers
>> Cc: Hale Wang; GCC Patches
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH
> -Original Message-
> From: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:50 PM
> To: Joseph Myers
> Cc: Hale Wang; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2] [ARM] [libgcc] Support RTABI half-precision
> conversion functi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Hale Wang wrote:
>
>> Yes, you are right. It's my fault to add the "only" here. Thank you to point
>> out this.
>> Beside this, is this patch OK for you?
>
> I don't think it's a good idea for libgcc to include large piec
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Hale Wang wrote:
> Yes, you are right. It's my fault to add the "only" here. Thank you to point
> out this.
> Beside this, is this patch OK for you?
I don't think it's a good idea for libgcc to include large pieces of
assembly code generated by a compiler. Just compile the
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Myers
> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 4:30 AM
> To: Hale Wang
> Cc: 'GCC Patches'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2] [ARM] [libgcc] Support RT
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Hale Wang wrote:
> According to the run-time ABI for ARM architecture, this function is allowed
> to corrupt only the integer core registers permitted to be corrupted by the
> [AAPCS] (r0-r3, ip, lr, and CPSR). So we can't just simply use the existing
> GNU conversion function
