On 3/19/23 10:20 PM, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Nice, OK for trunk and gcc12 branch, thanks!
Pushed to trunk and the GCC 12 release branch. Thanks.
Peter
Hi Peter,
on 2023/3/18 10:30, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/17/23 7:17 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> On 3/17/23 5:35 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> When we expand the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in, we use the wrong mode
>>> for the MEM operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. The solution
On 3/17/23 7:17 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/17/23 5:35 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> When we expand the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in, we use the wrong mode
>> for the MEM operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. The solution
>> is to use the correct TMODE mode.
>>
>> Is this ok for
On 3/17/23 5:35 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> When we expand the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in, we use the wrong mode
> for the MEM operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. The solution
> is to use the correct TMODE mode.
>
> Is this ok for trunk and gcc12 assuming my bootstraps and
When we expand the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in, we use the wrong mode
for the MEM operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. The solution
is to use the correct TMODE mode.
Is this ok for trunk and gcc12 assuming my bootstraps and regtests show
no regressions?
Peter
gcc/
PR
