Re: Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets of bb-slp-subgroups-3.c

2024-01-16 Thread Richard Biener
= _27 * { 3, 4, 5, 7 }; > MEM [(int *) + 16B] = vect__9.9_28; > > > We can confirm it here: https://godbolt.org/z/6jGrEoz9s So same thing, add && { ! vect128 }? > > > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai > > From: Richard Biener > Date: 2024-01-16 15:43 > To: Juzhe-Zhong

Re: Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets of bb-slp-subgroups-3.c

2024-01-16 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Biener Date: 2024-01-16 15:43 To: Juzhe-Zhong CC: gcc-patches; pinskia Subject: Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets of bb-slp-subgroups-3.c On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: > Notice there is a regression recently: > XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgrou

Re: Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets

2024-01-15 Thread Richard Biener
_unpack_lo_expr] vect_patt_158.14_199; > vect_patt_159.15_201 = [vec_unpack_hi_expr] vect_patt_158.14_199; so xfail { vect_variable_length && { ! vect256 } && { ! vect128 } } then? > > > juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai > > From: Richard Biener > Date: 2024-01-16 15:38 > To:

Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets of bb-slp-subgroups-3.c

2024-01-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: > Notice there is a regression recently: > XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects > scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 > XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: > basic

Re: Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets

2024-01-15 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
ichard Biener Date: 2024-01-16 15:38 To: Juzhe-Zhong CC: gcc-patches; Tamar.Christina Subject: Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: > Recently notice there is a XPASS in RISC-V: > XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-43.c -flto

Re: [PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets

2024-01-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Juzhe-Zhong wrote: > Recently notice there is a XPASS in RISC-V: > XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-43.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-not > slp2 "vector operands from scalars" > XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-43.c scan-tree-dump-not slp2 "vector operands from > scalars" > >

[PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets of bb-slp-subgroups-3.c

2024-01-15 Thread Juzhe-Zhong
Notice there is a regression recently: XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-3.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "optimized: basic block" 2 Checked on both ARM SVE an RVV:

[PATCH] test regression fix: Remove xfail for variable length targets

2024-01-15 Thread Juzhe-Zhong
Recently notice there is a XPASS in RISC-V: XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-43.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-not slp2 "vector operands from scalars" XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-43.c scan-tree-dump-not slp2 "vector operands from scalars" And checked both ARM SVE and RVV: