On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:18 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> We know that the statement we are moving is already
> have a SSA_NAME on the lhs so we don't need to
> check that and can also just call reset_flow_sensitive_info
> with the name we already got.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and
We know that the statement we are moving is already
have a SSA_NAME on the lhs so we don't need to
check that and can also just call reset_flow_sensitive_info
with the name we already got.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
*
