On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:37:28PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Jason said (for the C++ part of the patch):
> > About passing parser in or not, I'm happy with the current approach;
> > adding things to the stack isn't free in a highly recursive program
> > like GCC.
> (in
On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 12:09 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/04/2017 08:32 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 11:34 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On 08/01/2017 02:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > Changed in v2:
> > > >
> > > > * Renamed template argument to traits_t; eliminated
On 08/04/2017 08:32 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 11:34 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 08/01/2017 02:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> Changed in v2:
>>>
>>> * Renamed template argument to traits_t; eliminated subclasses,
>>> just
>>> using traits struct.
>>> * Moved enum
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 11:34 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/01/2017 02:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Changed in v2:
> >
> > * Renamed template argument to traits_t; eliminated subclasses,
> > just
> > using traits struct.
> > * Moved enum constants into struct bodies (string constants can't
>
On 08/01/2017 02:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Changed in v2:
>
> * Renamed template argument to traits_t; eliminated subclasses, just
> using traits struct.
> * Moved enum constants into struct bodies (string constants can't be
> without constexpr, which isn't available in C++98).
> * Fixed
Changed in v2:
* Renamed template argument to traits_t; eliminated subclasses, just
using traits struct.
* Moved enum constants into struct bodies (string constants can't be
without constexpr, which isn't available in C++98).
* Fixed typo.
OK for trunk?
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
* c-parser.c
