On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> The only points in that patch are that on one hand - as far as I
> know - the Abi does not guarantee that section symbols are either
> zero or not relocated, even if that may be the case in reality.
> And on the other hand, if that code is ev
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:29:33AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On s390[x] the symbol value of a section symbol is definitely not
> > zero.
>
> Is true even in an object file?
No.
> I agree that in an executable a
> section symbol wil
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On s390[x] the symbol value of a section symbol is definitely not
> zero.
Is true even in an object file? I agree that in an executable a
section symbol will have a non-zero value, but that case doesn't arise
since an executable won't have
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:25:55PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > * libgo/go/debug/elf/file.go (applyRelocationsAMD64):
> > Fix the calculation of some relocations; do not assume that the
> > symbol
> > value is alw
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> This optional cleanup patch fixes some sloppy programming in the
> x86 libgo/go/debug/elf library that had given me a very hard time
> to debug and fix when porting the code to s390[x]. See commit
> comment for details.
>
> ChangeLog
> 2014-09
This optional cleanup patch fixes some sloppy programming in the
x86 libgo/go/debug/elf library that had given me a very hard time
to debug and fix when porting the code to s390[x]. See commit
comment for details.
ChangeLog
2014-09-05 Dominik Vogt
* libgo/go/debug/elf/file.go (applyRe
