On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:02 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim
> On Jan 17, 2024, at 19:05, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
>> On Jan 17, 2024, at 19:02, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov
>> wrote:
>>>
On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2024, at 19:02, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov
wrote:
>
> > On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> >>> Hi Vladimir,
> >>> Hi Jeff,
> >>>
> >>> Richard and
> On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no
>>> further comments. OK to
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no
> > further comments. OK to merge?
> I think the question is whether or not we're too late.
On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Hi Jeff,
Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no
further comments. OK to merge?
I think the question is whether or not we're too late. I know that
Richard S has held off on his late-combine pass and I'm
On 1/15/24 07:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Hi Jeff,
Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no
further comments. OK to merge?
I trust Richard and Alexander therefore I did not do additional review
of the patches and have no any comment. Richard's or
Hi Vladimir,
Hi Jeff,
Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no
further comments. OK to merge?
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 15:14, Maxim Kuvyrkov
wrote:
> This patch avoids sched-deps.cc:find_inc() creating exponential number
> of dependencies, which become memory and
This patch avoids sched-deps.cc:find_inc() creating exponential number
of dependencies, which become memory and compilation time hogs.
Consider example (simplified from PR96388) ...
===
sp=sp-4 // sp_insnA
mem_insnA1[sp+A1]
...
mem_insnAN[sp+AN]
sp=sp-4 // sp_insnB
mem_insnB1[sp+B1]
...
10 matches
Mail list logo