Back-port revision 194909 to google/gcc-4_7 branch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194909
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Google ref: b/7427993
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/crash28.C
ok.
thanks,
David
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
Back-port revision 194909 to google/gcc-4_7 branch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194909
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Google ref: b/7427993
Index:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
ok.
The patch as sent caused some breakage, I had to adjust test cases a bit.
Submitting attached patch.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/crash28.C
I saw only one test case fix patch from Paolo in trunk. Does this
patch include more local fixes?
David
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
ok.
The patch as sent caused some
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
I saw only one test case fix patch from Paolo in trunk. Does this
patch include more local fixes?
There was an earlier patch which touched g++.dg/parse/error1{1,2}.C:
r191712 | paolo | 2012-09-25 07:44:52 -0700 (Tue,
ok.
thanks,
David
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhni...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
I saw only one test case fix patch from Paolo in trunk. Does this
patch include more local fixes?
There was an earlier