Hi Paul,
The patch is ready to go. Please correct the following tiny nits:
I have corrected those.
s/Check that en expression/Check that an expression/
s/Set this if resolution has already happened and it could be
harmful/Set this if resolution has already happened. It could be
harmful/
Hi Thomas,
The patch is ready to go. Please correct the following tiny nits:
s/Check that en expression/Check that an expression/
s/Set this if resolution has already happened and it could be
harmful/Set this if resolution has already happened. It could be
harmful/
An even tinier, probably igno
Am 23.10.18 um 23:02 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
So, I think this should be clear for trunk now. I will supply
the documentation later.
Ping ** 0.571428 ?
Am 23.10.18 um 18:16 schrieb Dominique d'Humières:
Anyway, the attached patch fixes this,
It now gives the error
4 |integer, parameter :: I_FINDLOC_BACK(1) = findloc([1,1],1, &
|1
Error: transformational intrinsic 'findloc' at (1)
> Le 22 oct. 2018 à 23:00, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
>
> Hi Dominique,
>
>> With your patch, compiling the following test
>> program logtest3
>>implicit none
>>logical :: x = .true.
>>integer, parameter :: I_FINDLOC_BACK(1) = findloc([1,1],1, &
>> back=x)
>> end program logtes
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 23:01, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Anyway, the attached patch fixes this, plus the print *, instead
> of test for return values, plus the whitespace issues mentioned
> by Bernhard. Patch gzipped this time to let it go through to
> gcc-patches.
Thanks, The few remainin issues ar
Hi Dominique,
With your patch, compiling the following test
program logtest3
implicit none
logical :: x = .true.
integer, parameter :: I_FINDLOC_BACK(1) = findloc([1,1],1, &
back=x)
end program logtest3
gives an ICE
I sometimes wonder where you get all these test cases fro
Hi Thomas,
With your patch, compiling the following test
program logtest3
implicit none
logical :: x = .true.
integer, parameter :: I_FINDLOC_BACK(1) = findloc([1,1],1, &
back=x)
end program logtest3
gives an ICE
gfc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 signal t
Hi,
again rejected due to being overly large...
The whole message can be found at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-10/msg00102.html
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: [patch, fortran] Implement FINDLOC
Datum: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 19:36:35 +0200
Von: Thomas Koenig
An: fort
