On 06/08/11 22:51, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve
Here is a patch to skip gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c on platforms that define
STRICT_ALIGNMENT. It adds a new check_effective routine,
check_effective_target_strict_align that looks for a warning that will
only be produced on platforms that define STRICT_ALIGNMENT.
Technically, the test may not work if the
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
* gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-require-effective-target strict_align.
Isn't the
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
* gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-supports.exp
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
