On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:
This patch normalizes more bitmap function names.
sbitmap.h
TEST_BIT - bitmap_bit_p
SET_BIT - bitmap_set_bit
I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became
bitmap_test_bit() ? I never particularly liked the lispy
On 11/1/12, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:
This patch normalizes more bitmap function names.
sbitmap.h
TEST_BIT - bitmap_bit_p
SET_BIT - bitmap_set_bit
I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became