Re: [patch] Normalize more bitmap function names.

2012-11-01 Thread Diego Novillo
On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote: This patch normalizes more bitmap function names. sbitmap.h TEST_BIT - bitmap_bit_p SET_BIT - bitmap_set_bit I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became bitmap_test_bit() ? I never particularly liked the lispy

Re: [patch] Normalize more bitmap function names.

2012-11-01 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 11/1/12, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote: On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote: This patch normalizes more bitmap function names. sbitmap.h TEST_BIT - bitmap_bit_p SET_BIT - bitmap_set_bit I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became