Hi!
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:46:48 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:03:40PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:38:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
The reason for 3 separate arrays is that some of the values
are always
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:51:43PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
OK for gomp-4_0-branch, and trunk (without the first hunk, obviously)?
commit 1f4dbb1842804b39c3b7ac1e80783734516dc965
Author: Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com
Date: Thu Dec 19 12:41:21 2013 +0100
Add clobber
Hi!
This one's owed to me still learning about GCC internals; if someone
could please be so kind to poit me to the appropriate documentation, or
explain:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:38:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
The reason for 3 separate arrays is that some of the values
are
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:03:40PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
This one's owed to me still learning about GCC internals; if someone
could please be so kind to poit me to the appropriate documentation, or
explain:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:38:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:21:57PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:58:26 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd indeed prefer if you just used one
array, it can be say just uchar array of twice the width, with even chars
for alignment and odd for kinds (or
Hi!
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:58:26 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd indeed prefer if you just used one
array, it can be say just uchar array of twice the width, with even chars
for alignment and odd for kinds (or vice versa), compared to two arrays
it is tiny bit cheaper at the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:41:02AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Here is the patch I propose for gomp-4_0-branch; OK?
No. The reason for 3 separate arrays is that some of the values
are always variable, some are sometimes variable (sizes), some are
never variable (alignment + kind).
So, if
Hi!
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:38:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:41:02AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Here is the patch I propose for gomp-4_0-branch; OK?
No. The reason for 3 separate arrays is that some of the values
are always variable, some are
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 05:35:36PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Sure, that's fine by me, and thanks for the explanation.
Plus, the change, being an ABI change, would need to be done on the
trunk rather than just on gomp-4_0-branch.
It's not an ABI change, as I had limited the change to
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:53:02 +0100, I wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
3) I figured out we need to tell the runtime library not just
address, size and kind, but also alignment (we won't need that for
the #pragma omp declare target global
Hi!
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
3) I figured out we need to tell the runtime library not just
address, size and kind, but also alignment (we won't need that for
the #pragma omp declare target global vars though), so that the
runtime library can
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
3) I figured out we need to tell the runtime library not just
address, size and kind, but also alignment (we won't need that for
the #pragma omp declare
Hi!
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:02:30 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
3) I figured out we need to tell the runtime library not just
address,
13 matches
Mail list logo
