On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 13:58 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/14 10:56, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
So, generally I like it. It looks pretty much like what I'd expect from
this kind of work.
So it sounds like Richi really prefers the explicit casting rather than
member functions. It seems
On 04/22/2014 10:17 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
or indeed, something like:
else if (gimple_switch switch_stmt =
dyn_cast gimple_switch (stmt))
{
to avoid an 83-character-wide line :)
Hope that's the appropriate way to split such a line; I
On 04/22/14 15:38, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/22/2014 10:13 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
On 04/21/14 10:56, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_switch): New subclass of
gimple_statement_with_ops, adding the invariant that
stmt-code == GIMPLE_SWITCH.
(gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_switch): New.
On 04/23/2014 12:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/14 15:38, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/22/2014 10:13 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:32:24PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/23/2014 12:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/14 15:38, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/22/2014 10:13 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
partition_t partition,
}
else if (gimple_code
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
partition_t partition,
}
else if (gimple_code (stmt) ==
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:13 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
partition_t partition,
On 04/22/2014 10:13 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
partition_t partition,
}
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
partition_t partition,
}
else if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_SWITCH)
{
+ gimple_switch
11 matches
Mail list logo