On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
[...]
I'd rather get away from using a global main_identifier_node, instead
On Mar 20, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[?]
Well. To make this work in LTO the main function (thus, the program
entry point)
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[…]
Well. To make this work in LTO the main function (thus, the program
entry point) should be marked at cgraph level and all users of
MAIN_NAME_P should instead check a flag on the cgraph
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[…]
Well. To make this work in LTO the main function (thus, the program
entry point) should be marked at cgraph level and all users of
On Mar 20, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[…]
Well. To make this work in LTO the main function (thus, the program
entry point)
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[…]
Well. To make this work
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
[…]
I'd rather get away from using a global main_identifier_node, instead
make that frontend specific, and introduce targetm.main_assembler_name
which the assembler-name creating langhook would make sure to use
when mangling what the FE
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
[…]
I'd rather get away from using a global main_identifier_node, instead
make that frontend specific, and introduce targetm.main_assembler_name
which the assembler-name creating
On Mar 20, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
[…]
I'd rather get away from using a global main_identifier_node, instead
make that frontend specific, and introduce
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Hi,
the code to call expand_main_function currently only checks DECL_NAME.
This leads
to a hack in ada/gcc-interface/utils.c to
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Hi,
the code to call expand_main_function currently only checks DECL_NAME.
This
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Hi,
the code to call expand_main_function currently only checks DECL_NAME. This
leads
to a hack in ada/gcc-interface/utils.c to handle the gnatbind generated file
that could
declare:
package ada_main is
…
function my_main
(argc
12 matches
Mail list logo
