Re: [Ping, PATCH, Fortran, 79229, v1] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

2017-02-19 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Jerry, hi all, thanks for the review. Committed as r245581. Regards, Andre On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 08:58:46 -0800 Jerry DeLisle wrote: > On 02/19/2017 08:42 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > Ping! > > > > this time with correct PR number: 79229. > > > > On Tue, 7

Re: [Ping, PATCH, Fortran, 79229, v1] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

2017-02-19 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 02/19/2017 08:42 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Ping! this time with correct PR number: 79229. On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:31:22 +0100 Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi all, attached patch fixes the issue of 79229 (which is not a regression). The issue was that the code generating the

Re: [Ping, PATCH, Fortran, 79229, v1] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

2017-02-19 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Ping! this time with correct PR number: 79229. On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:31:22 +0100 Andre Vehreschild wrote: > Hi all, > > attached patch fixes the issue of 79229 (which is not a regression). > The issue was that the code generating the checking was expecting a > pointer type, but