Re: dejagnu version update?

On 10/27/2021 5:00 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 18:32:24 +0200 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 21:08, Mike Stump wrote: On May 16, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: The change I care about in 1.5.3 So, we haven't talked much

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 18:32:24 +0200 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 21:08, Mike Stump wrote: > > > > On May 16, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > The change I care about in 1.5.3 > > > > So, we haven't talked much about the version people want most.

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 7 August 2018 18:34:30 CEST, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:25:49AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > >> Since g++ already requires 1.5.3, it make no sense to bump to > >anything older that 1.5.3,

Re: dejagnu version update?

Hi, On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > How come? > > If one wants to develop on a distro that is notoriously outdated then > you have to obtain the missing pieces yourself. It's not about developing on an "notoriously outdated" distro, but about _testing_ on it. There are

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 08/08/18 12:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 7 August 2018 18:34:30 CEST, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:25:49AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >>> Since g++ already requires 1.5.3, it make no sense to bump to >> anything older that 1.5.3, so let's bump to 1.5.3.

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 7 August 2018 18:34:30 CEST, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:25:49AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >> Since g++ already requires 1.5.3, it make no sense to bump to >anything older that 1.5.3, so let's bump to 1.5.3. Those packaging >systems and OSes that wanted to update by

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:25:49AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > Since g++ already requires 1.5.3, it make no sense to bump to anything older > that 1.5.3, so let's bump to 1.5.3. Those packaging systems and OSes that > wanted to update by now, have had their chance to update. Those that punt >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Aug 4, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 21:08, Mike Stump wrote: >> >> On May 16, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> The change I care about in 1.5.3 >> >> So, we haven't talked much about the version people want most. If we >> update,

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 at 17:32, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > debian-stable (i think 9 ATM), Ubuntu LTS ship versions recent enough > to contain both fixes. Commercial distros seem to ship fixed versions, > too. The CentOS 7.4.1708 version on gcc112 doesn't seem to be fixed.

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 21:08, Mike Stump wrote: > > On May 16, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > The change I care about in 1.5.3 > > So, we haven't talked much about the version people want most. If we update, > might as well get something that more people care about. 1.5.3 is in

Re: dejagnu version update?

On May 16, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The change I care about in 1.5.3 So, we haven't talked much about the version people want most. If we update, might as well get something that more people care about. 1.5.3 is in ubuntu LTS 16.04 and Fedora 24, so

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 16.05.2017 05:35, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 16 May 2017 at 14:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 16 May 2017 at 13:13, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> 1.5.0 wouldn't buy us anything as the "libdirs" handling is only in 1.5.2 >>> and later. >> >> Ah I missed

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 16 May 2017 at 14:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 16 May 2017 at 13:13, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> 1.5.0 wouldn't buy us anything as the "libdirs" handling is only in 1.5.2 >> and later. > > Ah I missed that in the earlier discussion. > > The change I care about

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 16 May 2017 at 13:13, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > 1.5.0 wouldn't buy us anything as the "libdirs" handling is only in 1.5.2 and > later. Ah I missed that in the earlier discussion. The change I care about in 1.5.3 is

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 16 May 2017 11:54:18 CEST, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >On 13 May 2017 at 11:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >wrote: >>> I guess neither redhat >>> (https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/dejagnu/ redirects

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 13 May 2017 at 11:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> I guess neither redhat >> (https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/dejagnu/ redirects to a >> login page but there seem to be 1.5.1 packages) nor SuSE did update dejagnu

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Mai 15 2017, Mike Stump wrote: > That said, a little surprising that SLE is lagging everyone else so > hard. DejaGnu doesn't exactly have frequent releases. Missing just one release can easily put you more than 5 years behind. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab,

Re: dejagnu version update?

On May 15, 2017, at 1:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > Both SLE-11 and SLE-12 use dejagnu 1.4.4, so does openSUSE Leap 42.[12]. > Tumbleweed uses 1.6 so new SLE will inherit that. But I still do all > of my testing on systems with just dejagnu 1.4.4. So dejagnu is

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:09 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 05/13/2017 04:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: I guess

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/13/2017 04:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> >>> I guess neither redhat >>> (https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/dejagnu/ redirects to a

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 05/13/2017 04:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: I guess neither redhat (https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/dejagnu/ redirects to a login page but there seem to be 1.5.1 packages) nor SuSE did update dejagnu in the

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:24:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > I guess neither redhat > (https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/dejagnu/ redirects to a > login page but there seem to be 1.5.1 packages) nor SuSE did update dejagnu > in the meantime. Fedora has dejagnu-1.6 in

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:50:12PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On September 15, 2015 10:05:27 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote: > >On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > >>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM,

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 16/09/15 17:36, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> >> >> On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: >>> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab >>> wrote: Mike Stump writes: > The software presently

Re: dejagnu version update?

Mike Stump writes: > The software presently works with 1.4.4 and there aren’t any changes > that require anything newer. SLES 12 has 1.4.4. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 09:23 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump > wrote: >> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 3:01:47 PM GMT+02:00, Matthias Klose wrote: >On 09/15/2015 09:23 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump > wrote: >>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote:

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Mike Stump writes: > >> The software presently works with 1.4.4 and there aren’t any changes >> that require anything newer. > > SLES 12 has 1.4.4. Would be nice to cover them as well, but their

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Mike Stump writes: >> >>> The software presently works with 1.4.4 and there aren’t any changes >>> that require anything newer. >> >> SLES 12 has 1.4.4. > >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: Mike Stump writes: The software presently works with 1.4.4 and there aren’t any changes that require

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and install it as part of > the source tree? TL;DR: No. We could, and indeed, some people do

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 7:39:42 PM GMT+02:00, David Malcolm wrote: >On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: >> >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 16, 2015 7:57:03 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: >On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> >> Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > >> Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:39:42PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > AIUI, we specifically need >= 1.5.3 (or a version with a backport) to > get support for multiple load_lib paths mentioned by Bernhard, which is > what motivated this thread (on gcc-patches, before it spread to the gcc > list): We

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> >> Sorry about the obvious (possibly dumb) question. > >> Can't we just import a copy of dejagnu each year and install it

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Where Joseph said he'd wait some more.. I had thought I asked longer ago than > that, time flies if one has fun. > > I'd just require 1.5.3 just to avoid the time needed by folks to workaround > those silly

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:36:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > > > >On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > >>On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab > >>wrote: > >>>Mike Stump writes: > >>> >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > > > > On 16/09/15 17:14, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Schwab > >> wrote: > >>> Mike Stump writes: > >>> > The

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Sep 15, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Given we haven't updated the dejagnu reqs since ~2001, I think stepping > forward would be appropriate and I'd support moving all the way to 1.5.3 with > the expectation that we'll be on a cadence of no faster than 2 years going >

dejagnu version update?

On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous >> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) > I'd support that as a direction. > > Certainly dropping the 2001 version from our website in favor

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: >On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >>> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous >>> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) >> I'd

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 01:23 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On September 15, 2015 7:39:39 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required > >> dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous > >> load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) > > I'd support that as a direction. > >

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required dejagnu version to allow for getting rid of all these superfluous load_gcc_lib? *blink* :) I'd

Re: dejagnu version update?

On September 15, 2015 10:05:27 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote: >On 09/15/2015 01:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 10:39 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: >>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Maybe GCC-6 can bump the required >