Reformulated as per your suggestion, and retested.
OK to commit?
--Douglas Rupp
2011-06-07 Douglas B Rupp r...@gnat.com
* fixincludes/configure.ac (AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS): Add.
* fixincludes/configure: Regenerate.
* fixincludes/config.h.in: Regenerate.
---
Dear Daniel,
thank you for the review.
Daniel Kraft wrote:
+ fputs (lock-variable=, dumpfile);
+ if (c-expr1 != NULL)
+ show_expr (c-expr1);
Why do you dump lock-variable= in any case, while you only print the
names for the other arguments only if present?
The lock variable
On 06/08/2011 08:02 AM, Douglas B Rupp wrote:
Reformulated as per your suggestion, and retested.
OK to commit?
Yes, thanks!
Paolo
This patch completes the removal of the public part of the
Traditional Objective-C runtime API from libobjc.
From now on, the only supported API is the Modern API. :-)
If you are removing exported functions from libobjc.so, you should
bump VERSION= in libobjc/configure.ac.
Yes, sure
This patch completes the removal of the public part of the
Traditional Objective-C runtime API from libobjc.
From now on, the only supported API is the Modern API. :-)
If you are removing exported functions from libobjc.so, you should
bump VERSION= in libobjc/configure.ac.
Yes, sure
-innovation.com
+ * objc/objc.h (__GNU_LIBOBJC__): Bumped to 20110608.
+
+2011-06-08 Nicola Pero nicola.p...@meta-innovation.com
+
* configure.ac (VERSION): Bumped to 4:0:0.
* configure (VERSION): Likewise.
Index: objc/objc.h
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:25:09AM +0100, Nicola Pero wrote:
This patch completes the removal of the public part of the
Traditional Objective-C runtime API from libobjc.
From now on, the only supported API is the Modern API. :-)
If you are removing exported functions from
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Please review the attached two patches.
In the first patch, gate functions are cleaned up. All the per
function legality checks are moved into the executor and the
optimization heuristic checks (optimize for size)
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The dump-pass patch with test case.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
David
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Please review the attached two patches.
In the first patch, gate
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Ok for google/main. A good candidate patch for trunk too.
Well, it's still not a hard limit as we can't tell how many spill slots
or extra call argument or return value slots we need.
Richard.
Thanks,
David
On
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The following is the patch that does the job. Most of the changes are
just removing TODO_dump_func. The major change is in passes.c and
tree-pass.h.
-fdump-xxx-yyy-start -- dump before TODO_start
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Hello Richard,
On 06/06/2011 11:55 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com
wrote:
OK, the only difference is that we don't have the node analyzed here,
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/19/2011 01:33 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The cleanest way to account for this seems to allow overriding
USE_LINKONCE_INDIRECT in target headers (darwin.h in this case).
If Jason or Richard consider this appropriate, I'll modify the patch
accordingly
Hi Richard,
I have a patch for PR43864. The patch adds a gimple level duplicate block
cleanup. The patch has been bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64, and
reg-tested on ARM. The size impact on ARM for spec2000 is shown in the following
table (%, lower is better).
none
On 06/08/2011 11:42 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
I'll send the patch with the testcases in a separate email.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
2011-06-08 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
PR middle-end/43864
* gcc.dg/pr43864.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr43864-2.c: New test.
Index:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tom de Vries vr...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
I have a patch for PR43864. The patch adds a gimple level duplicate block
cleanup. The patch has been bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64, and
reg-tested on ARM. The size impact on ARM for spec2000 is
When erroring on a section type conflict print both locations.
This makes it a lot easier to track them down, especially in LTO.
This is still not quite good before it prints only one
conflict pair currently instead of all, but at least all
the problems can be fixed iteratively now.
Better would
Add another sandy bridge model number.
Passes bootstrap test suite on x86_64-linux. Ok for trunk and
4.6?
2011-06-6 Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu):
Add model 0x2d Intel CPU.
---
gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c |1 +
1
Print location for conflicting global regs when warning
about them. Otherwise it's hard to track down where they are.
To review: I hope the way I use the garbage collector for the global
variable is ok?
Passes bootstrap test suite on x86_64-linux. Ok to commit?
2011-06-06 Andi Kleen
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
-mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-6.C
gcc.dg/torture/arm-fp16-ops-5.c
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
When erroring on a section type conflict print both locations.
This makes it a lot easier to track them down, especially in LTO.
This is still not quite good before it prints only one
conflict pair currently instead of
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Print location for conflicting global regs when warning
about them. Otherwise it's hard to track down where they are.
To review: I hope the way I use the garbage collector for the global
variable is ok?
Passes bootstrap
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tom de Vries vr...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
I have a patch for PR43864. The patch adds a gimple level duplicate block
cleanup. The patch has been bootstrapped and
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 14:12, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Gabriel Charette gch...@google.com wrote:
We need to stream TREE_TYPE for identifier node.
That seems unlikely,
On 08/06/11 03:14, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 06/07/2011 06:25 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 06/07/2011 02:07 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
Several tests in gcc.target/arm use dg-options with -mcpu=, which
On 06/08/2011 11:11 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com wrote:
Hello Richard,
On 06/06/2011 11:55 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com
wrote:
OK, the only
Looking at the remaining Tru64 UNIX testsuite failures, I noticed that
the gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp tests are built with -fno-common
on PA HP-UX. Since Alpha Tru64 UNIX is often similar, I tried this and
in fact most of the failures are gone. The single one in
On Thu, 26 May 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:
Yes please. I've been arguing for that for some time.
Since you feel so strongly about it and nobody objects, go ahead.
Backport to open branches? (And note PR48825.)
brgds, H-P
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed.
Paolo.
///
2011-06-08 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/ext/extptr_allocator.h: Include ext/numeric_traits.h
instead of limits.
* include/bits/allocator.h: Likewise.
* include/std/chrono
On 08/06/11 12:56, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:
Yes please. I've been arguing for that for some time.
Since you feel so strongly about it and nobody objects, go ahead.
Backport to open branches? (And note PR48825.)
brgds, H-P
I think we have
Hello!
2011-06-6 Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
2011-06-08 ...
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu):
Add model 0x2d Intel CPU.
OK with updated ChangeLog entry.
Thanks,
Uros.
In my last patch I ggc_freed a tree that was used in tinst levels,
leading to GC corruption when a tinst level is saved in a pending
template. This patch avoids that by not freeing if we've allocated a
pending template.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit
The last libffi failure on Tru64 UNIX is libffi.call/huge_struct.c:
FAIL: libffi.call/huge_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/huge_struct.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/huge_struct.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/huge_struct.c -Os execution test
FAIL:
Hi,
This patch supports unknown Intel family 0x6 CPUs. OK for trunk and
4.6 branch?
Thanks.
H.J.
--
2011-06-08 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Support
unknown Intel family 0x6 CPUs.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch supports unknown Intel family 0x6 CPUs. OK for trunk and
4.6 branch?
Thanks.
H.J.
--
2011-06-08 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Support
Since you feel so strongly about it and nobody objects, go ahead.
Backport to open branches? (And note PR48825.)
I've already given my OK, it's up to the branch managers to apply as
they see fit.
Hi,
in the following series of patches I want to reorganize handling of alises in
cgraph infastructure.
The longer term plan is to introduce symbol table into GCC that will be common
base for cgraph, varpool and aliases (i.e. all kinds of symbols we have in
GCC).
Original design of
Hi!
This is something I've already briefly talked about in my GCC Summit talk.
E.g. given a simple testcase like:
volatile int vv;
static __attribute__((noinline)) int
foo (int x, int y, int z)
{
int a = x * 2;
int b = y * 2;
int c = z * 2;
vv++;
return x + z;
}
int
bar (int x)
{
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 03:38, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 14:12, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Gabriel Charette gch...@google.com
Hi,
This fixes a testsuite failure with 20041011-1.c where we are
generating out of range adr instructions because a splitter goes awry
because we didn't consider the mvn case in const_ok_for_op.
So we ended up splitting this
movdi reg:r1 0x
to
(insn 370 21 371 (set (reg:SI 2 r2)
On 06/08/2011 03:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 08/06/11 03:14, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 06/07/2011 06:25 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 06/07/2011 02:07 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
Several tests in
On 06/08/2011 03:17 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
-mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-6.C
+davidxl
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Patch Description:
=
I am working on a project to do global function layout in the linker where
the linker reads the callgraph edge profile information, generated by FDO,
and uses that to
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
ok for google/main.
Thanks, the patch is now committed.
David
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
+davidxl
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Sriraman Tallam
There's a lot of dead code inside the obsolete (removed in 2009)
and nowhere else set #ifdef FORBIDDEN_INC_DEC_CLASSES.
Remove and poison?
I'd say borderline obvious, but maybe there's instead reason to
reinstate it, if that code is tested and supposed to be live.
brgds, H-P
Hi,
Target HAVE_INITFINI_ARRAY support was added by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-11/msg00387.html
Unfortunately, it checks if host supports init_array/fini_array
sections, not target. It will generate wrong result for cross compiler.
This patch uses the target compiler instead of
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The following is the patch that does the job. Most of the changes are
just removing TODO_dump_func. The major change is in passes.c and
This patch adds code to the cse_sincos pass to expand builtin cabs (x)
into sqrt (r*r + i*i), where r = realpart(x) and i = imagpart(x). This
is usually handled by fold_builtin_cabs; however, PR49302 shows a case
where compile flags of -O0 -flto combined with link flags of -O2
-ffast-math allow
On Jun 8, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
But - you're right that we should bump it, so I bumped it :-)
I suppose we could bump it again when we get into phase 3, when we're finished
with the changes.
No. The next number is for the next release, and ideally, we want to sit on it
for
No. The next number is for the next release, and ideally, we want to sit on
it for another 10 years or so. We offer no compatibility before the RM says,
done with the release. Up until then, you can twiddle, after that, no more
changes to the abi, though, you can bug fix it.
Sounds
Hi!
We shouldn't recurse in GC to mark tinst_level chain,
it is IMHO better to iterate through the chain instead.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?
2011-06-08 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* cp-tree.h (struct tinst_level): Add chain_next GTY
Hi!
This testcase suffered from the same issues as cdtor-1.C testcase recently.
Fixed thusly, regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk
as obvious.
2011-06-08 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR testsuite/49323
* g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/integer-typedef.C: Add
This patch to the Go frontend fixes a dumb mistake I made: I compared
the TYPE_SIZE pointers rather than the actual type size. Bootstrapped
and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to
mainline.
Ian
diff -r 292aa99c6436 go/expressions.cc
--- a/go/expressions.cc Tue May 31
On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
The big question is whether such a test should be run for all multilibs
that might possibly pass the test, or only for default and for mulitlibs
that provide the same options.
Here, reasonable people may disagree. I suspect in the end, we'll
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
That seems unlikely, as identifiers do not have a type. There is some
TREE_TYPE abuse in cp-tree.h, perhaps you should find out what you're
streaming.
It's used by the C++ parser, so it needs to be streamed in pph.
Yes, but you should not
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
I'm worried by this whole approach of command-line checking.
Right, and this was essentially my point originally. Luckily there is enough
beef I think behind the curtains to do everything that needs doing without
worrying about adding yet
On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The Darwin parts of the previous versions have already been approved,
but I'd appreciate if Mike could have a look at the changes. Ok for
mainline?
Ok.
OK.
Jason
On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-apple-darwin9.8.0.
powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 bootstrap is still running. Unfortunately,
Darwin seems to be exceedingly unreliable under load: tests randomly
time out and work again the next time. This
Here is a patch to skip gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c on platforms that define
STRICT_ALIGNMENT. It adds a new check_effective routine,
check_effective_target_strict_align that looks for a warning that will
only be produced on platforms that define STRICT_ALIGNMENT.
Technically, the test may not work if the
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
* gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-require-effective-target strict_align.
Isn't the
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
* gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-supports.exp
On 06/08/2011 12:30 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
The big question is whether such a test should be run for all multilibs
that might possibly pass the test, or only for default and for mulitlibs
that provide the same options.
Here, reasonable people
Update the test suite to reflect recent fixes and merges from trunk.
The following changes happened in this patch.
Conversion of a compilation failure to an assembly diff failure:
remove the dg comments and add the comment // pph asm xdiff
Conversion of a ICE to a BOGUS
change the
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com
On 6/7/11, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
After getting new failures due to an unrelated fix, I think this will
be more trouble than it's worth.
First, we can't get rid of the XPASSes, so those will always be noisy.
Remove all the noise with:
sed -e '
/-fpph-map=pph.map/
I have written a test for this patch and run it (it works correctly). I
guess there is no reason why it should not be accepted now.
To recap, this patch add a void * data field to the pragma handler,
allowing to pass extra data. If we want to use this field, we need to
use the function
49107 is an issue with the addition of noexcept to the standard library
causing extra instantiations, to the point that code that worked before
doesn't work now due to circular dependency. Someone suggested that to
avoid this problem we could defer instantiation of noexcept-specifiers
until
Running the testsuite in C++0x mode caught this issue.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
commit b531be395b85f7872c51e79ffb5db9a30a2a4f66
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Jun 2 14:35:59 2011 -0400
* semantics.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Handle
Some builtin macros are more builtin than others. In particular, front-end
builtin macros are weaker than libcpp builtin macros, and should not be
processed with the libcpp builtin tools.
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.pph
2011-06-08 Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com
*
This patch removes a number of functions from the ObjC/ObjC++ testsuite
next-encode-assist
files which are never used in the testsuite ... and will never be, since they
have been removed
from the GNU runtime. ;-)
The next-encode-assist provides a compatible implementation for the NeXT
runtime
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 15:09, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
Some builtin macros are more builtin than others. In particular, front-end
builtin macros are weaker than libcpp builtin macros, and should not be
processed with the libcpp builtin tools.
Nice! This fixes a whole chunk of C
this is the patch that just removes the TODO_dump flag and forces it
to dump. The original code cfun-last_verified = flags
TODO_verify_all looks weird -- depending on TODO_dump is set or not,
the behavior of the update is different (when no other todo flags is
set).
Ok for trunk?
David
On Wed,
This patch (trivially) updates the libobjc documentation to state
that the Traditional Objective-C runtime API is no longer available.
Committed to trunk.
Thanks
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 174821)
+++ ChangeLog
Hi,
My patch r174586 on trunk was a bit incomplete and causes
PR49305 on sh2a target. The attached patch is to fix it.
Tested on sh-elf and sh4-unknown-linux-gnu and applied on
trunk.
BTW, when looking into PR, I noticed that we forgot to utilize
32-bit mov.w instructions on sh2a while 32-bit
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Nicola Pero wrote:
This patch removes a number of functions from the ObjC/ObjC++ testsuite
next-encode-assist
files which are never used in the testsuite ... and will never be, since they
have been removed
from the GNU runtime. ;-)
OK to commit ?
Ok.
The bootstrap breaks in stage1 when trying to build libgcc for
multilib (this is sparc-unknown-linux with --enable-targets=all):
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/davem/src/GIT/GCC/build-sparc-linux/gcc'
mkdir -p -- sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc
Checking multilib configuration for libgcc...
No functional changes in this patch. Additional cleanups after the
various trunk merges and old code removal patches.
Tested on x86_64. Committed to branch.
Diego.
Fix spurious differences with trunk.
* c-parser.c (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Remove call to
This fixes the ICE that Gab ran into while calling cp_debug_parser on a
test case.
We were not handling the case of empty token buffers and when the
caller set the starting token to NULL.
Additionally, the window of tokens to print was too small to be of any
real use.
* parser.c
This is a fairly simple re-factoring that simplifies the TS_* marking
code, but it changes how the C++ front end marks the tree codes, so
I'm looking for an explicit approval.
There are no functional changes. The code in
initialize_tree_contains_struct moves to mark_ts_structures_for and
It seems like you're changing to mark a lot of things as TS_COMMON that
previously were only TS_TYPED or even only TS_BASE.
Jason
First, a ping for
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00136.html;
updated regclass documentation. Ok?
Second, I updated the CRIS port to fit the proposed
documentation update (adding a class as the patch you sent, but
more complete), with regtest results clean for revisions before
the
On 06/08/2011 03:31 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
The rest are all in cp/. It looks like g++ uses TREE_TYPE as a cache
for name lookups. Perhaps Jason can comment. Obviously not a front end
I know very well, but let's look at them one at a time:
cp/cp-tree.h: (DECL_CONV_FN_P (FN) ? TREE_TYPE
Hi,
This small patch fixes the printable name typo in treestruct.def.
I've committed as it is obvious.
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-06/msg00083.html)
2011-06-09 Mingjie Xing mingjie.x...@gmail.com
* treestruct.def (TS_TYPE_DECL): Fix the printable name typo.
Index: treestruct.def
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This removes the (undocumented) support for SETJMP_VIA_SAVE_AREA from the
compiler.
Poison it (in system.h)?
brgds, H-P
86 matches
Mail list logo
