On Jun 2, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 30, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 30, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
I have 3 different, mutually exclusive patches that fix PR 48866. The
problem is exponential time while dealing with
On Jun 6, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2011, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
It might be too late for DF to do anything sensible to preserve the
debug info rather than just throw it away, as your partial approval
suggests.
OK, let me think about this
This patch is a small improvement to DF, for an issue I noticed while
investigating PR 50826. We take note of, and may emit debug temps for,
REGs for which we won't emit REG_DEAD/REG_UNUSED notes. This is a
waste, removed with this patch.
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. Ok
On Jun 3, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
According to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01082.html
on Nov 20, 2009, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 19, 2009, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact this exchanging of the LHS (or
On Oct 27, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
pr43165.c -Os -g exercises a bug in df-problems WRT the introduction of
debug temps. After pro_and_epilogue, the function was optimized to this:
push bp
mov bp,sp
# debug insn referencing bp
pop bp
I don't know why we bother to
On Jun 3, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:47 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=677681 can be
“fixed” by disabling the artificial dependency of a debug insn on its
previous insn.
Debug insns will often depend
On May 4, 2011, Revital1 Eres e...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Hello Alexandre
I think this will restore proper functioning to SMS in the presence of
debug insns. A while ago, we'd never generate deps of non-debug insns
on debug insns. I introduced them to enable sched to adjust (reset)
debug insns
This both eliminates bogus failures in the testsuite on SPARC64/Linux when you
configure --with-cpu=v8 and enables more tests on SPARC/Solaris (which is by
default configured --with-cpu=v9).
Tested on SPARC64/Linux and SPARC/Solaris, applied on mainline and 4.7 branch.
2012-04-09 Eric
Hi,
in Ada record (structure) types can have a variable size and, in this case, the
debug info contains -1 as size attribute for the type. While the long term
plan is to support general expressions as size attribute, a small step forward
is to accept simple variables, which is an important
Hi,
with the numerous checks generated in Ada, the gimplification process can
generated dead branches that aren't easily eliminated at -O0 and can impair
the debugging experience. We have found that unconditionally cleaning up the
CFG before emitting the prologue/epilogue can help in some
Hello!
As pointed out by Eric, there is this little detail in the
documentation w.r.t sign and zero-extending conversions:
For all conversion operations, X must not be `VOIDmode' because the
mode in which to do the conversion would not be known. The conversion
must either be done at
This patch cleans up the diagnostic initialization of the C-family
FEs. It keeps the default of no line-wrapping. It moves together all
initializations and deletes code that has no effect.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86-unknown-linux-gnu with
enable-languages=all,ada,obj-c++.
OK?
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012, at 7:56 PM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
There seems to be tacit agreement that the
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch cleans up the diagnostic initialization of the C-family
FEs. It keeps the default of no line-wrapping. It moves together all
initializations and deletes code that has no effect.
Bootstrapped and
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
They can affect shared memory in some ways like a call, but don't have many
of the other attributes of call. They are really more like an assignment or
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:50:02AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
for gcc/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com
PR debug/51570
* var-tracking.c (expand_depth): New type.
(onepart_aux, expand_loc_callback_data): Change depth type to it.
Doug == Doug Evans d...@google.com writes:
Doug On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net
wroteDoug btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib - src/contrib?
Doug [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could* use
Doug the one in, e.g.,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Doug == Doug Evans d...@google.com writes:
Doug On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net
wroteDoug btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib - src/contrib?
Doug [instead of gdb having its
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Doug Evans wrote:
btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib - src/contrib?
[instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could* use
the one in, e.g., src/contrib. I don't have a strong opinion. I'm
just looking for others opinions, as the topic came
Isn't the gimple cfg-cleanup we run post optimization (right before
expansion) not enough? Or the cfg-cleanup we perform right after expansion
now? At least if the branches are really caused by the gimplification
process I would expect things to be cleaned up at this point, no?
At least the
Hi all,
here is a simple patch for a problem recently reported by Andrew
Benson: Procedure pointers inside a module don't receive the proper
name mangling, which can lead to name collisions (as the test case
demonstrates).
The patch fixes this and regtests cleanly on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
Hi,
I have made a new patch to only have two builtins :
* __builtin_cpu_is (CPUNAME)
* __builtin_cpu_supports (FEATURE)
apart from the cpu init builtin,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2012 12:43, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
* c-common.h (c_common_initialize_diagnostics):
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
Release managers,
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I'd like to make the change below which helps with lower resolution
systems (or non-maximized web browsers) or larger font sizes.
Practically I think
Hi,
this patch fixes several different ICEs related to handling aliases in WHOPR
partitioning. It took me over week debug this, but when variable alias
is added to a boundary and its destination is not added, we get queue of
unforutnate events where the destinatoin gets analyzed and added at
Attached patch applied to 4_7-branch.
2012-04-09 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org
PR libstdc++/52476
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_M_rehash_aux): Add.
(_Hashtable::_M_rehash): Use the latter.
*
): New.
(pp_base_get_prefix): New.
* common.opt (fdiagnostics-show-caret): New option.
* doc/invoke.texi (fdiagnostics-show-caret): Document it.
testsuite/
* lib/prune.exp: Add -fno-diagnostics-show-caret.
caret-diagnostics-20120409.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi, thanks for the reply.
On 4/8/12 6:25 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Character pairs like this don't seem very extensible, in that you are
providing meanings for any even-length string, rather than (for example)
only a limited subset of strings leaving room for meanings to be assigned
later to
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
If the agreement is that arm 32-bit softfp really needs to be installable
alongside 32-bit hardfp (and alongside aarch64), then IMHO it should do it
like all other
On 9 April 2012 20:25, François Dumont wrote:
I don't think I have the necessary rights to close the PR on bugzilla, I
haven't been able to do so.
You should be able to using your @gcc.gnu.org account. What if you
assign it to yourself first?
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
This patch propagates execution count of thee case labels of a
switch-case statement after its expansion. Bootstraps and all
tests pass. OK for trunk?
Hi,
this adds generic support for __builtin_bswap16 (only PowerPC has it for now).
It is mapped to the bswap optab in HImode, whose implementation is as follows:
- if a bswaphi2 pattern is present (PowerPC), it is directly used; or else
- if a rotlhi2/rotrhi2 pattern is present (x86), it is
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
On a second thought, it might be better to simplify those cases in
the .md file, where low/high subregs are used by using 'gen_highpart'
and 'gen_lowpart' for example, instead of checking the endianness over
and over again.
I'm trying out a couple of
On 04/09/2012 04:01 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
* It uses the default cutoff as max_width, whatever it is (as
controlled by -fmessage-length).
* It uses the pretty-printer. The text cannot (should not) wrap
because we still print only max_width chars at most.
Hmm, I think if pp_line_cutoff
On Monday 09 April 2012 16:48:06 Adam Conrad wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
If the agreement is that arm 32-bit softfp really needs to be
installable alongside 32-bit hardfp (and alongside aarch64), then
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 07:14:45PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
again, saying /lib/tuple/ldso isn't multiarch is bunk. but it sounds
like you're fine with /libhf/, so there isn't anything left to thrash about
there.
I appreciate your careful reading of my email and the issues I outlined,
On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This fixes PR52571, we should not align DECL_COMMON variables as
they might be pre-empted by a definition with lower alignment.
I added this to the PR:
Ah, I had another thought. COMDAT and LINKONCE things I don't think can be
realigned
Hello,
The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
Tested against rev. 186243 with
sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
-m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}
and no new failures.
Test
The current 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 branches are now seriously broken for all
PA target due to the fix applied for PR middle-end/52640, an optimization
fix. This is because the PA backend defers output of function descriptors
and externals (hpux) using TARGET_ASM_FILE_END. As a result,
Hi,
I checked in this patch, which has been approved in PR.
H.J.
---
Index: config/pa/pa.opt
===
--- config/pa/pa.opt(revision 186256)
+++ config/pa/pa.opt(working copy)
@@ -138,9 +138,3 @@ Generate PA1.1 code
mspace-regs
I'd like to remove execute permissions for:
gcc/ada/*.adb
Ok?
Remove execute permissions from gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.dg/dll-8.c: Remove execute permissions.
* g++.dg/ext/dllexport5.C: Likewise.
On Apr 9, 2012, at 23:03, Mike Stump wrote:
I'd like to remove execute permissions for:
gcc/ada/*.adb
Ok?
Sure. What about *.ads?
-Geert
On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote:
I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand
why a unique location for linkers is helpful, useful, and important for
some other people's use cases, but you either didn't read or chose to
ignore why using multilib
On Thursday 05 April 2012 12:25:09 Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:55:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
note: i don't care about /lib/ld-linux-hf.so.3 or /lib/ld-linux.so.4 or
/libhf/ld-linux.so.[34]. /lib/triplet/ldso is really the only one i
don't think doesn't belong.
On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tbh, i thought the ldso discussion was more we've been talking about this for
a long time, so let's just go with XXX and then people moved on to the next
topic (which was defining exactly what hard float abi meant wrt compiler
flags). further, it
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 00:16:34 Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tbh, i thought the ldso discussion was more we've been talking about
this for a long time, so let's just go with XXX and then people moved
on to the next topic (which was defining exactly what
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:57AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote:
I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand
why a unique location for linkers is helpful, useful, and important for
some other people's use
* g++.dg/cpp0x/udlit-raw-op.C: Don't use CRLF endings.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp59.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp60.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp60.c
===
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp60.c (revision
Em 9 de abril de 2012 17:48, Adam Conrad adcon...@debian.org escreveu:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
If the agreement is that arm 32-bit softfp really needs to be installable
alongside 32-bit
So, I'd like to change all the ada testcases to use normal unix line endings.
testsuite/gnat.dg/taft_type2_pkg.ads
is an example if one such file, any objections?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:17:36AM +, Adam Conrad wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:57AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote:
I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand
why a unique location for linkers is
On Apr 9, 2012, at 8:39 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
On Apr 9, 2012, at 23:03, Mike Stump wrote:
I'd like to remove execute permissions for:
gcc/ada/*.adb
Ok?
Sure. What about *.ads?
I assume that was a friendly, please feel free to fix *.ads as well.
Fixed:
* a-assert.ads: Remove
53 matches
Mail list logo
