On 19 January 2014 03:12:56 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
while comparing LTO and non-LTO builds I noticed that with LTO we produce a lot
more vtables in datal.rel.ro rather than data.rel.ro.local
This is because of partitioning promoting more symbols global. For RTL we make
section
The xtensa port uses __xtensa_libgcc_window_spill in libgcc to implement
__builtin_frame_address. This symbol is local/hidden in libgcc. This is not a
problem when linking against static libgcc. But g++ defaults to
-shared-libgcc, thus breaking link against C++ shared libraries that are using
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:15 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
For LEA operation with SImode_address_operand, which zero-extends SImode
to DImode, ix86_split_lea_for_addr turns
(set (reg:DI) ...)
into
(set (reg:SI) ...)
We need to do
(set (reg:DI) (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI)))
at
One test tests for integer vectorisation so requires vect_int. Two others
already had the dg-require-effective-target, but it was before the dg-do
rather than after.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu, where it fixes the vect.exp failures.
Applied as obvious.
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/testsuite/
*
Hi,
On 01/19/2014 06:52 AM, Tim Shen wrote:
Regex like a** will throw an unexpected exception. Now fixed (but
currently no optimizations on it).
Booted and tested with -m64 and -m32 respectively.
Ok. Please remove 2013 as copyright year for the tescase. I also think
you can avoid the
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
while comparing LTO and non-LTO builds I noticed that with LTO we produce a
lot
more vtables in datal.rel.ro rather than data.rel.ro.local
This is because of partitioning promoting more symbols global. For RTL we make
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:15 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
For LEA operation with SImode_address_operand, which zero-extends SImode
to DImode, ix86_split_lea_for_addr turns
(set (reg:DI) ...)
into
(set (reg:SI)
The attached patch fixes these bugs and adds the tests. See the PRs for =
the rationale of the changes.
Regression tested on x86_64-apple-darwin13 and powerpc-apple-darwin9.
OK for trunk, 4.8.3, and 4.7.4 (after testing)?
Regards,
Dominique
CL
Description: Binary data
patch-59774t
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
For LEA operation with SImode_address_operand, which zero-extends SImode
to DImode, ix86_split_lea_for_addr turns
(set (reg:DI) ...)
into
(set (reg:SI) ...)
We need to do
(set (reg:DI) (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI)))
at
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
For LEA operation with SImode_address_operand, which zero-extends SImode
to DImode, ix86_split_lea_for_addr turns
(set (reg:DI) ...)
into
(set
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:30 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
For LEA operation with SImode_address_operand, which zero-extends SImode
to DImode, ix86_split_lea_for_addr turns
(set (reg:DI) ...)
into
(set (reg:SI) ...)
We need to do
(set (reg:DI) (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI)))
at
Add -ffat-lto-objects to pr54240.c to fix an UNRESOLVED on the scan-tree-dump.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu and applied.
There's a similar failure for octeon2-pipe-1.c but I'm going to fix that
in a different way.
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/mips/pr54240.c: Add
We don't compile to RTL or machine instructions for lean LTO objects,
so the scan-assembler tests force -ffat-lto-objects to be used instead.
This patch extends that to scan-rtl-dump*.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu, where it fixes an UNRESOLVED on
gcc.target/mips/octeon2-pipe-1.c. OK to install?
The MIPS %hi and %lo relocation operators act as a pair on REL targets;
you need to see the partnering %lo in order to calculate the addend for
a %hi and detect carries properly. The assembler therefore complains if
%hi is used without a corresponding %lo.
The MIPS backend tries to remove
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:37:18AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Review ping for this patch. IMO it almost counts as obviously correct
but just in case...
Kito Cheng k...@0xlab.org writes:
expand_movstr is work fine when we don't define movstr
The following patch fixes PR59860 by removing the only folding
builtins.c does that can end up recursing to GIMPLE call stmt
folding. It does that via strcat - strlen + strcpy folding
and then folding the strlen gimple stmt via gimplify which
then can use the SSA web to fold that to a constant
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 07:05:12PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The following patch fixes PR59860 by removing the only folding
builtins.c does that can end up recursing to GIMPLE call stmt
folding. It does that via strcat - strlen + strcpy folding
and then folding the strlen gimple stmt via
The attached change fixes a segmentation fault bootstrapping GCC on
hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11.
The length of long non-pic millicode calls does not depend on
TARGET_LONG_ABS_CALL.
As a result, the length of long non-pic millicode calls was being
overestimated.
This broke the millicode call to
Hello!
Alpha needs -mno-explicit-relocs to count number of function calls properly.
2014-01-19 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* g++.dg/pr49718.C: Add -mno-explicit-relocs for alpha*-*-* targets.
Tested on alphaev6-pc-linux-gnu and committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
Index: g++.dg/pr49718.C
On 10/01/14 11:28, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi Eric,
Thank you for your suggestion!
I have made the adjustment and test it. Please check the new attachment.
Regards,
Renlin Li
On 10/01/14 10:42, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This patch will resolve testsuite/gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c failure
observed in
aarch64
On 01/19/2014 06:24 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
The attached patch fixes these bugs and adds the tests. See the PRs for =
the rationale of the changes.
Regression tested on x86_64-apple-darwin13 and powerpc-apple-darwin9.
OK for trunk, 4.8.3, and 4.7.4 (after testing)?
Regards,
Yes OK, and I will commit for you.
Thanks Jerry.
While trying to back port the patch, I have found a leftover of my previous
attempts:
if (ft != FMT_F before == 0 w 0 d == 0 p == 0)
should be
if (ft != FMT_F w 0 d == 0 p == 0)
The second change was needed for 4.7 (still one
So here is another patch proposal with the faulty debug assertion
commented for the moment.
2014-01-20 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org
* scripts/create_testsuite_files: Add testsuite/experimental in
the list of folders to introspect for tests.
*
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Ok. Please remove 2013 as copyright year for the tescase. I also think you
can avoid the auxiliary includes.
Oops, fixed, including fixing incorrect file name :)
Tested and committed.
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
commit
Hi,
when compiling:
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return 42;}
};
int test (void)
{
struct A a, *b=a;
return b-foo();
}
We wind up the following useless EH:
int test() ()
{
int D.2235;
int (*__vtbl_ptr_type) () * D.2236;
int (*__vtbl_ptr_type) () D.2237;
struct A a;
Ping
-Original Message-
From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 16:28
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH][4.8] Backport strict-volatile-bitfields fixes to 4.8
4.8 has a number of strict-volatile-bitfields issues that can be fixed by
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, Tae Wong wrote:
It will be better if you have enabled the Launchpad account seotaewong40.
This account has been suspended for renaming an answer title multiple times.
The GCC team has nothing to do with Launchpad.
There's also an ordering error on the GCC maintainer
Hi Jakub,
I have fixed all the issues you have mentioned below. I am also
attaching a fixed patch along with ChangeLog entries. I have also rebased the
patch to the trunk revision r206786.
Is this Ok to install?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From:
28 matches
Mail list logo
