for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-06-19 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Set default for --param allow-...-data-races to off.
* params.def (PARAM_ALLOW_LOAD_DATA_RACES,
PARAM_ALLOW_STORE_DATA_RACES
-strapped and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-06-20 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Fix include path for in-tree cloog.
* config/cloog.m4 (CLOOG_INIT_FLAGS): Remove bogus include path
and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with all languages,
including Ada.
OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-06-22 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (associate_plusminus): For widening conversions
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:44:18, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:18:47PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
from a recent discussion on g...@gcc.gnu.org I have learned that the default
of
--param allow-store-data-races is still 1, and it is causing problems
Hi Martin,
Well actually, I am not sure if we ever wanted to have a race condition here.
Have you seen any impact of --param allow-store-data-races on any benchmark?
It's trivially to write one. The only pass that checks the param is
tree loop invariant motion and it does that when it
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:40:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that several testcases in the GMP-4.3.2 test suite are failing now
which
did not happen with GCC 4.9.0. I debugged the first one, mpz
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:27:59, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/22/14 01:14, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that several testcases in the GMP-4.3.2 test suite are failing now
which
did not happen with GCC 4.9.0. I debugged the first one, mpz/convert, and
found
the file mpn/generic
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:12:47, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:40:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:22:13, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I noticed that several testcases in the GMP-4.3.2 test suite are failing now
which did not happen with GCC 4.9.0. I debugged the first one,
mpz/convert, and found the file mpn/generic/get_str.c was miscompiled.
mpn/get_str.c.132t.dse2:
point types.
Thus _Sat is only allowed with _Frac or _Accum. I have not seen anything
different, for instance a vector, with saturation yet.
OK for trunk after boot-strap regression-test?
Thanks
Bernd.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-06-24 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin
for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-06-25 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (associate_plusminus): For widening conversions
check for undefined overflow in (T)(P + A) - (T)P - (T)A.
Issue a strict overflow
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:43:46, Richard Biener wrote:
On June 26, 2014 12:03:21 AM CEST, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:14:31PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/24/14 14:19, Martin Jambor wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote
by semicolons.
Boot-strapped and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-07-15 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR rtl-optimization/61461
* sched-vis.c (print_pattern) ADDR_VEC, ADDR_DIFF_VEC: Fixed
Ping...
From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: richard.guent...@gmail.com; hubi...@ucw.cz
Subject: RE: [PING**2] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd edition
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:23:41 +0100
Ping again...
Thanks.
Hello Jan-Benedict,
Hi!
This patch updates the files taken from Automake. Committed.
MfG, JBG
the updated version of missing will confuse the gmp-4.3.2 configure
script if it is installed in-tree with contrib/download_prerequisites
and flex is not installed:
...
checking readline
Aehm Kirill,
excuse me please, but if I do
autogen Makefile.def
I get this from svn diff
Index: Makefile.in
===
--- Makefile.in (revision 217890)
+++ Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -35238,9 +35238,6 @@
$(SHELL)
Hi Ilya,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:44:40, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Nov 19:19, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
so, did you really regenerate Makefile.in in that patch, or am I missing
something ?
You're right. This patch was rebased so many times, that we may forget to
regenerate it before
.
2014-11-22 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* Makefile.def (module=gmp): Work around in-tree gmp configure bug with
missing flex.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
patch-gmp.diff
Description: Binary data
cgraph_node, which inherits from
symtab_node. Both functions are
not declared virtual. Is that what's intended? Usually this could lead to
errors, or at least some serious
compiler warnings.
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-10-07 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin
script,
and previously that emitted an error message and created a dummy
lex.yy.c, The new version of that script does no longer create any
lex.yy.c.
[...]
2014-11-22 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* Makefile.def (module=gmp): Work around in-tree gmp configure
bug with missing flex
patch for review.
Boot-strapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
Can you, please, send the updated patch?
Sorry for late review,
Honza
2014-11-25 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR ipa/61190
Hi,
this patch fixes PR58893, which is an access to uninitialized memory, which may
or may not crash in
linemap_resolve_location, or just print error messages with bogus location.
When the first -include file is processed we have the case, where
pfile-cur_token == pfile-cur_run-base, this is
-Strapped and Regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu
Ok for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-09-26 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR preprocessor/58893
* errors.c (cpp_diagnostic): Fix possible out of bounds access
2014 11:42:29 +0200
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:48:44, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/26/14 06:21, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR58893, which is an access to uninitialized
memory, which may or may not crash in
linemap_resolve_location, or just print error messages
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:40:58, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/27/14 03:53, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Comment before this change. Someone not familiar with this code is
going to have no idea why these two lines exist.
Ok, I added a comment now, do you like it?
Yes.
Please try to include
Hi Jeff,
as you know, this test case takes too long to complete if the test suite is run
with
this command line:
MALLOC_PERTURB_=237 make -k check
The reason was found in libcpp/charset.c, where a reallocation is done one byte
at a time.
It seems to be in the macro expansion of this
-10-07 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR ipa/61190
* cgraph.h (symtab_node::call_for_symbol_and_aliases): Fix comment.
(cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_and_aliases): Likewise.
(cgraph_node::call_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases_1): New function
Ping...
see: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00536.html
Hi Honza,
as you know, we have a wrong code bug, when a pure or const method is called
via a virtual thunk.
I had some more Ideas, how to fix that, but all of them had some serious
draw-backs, so I leave the details
and uses r0 for the result.
Boot-strapped and Regression-tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf and x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.2014-03-31 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR fortran/60191
* fortran/trans-types.c
, and this can still go into 4.9.0.
Boot-Strapped without any regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
gcc:
2014-04-08 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* fortran/class.c (gfc_build_class_symbol): Append _t
unique again.
I hope it is not too late, and this can still go into 4.9.0.
Boot-Strapped without any regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
gcc:
2014-04-08 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* fortran
Lin,
are you still working on this?
Thanks
Bernd.
Hi Lin,
thanks for clarifying this.
If you say you can't sign the FSF copyright assignment,
we can't use your patch, I'm afraid.
Well, I was curious how to proceed, because these unaligned
stm instructions are also a problem under linux.
The test cases don't fail, because the exception handler
Hi Lin,
Seem we are not talking the same problem.You should first make sure
what has been going wrong first.
Maybe I misunderstood your point.
And I will sign it.
--
Regards
lin zuojian
Ok, then please do it.
Once you have signed it, and got the approval by a global GCC reviewer,
I
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:50:24, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Bernd Edlinger wrote:
this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
target
classes end with _t, and target array classes
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:15:16, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
Thanks for the commit. However, can you
Bernd.
2014-04-11 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR fortran/60718
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Fix a strict aliasing
violation when passing a class object to a formal parameter which has
the target
Hi Teresa,
@@ -1947,7 +1947,7 @@ remove_bb (basic_block bb)
fprintf (dump_file, Removing basic block %d\n, bb-index);
if (dump_flags TDF_DETAILS)
{
- dump_bb (dump_file, bb, 0, dump_flags);
+ dump_bb (dump_file, bb, 0, dump_flags ~TDF_DETAILS);
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Edlinger wrote:
It was caused by a strict aliasing violation, when passing a value of the
type
class(x),pointer to a formal procedure parameter of the type
class(x),target.
I assume a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:04:51, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hmm,
I was hoping somehow that only that test case is broken,
and needs to be fixed. The target
Hi Lin,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:29:14, Lin Zuojian wrote:
Hi Bernd,
I have my copyright mark signed and the process has completed. Now I
am going to answer two more questions before my patch can be
commited right?
Did you copy any
files or text written by someone else in these changes?”
Hi Jakub,
I can take that task over and will boot-strap with all languages and run the
test suite on my armv7-linux-gnueabihf system.
But that will take until next week as it is currently occupied with other tests.
Can you please review Lin's latest patch and give your OK for check-in on trunk
should IMHO go.
Richard.
--
Eric Botcazou
2014-04-16 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Remove parameter keep_aligning from get_inner_reference.
* tree.h (get_inner_reference): Adjust header.
* expr.c (get_inner_reference
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:09:28, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I still have that already-approved patch, updated to current trunk.
I've successfully boot-strapped it on armv7-linux-gnueabihf with
all languages enabled, including Ada.
The test suite runs cleanly without any drop-outs.
Thanks
for trunk and 4.9 branch?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-04-30 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Work around for current cygwin32 build problems (Bug gas/16858).
* config/i386/cygming-crtbegin.c (__register_frame_info
Hi Rainer,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:10:48, Rainer Orth wrote:
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de writes:
2014-04-30 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Work around for current cygwin32 build problems (Bug gas/16858).
* config/i386/cygming-crtbegin.c (__register_frame_info
Opps...
this time with the attachment.
Hi Rainer,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:10:48, Rainer Orth wrote:
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de writes:
2014-04-30 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Work around for current cygwin32 build problems (Bug gas/16858).
* config/i386
Ping...
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:49:37 +0200
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:04:51, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hmm,
I was hoping somehow that only that test case
it is only defined when windows.h is included.
Boot-strapped under Cygwin32 and Cygwin64.
OK for trunk and 4.9.1 branch?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-05-10 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Fix current cygwin build problems.
* seh_init.c
on Cygwin-32 and Cygwin-64.
OK for trunk and 4.9.1?
Thanks
Bernd.
boehm-gc/ChangeLog:
2014-05-11 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Fix current cygwin-64 build problems.
* include/gc_config_macros.h (GC_PTHREADS): Use __CYGWIN__ instead
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 14 May 2014 09:28:55, Eric Botcazou wrote:
So does this remove the last concern around Bernd's patch?
And can we remove TYPE_ALIGN_OK as followup? (ISTR it's used
by obj-c/c++ as well, but I can't find such use)
Probably but, as previously indicated, I need to do some
Hi Jan,
looks good. Thanks!
Bernd
On Mon, 26 May 2014 21:07:28 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
From: hubi...@ucw.cz
To: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
CC: hubi...@ucw.cz; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: aarch64 build broken
Hi Jan,
r210901 | hubicka | 2014-05-25 00:00:14 +0200 (So, 25.
if this patch should also go into the 4.9 branch, after a while of
course.
What do you think?
Thanks
Bernd.
patch-expr.diff
Description: Binary data
2014-05-27 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* expr.c (expand_assignment): Fold
Hi,
On Tue, 27 May 2014 11:06:21, Richard Biener wrote:
But the coment previously read
/* A constant address in TO_RTX can have VOIDmode, we must not try
to call force_reg for that case. Avoid that case. */
and you are removing that check. So I guess you want to retain
GET_MODE (XEXP
exactly the same logic.
Boot-strapped regression-tested in x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-05-27 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
* expr.c (expand_assignment): Fold the bitpos in the to_rtx if
sufficiently aligned
Honza,
I try to build this configuration:
../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/ed/gnu/arm-linux-gnueabihf-linux64
--target=arm-linux-gnueabihf --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,ada
--with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=hard
but make fails:
libtool:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 May 2014 22:36:17, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On the other hand, the alias created ought to inherit properties form its
target, so yes, we probably want to copy flags that matters, including
DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P. We however should not copy DECL_INITIAL - we never have
constructors for
Hi Kai,
this patch also mis-compiles binuitls-2.24 on x86_64.
In the function walk_wild_consider_section (ld/ldlang.c)
a tail-call gets miscompiled:
The stack frame is cleaned up, but now the jump target is invalid.
0x0040c801 +193: add $0x28,%rsp
0x0040c805 +197:
-Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks
Bernd.
2014-06-02 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR ipa/61190
* cgraphunit.c (expand_thunk): Don't try to output the thunk for
a virtual base class via
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization levels, except -O0 and -Og. This probably started with gcc
Burnus wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:39:57PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:37:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hmm,
I was hoping somehow that only that test case is broken,
and needs to be fixed. The target attribute is somehow simple,
it implies intent
Hi,
this patch fixes PR 61047, where rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1
incorrectly assumes, that all SP-relative offsets can be safely
read witout causing any traps. And therefore such references
are safe to be moved out of an if-block.
This patch tries to get safe lower and upper bounds where accesses
are
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:36:25, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Btw, I wonder if we can simply mark the MEMs generated from spill code
with MEM_NOTRAP_P so we can remove the special casing of
frame-pointer-based addresses from add while properly initializing
MEM_NOTRAP_p from rtx_addr_can_trap_p?
Spill
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:50:29, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Btw I am not sure at all, why argp-references can never be dangerous?
For instance in a struct with an array inside, passed as function argument?
IMO there cannot be any definitive solution to this issue until after we move
all the affected
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:49:13, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Btw, I wonder if we can simply mark the MEMs generated from spill code
with MEM_NOTRAP_P so we can remove the special casing of
frame-pointer-based addresses
in paragraph
@strong{53}
I am not sure how to handle that without paragraph numbers,
maybe like this:
See documentation in the sources of the run time mentioned in the previous
paragraph.
2014-06-14 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR ada/61505
* gnat_rm.texi: Fix errors
Hi Honza,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:12:10, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:06:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi,
the test case g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C is mis-compiled with with all
optimization
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:08:33, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:08 AM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks ok to me, but can you add a testcase please?
I have a testcase, but if -flto the testcase doesn't include *any*
definition of the test function, just all the LTO
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:56:15, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:44 PM, BIll Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
As described in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542, a
new test case (gcc.dg/vect/vect-nop-move.c) was added in 4.9. This
exposes a
about a configure
option to set default?
Thanks,
Joey
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:45:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
On, Fri, 10 Jan 2014
Ping...
this is still open,
in short, the configuration
../gcc-4.9-20140202/configure --prefix=/home/ed/gnu/arm-linux-gnueabihf-cross
--host=arm-linux-gnueabihf --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,ada --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9
--with-fpu=vfpv3-d16
.2014-02-06 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR middle-end/60080
* cfgexpand.c (expand_asm_operands): Attach source location to
ASM_INPUT rtx objects.
* print-rtl.c (print_rtx): Check for UNKNOWN_LOCATION.
patch-pr60080.diff
Description: Binary
Hi,
this test case fails on ARM, because this target has by default unsigned char
type.
Attached please find my proposed (almost obvious) fix for this,
by using signed char, instead of char alone.
Boot-Strapped and tested on X86_64 and ARM.
Thanks
Bernd.
Hi,
the test case gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f was found to fail on
armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf.
The reason for this is that one out of 6 loops does not get vectorized, because
this target does
not support a vectorization of sqrtf.
The same test case is known to fail on powerpc-apple-darwin9
the required mode.
Regards
Bernd Edlinger.
intent to make it right.Making it best is next task.
--
Regards
lin zuojian.
于 2014年02月28日 15:47, Bernd Edlinger 写道:
Hi,
I see the problem too.
But I think it is not necessary to change the stack alignment
to solve the problem.
It appears to me that the code in asan_emit_stack_protection
Ping.
Subject: [PATCH] Fix fortran/pr60236
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:50:46 +0100
Hi,
the test case gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f was found to fail on
armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf.
The reason for this is that one out of 6 loops does not get vectorized,
because this target does
not
Ping again...
Thanks.
From: bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
To: hubi...@ucw.cz
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; richard.guent...@gmail.com
Subject: [PING] [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/61190, 2nd edition
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:40:56 +0200
Ping...
see:
-fno-strict-overflow. The test case looks pretty constructed anyway.
The patch was boot-strapped and regression tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu and
X86_64-linux-gnu
OK for trunk?
Regards
Bernd Edlinger2013-08-28 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:54:22, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
The lim pass (aka loop invariant motion) can move conditional expressions
with
possible undefined behavior out of the if statement inside a loop which may
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 202117)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-08-30 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
+
+ * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
+
2013-08-27
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:47:21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
The choice appears to be to continue to have broken volatile bitfields
on ARM with no way for users to make them conform to the ABI, or to
change things so that they conform
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:34:51 Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
This patch fixes a bug in the vectorized pointer arithmetic in the forwprop
optimization pass.
Although it seems to be impossible to create a vector of pointers
platform.
Regards
Bernd Edlinger2013-09-03 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Implement -Wportable-volatility warning to warn about
code which accesses volatile structure members for
which different ABI specifications exist
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:56:22 Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 09/02/2013 03:10 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Can someone, in a new thread, ping the patches that are still in
flight? ISTR having approved bits of some patches before my leave.
Here's the current state of the patch set I put together. I've
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:30:22, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 01/09/13 14:10, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
IMHO the AAPCS forbids packed structures. Therefore we need not
interfere
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:53:10, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
This is a follow-up patch for Sandra Loosemore's patch in this
thread: reimplement -fstrict-volatile-bitfields, v3.
It was already posted a few weeks ago
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:20:04, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
The trouble is that AAPCS semantics are incompatible with the default GNU
semantics for non-packed structures as well - AAPCS
strict-volatile-bitfields is only compatible with --param
allow-store
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:29:02, DJ Delorie wrote:
I fully agree with you, the current default state of
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields should be disabled for all targets.
Please don't do that until gcc produces code that does the same
things. Most of my targets rely on gcc not doing the old
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:31:50, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Now I think this is good opportunity for a simple heuristic:
If a statement is at loop level 1 we can move it out of the loop,
regardless of the fact
and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Bernd.2013-09-05 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR tree-optimization/58137
Use POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for vector of pointer additions.
* tree-cfg.c
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:25:08, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
this would cause an ICE in test case 2629-1.c...
Well, that's easily fixable.
So removing the pointer of vectors is not an option.
Let me nevertheless
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:48:13, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
I think the warning can be completely implemented inside struct-layout.c
for example in finish_bitfield_representative (if you pass that the first
field
in the group, too). Of course that is at
and the 4.8 / 4.7 branch?
Regards
Bernd Edlinger2013-09-06 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR middle-end/57748
* expr.c (expand_assignment): Check for out of bounds
access to structures.
testsuite:
* gcc.dg/torture/pr57748-1
Just for completeness, these were the test examples on
this private communication:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:19:18, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Richard,
But the movmisalign path skips all this code and with the
current
:
2013-08-08 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR target/58065
* config/arm/arm.h (MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT): Define.
maybe we should first backport this one.
Yesterday someone did that on the linaro branch,
but maybe /branches/gcc-4_8-branch should be updated as well?
Bernd.
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:32:29, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Richard,
But the movmisalign path skips all this code and with the
current code thinks
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:43:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:32:29, Martin Jambor wrote:
The misalignp path was added by you during the 4.7 development to fix
PR 50444 which was indeed about
While it is straight forward to remove the movmisalign path in 4.9 and 4.8,
this is not so simple in the 4.7 branch. The reason is that 4.7 uses
to_rtx = expand_normal (tem); while 4.8 and 4.9 use
to_rtx = expand_expr (tem, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
which does almost the same, but
, but there were none.
OK for trunk?
Regards
Bernd.2013-09-15 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
PR middle-end/57748
* expr.c (expand_assignment): Remove misalignp code path.
Check for bitregion in offset arithmetic
1 - 100 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
