Some of the solution to PR71767 is incomplete, and we need finer-grained
control over whether symbols need to be made linker-visible. This is a
preparation patch, providing the flag.
tested on x86_64-darwin16, applied to mainline.
thanks
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-11-10 Iain Sandoe
Hi
These tests currently fail on targets without Intel assembler support.
Tested that they are now UNSUPPORTED on x86_64-darwin, which does not
have -masm=intel support.
pushed to master as trivial/obvious.
thanks
Iain
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/amxbf16-asmintel-1.c: R
Hi
When we are lexing tokens for Objective-C, we combine '@' tokens
with a following keyword (when that keyword is a valid Objective-C
one or, for Objective-C, one of the C++ keywords that can appear in
this position). The responsibility is passed on to the parser to
validate the resulting combin
Hi
The reference implementation for Objective-C provides the SEL
typedef (although it is also available from ).
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu
pushed
thanks
Iain
gcc/objc/ChangeLog:
* objc-act.c (synth_module_prologue): Get the SEL identifier.
* objc-act.h (enum objc_
Hi
The new version of Darwin report pagesize 16384 which means that we
need to adjust the aligment of the PCH area.
tested across the Darwin range (32 and 64 bit hosts) and on x86_64-linux-gnu
pushed to master
thanks
Iain
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/host-darwin.c: Align pch_address_space to
Hi,
It looks like the next macOS release is imminent.
Tested across the Darwin patch, and on x86_64-linux-gnu,
pushed to master
thanks
Iain
--
As per Nigel Tufnel's assertion "... this one goes to 11".
The various parts of the code that deal with mapping Darwin versions
to macOS (X) versio
Hi
This is preparatory work for bringing at least one aspect of the
Objective-C implementation up to date.
Tested on a number of Darwin revisions, and x86_64-linux-gnu
pushed to master,
thanks
Iain
---
At present, we are missing parsing and checking for around
half of the property attribute
Hi,
Some system headers apply visibility attributes to Objective-C
@interface declarations. Those are “default”, but still need to be
accepted.
tested across the Darwin patch and on x86_64-linux-gnu,
pushed to master,
thanks
Iain
-
This passes visibility through without warning (so that, f
Hi
Originally, I had this as a Darwin-only patch, however GNUStep
also makes use of NSObject and similar constructs, so this really
needs to be available to linux-gnu as well.
tested across several Darwin versions and on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for the c-family changes?
thanks
Iain
=
This att
Hi
Arguably, this is actually a bug fix since the ‘atomic’ attribute is
paired with the ‘nonatomic’ one. However it is the default and was
omitted when the @property implementation was added.
‘atomic’ in Objective-C terms is not specified in relation to _Atomic
or std::atomic (the _Atomic keywor
Hi
The patch omitted a change for Ada, fixed thus.
tested on x86_64-darwin,
pushed to master as obvious/bootstrap fix.
thanks
Iain
gcc/ada/ChangeLog:
* gcc-interface/misc.c (gnat_printable_name): Change
DECL_IS_BUILTIN -> DECL_IS_UNDECLARED_BUILTIN.
---
gcc/ada/gcc-interface/mi
Andreas Schwab wrote:
../../gcc/ada/gcc-interface/misc.c: In function 'const char*
gnat_printable_name(tree, int)':
../../gcc/ada/gcc-interface/misc.c:562:47: error: 'DECL_IS_BUILTIN' was
not declared in this scope
if (verbosity == 2 && !DECL_IS_BUILTIN (decl))
should be fixed by
https:
Hi,
For Objective-C++/C, we cater for the possibility that a class interface
(@interface) might be preceded by prefix attributes. In the case of
Objective-C++, the reference implementation (a.k.a. clang) also allows
(and combines) prefix attributes that precede a linkage specification
(but only o
Hi
** Actually, this was originally posted during last stage-1, but I forgot to
keep
pinging it…
At present, the output of .cfi_personality and .cfi_lsda assumes
ELF semantics for indirections. This isn't suitable for all targets
and is one blocker to moving Darwin to use .cfi_.
T
Hi
The builtin_thread_pointer test does not work for emulated TLS.
Add a target requires to cover this.
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu
pushed to master,
Iain
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/builtin_thread_pointer.c: Require native TLS.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target
Hi
(this change reused the existing ‘class’ keyword and RID, so only
needed Objective-C context modifications).
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu,
pushed to master,
thanks
Iain
This attribute states that a property is one manipulated by class
methods (it requires a static variable
Hi Richard,
Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,
I?ve been carrying this patch around on my Darwin branches for a very long
time?
tested across the Darwin patch and on x86_64-linux-gnu,
OK for master?
thanks
Iain
= commit message
If an interface is marked
Hi Jospeh,
Joseph Myers wrote:
> This patch seems to be missing documentation for the new attribute in
> extend.texi.
Apologies, for that omission, revised patch includes the documentation and
also addresses Richi’s comments.
documentation patch tested with “make pdf” and visual inspection of
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Law wrote:
This attribute allows pointers to be marked as pointers to
an NSObject-compatible object. This allows for additional
OK with a suitable update to documentation. I have no idea the
attribute is supposed to do.
Joseph ack’d this and I applied it to master ..
..
resending - the first & second attempt didn’t seem to make it to gcc-patches.
Hi
This option allows the user to specify alternate C++ runtime libraries,
for example when a platform uses libc++ as the installed C++ runtime.
It is the same spelling as a clang option that allows that to use libstd
Hi,
The PR notes that our inability to parse these keywords in GNU Objective-C
is one of the contributing factors to being unable to use some important
system
headers (at least, on Darwin platforms).
tested on x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux-gnu,
OK for the C-family changes?
thanks
Iain
— com
(aonther re-send, no sign of the message on patches archive)
Hi
As reported on irc, some tex tools don’t like @r{} commands being
split.
For the record, I tried a number of things to wrap the line:
1/ putting the @r{} on the line after the @item
that didn't work - the (Objective-C and Object
Hi,
The test needs to use Object rather than NSObject on this and earlier
OS versions. Although the PR reports against the GNU runtime, we run
this on NeXT as well.
tested on x86_64-darwin11 and x86_64-darwin16
pushed to master,
thanks
Iain
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* objc.dg/pr23214.m:
Hi Martin,
Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/6/20 8:54 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
+/* Provide a dummy type for the RID enum used as an argument to
+ objc_prop_attr_kind_for_rid () */
+enum rid { DUMMY };
+
I've noticed the hunk caused the following -Wodr warning:
../libdecnumber/libdecnum
Hi
The changes in r11-4799 introduced a dummy enum rid type with
a different initial member name to the actual version (an ODR
violation). Fixed by including the header declaring the
actual type.
tested --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto on Linux and
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-noplugin o
Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/16/20 10:00 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
../../gcc/c-family/stub-objc.c:30: note: an enum with different value
name is defined in another translation unit
30 | enum rid { DUMMY };
I’m not disagreeing, of course (and will sort it out)..
.. but I don’t see this
wrote:
> On 09/01/20 12:39 +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> +#ifndef _GLIBCXX_EXPERIMENTAL_COROUTINE
>> +#define _GLIBCXX_EXPERIMENTAL_COROUTINE 1
>
> Did you mean to leave EXPERIMENTAL in this macro?
no, dropped.
>>
>> + template struct coroutine_traits
>
>
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Iain Sandoe writes:
>> 2020-01-09 Iain Sandoe
>>
>> * cp-demangle.c (cplus_demangle_operators): Add the co_await
>> operator.
>
> Please add something to libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected. Thanks.
done***,
OK no
Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/3/19 6:42 AM, Kamlesh Kumar wrote:
ChangeLog Entries:
---
2019-11-02 Kamlesh Kumar
* cp-demangle.c (d_expr_primary): Handle
nullptr demangling.
* testsuite/demangle-expected: Added test.
This test is failing in at least some pl
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:50:03PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> Given the proposed intention to use non-standard refspecs for private
>> and vendor branches I've written some notes on how to use these.
>>
>> It would be helpful if someon
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 01:31:13PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Why would people want to name their local branches "me/thing" instead
of just "thing", btw?
it’s a way of making things distinct and allows the push rule
Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
On Wed, 15.01.2020, 14:30:43 EET Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi David,
I've rebased and squashed the analyzer patch kit and squashed patch 2
of the hash_table fix into it, and re-tested it successfully, so I've
pushed it to master (as 757bf1dff5e8cee34c0a75d06140ca972bfecfa7).
Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> + gassign *get_res = gimple_build_assign (lhs, done);
>>> + gsi_replace (gsi, get_res, true);
>>> + *handled_ops_p = true;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> + return NULL_TREE;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Main entry poin
I have a merge commit to devel/c++-coroutines, which is intended to refect
the state at the point of commit to trunk.
However, I cannot push that commit because:
remote: *** This update introduces too many new commits (284), which would
remote: *** trigger as many emails, exceeding the current
Hi Folks,
Joel Brobecker wrote:
You should include Joel on such questions as the expert on the hooks.
I don't know whether there's something to put in the commit message to say
"allow this merge of more than 100 commits". I don't think a squashed
merge is the right workaround, supposing you
e CD we worked to.
[C++ coroutines 6] Testsuite.
There are two categories of test:
1. Checks for correctly formed source code and the error reporting.
2. Checks for transformation and code-gen.
The second set are run as 'torture' tests for the standard options
set,
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 12:53:48PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Thanks.
Shouldn't this be mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
?
* This is not enabled by default (even for -std=c++2a), it needs
-fcoroutines.
And, if this is the pl
Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:02 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 12:53:48PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Thanks.
Shouldn't this be mentioned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html
?
* This is not enabl
Hi Bin,
bin.cheng wrote:
The patch sets current_function_returns_value flag in templates for all
co_return/co_yield/co_await cases, as well as for ramp function. This
fixes false warning message for case like the added, or various cases in
cppcoro.
gcc/cp
2020-01-20 Bin Cheng
*
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
gcc/cp
2020-01-20 Jun Ma
* coroutines.cc (lookup_awaitable_member): Lookup an awaitable member.
(build_co_await): Use lookup_awaitable_member instead of lookup_member.
(finish_co_yield_expr, finish_co_await_expr): Add error check on return
Hi Bin,
bin.cheng wrote:
gcc/cp
2020-01-20 Bin Cheng
* coroutines.cc (build_co_await): Skip getting complete type for void.
gcc/testsuite
2020-01-20 Bin Cheng
* g++.dg/coroutines/co-await-void_type.C: New
test.<0001-Fix-ICE-when-co_awaiting-on-void-type.patch>
This LG
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
Hi
Accroding to N4835: When a coroutine is invoked, a copy is created
for each coroutine parameter. While in current implementation, we
only collect used parameters. This may lost behavior inside constructor
and destructor of unused parameters.
This patch change the imp
Hi Bin,
Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:28 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:59:20AM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Bin,
bin.cheng wrote:
gcc/cp
2020-01-20 Bin Cheng
* coroutines.cc (build_co_await): Skip getting complete type for void.
gcc
Hi Richard,
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jakub Jelinek writes:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:59:20AM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Do you really need one byte extra? I mean, sizeof ("__parm.") already
includes +1 for the terminating '\0', so unless you append something to
the b
Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 6:31 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>> Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:28 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:59:20AM +, Iain Sandoe wr
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
> 在 2020/1/20 下午6:07, Iain Sandoe 写道:
>> Hi JunMa,
>>
>> JunMa wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>> Accroding to N4835: When a coroutine is invoked, a copy is created
>>> for each coroutine parameter. While in current implementati
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/1/20 下午7:55, Iain Sandoe 写道:
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/1/20 下午6:07, Iain Sandoe 写道:
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
Hi
Accroding to N4835: When a coroutine is invoked, a copy is created
for each coroutine parameter. While in current implementation, we
only collect used
Hi Bin,
bin.cheng wrote:
> By standard, coroutine body should be encapsulated in try-catch block
> as following:
> try {
>// coroutine body
> } catch(...) {
>promise.unhandled_exception();
> }
> Given above try-catch block is implemented in the coroutine actor
> function called by cor
JunMa wrote:
> 在 2020/1/20 下午8:21, Iain Sandoe 写道:
>> JunMa wrote:
>>
>>> 在 2020/1/20 下午7:55, Iain Sandoe 写道:
>>>> Hi JunMa,
>>>>
>>>> JunMa wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 在 2020/1/20 下午6:07, Iain Sandoe 写道:
>
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/1/21 上午9:34, JunMa 写道:
在 2020/1/21 上午12:39, Iain Sandoe 写道:
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/1/20 下午8:21, Iain Sandoe 写道:
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/1/20 下午7:55, Iain Sandoe 写道:
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/1/20 下午6:07, Iain Sandoe 写道:
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
Hi
Accroding to
Hi Nathan,
This corrects my mixup between the error returns for complete_type and
complete_type_or_else, spotted by Jakub,
I have included Bin’s change that makes the coro-specific error message
fire if a void type is provided for this.
Additional comments below.
Iain Sandoe wrote
Hi Nathan, Bin,
bin.cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:59 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>> bin.cheng wrote:
>>
>>> By standard, coroutine body should be encapsulated in try-catch block
>>> as following:
>
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:52:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
PR target/93073
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_emit_cmove): Punt for compare_mode
other than SFmode or DFmode.
"If using fsel, punt for..." etc.
+ /* Don't allow compare_mode other th
8022264265dd39887a1723eeda8ae445afad1fde
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: 2020-01-26 20:49:04 +
coroutines: Fix whitespace and comment markers.
This amends the cases where inline comments in function calls were
followed by a space. It also fixes some uses of C++ style and wrongly
cases.
bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-darwin16,
OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-01-27 Iain Sandoe
PR c++/93443
* coroutines.cc (morph_fn_to_coro): Check the ramp return
value when it is constructed from the 'get return object'.
—
gcc/cp/cor
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Burgess wrote:
* Jeff Law [2020-01-22 13:52:27 -0700]:
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 15:39 +, Andrew Burgess wrote:
The motivation behind this change is to make it easier for a user to
link against static libraries on a target where dynamic libraries are
the default library t
).
Once we've emitted an error for this level of fail, then we suppress
additional copies (otherwise the same thing will be reported for every
coroutine keyword seen).
tested on x86_64-darwin16,
OK for trunk?
thanks
iain
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-01-28 Iain Sandoe
* coroutin
tion.
This suppresses all but the first instance in each coroutine.
tested on x86_64-darwin16
OK for master?
thanks
Iain
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-01-28 Iain Sandoe
* coroutines.cc (find_promise_type): Delete unused forward
declaration.
(struct coroutine_info): Add a bool for no promise
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 1/28/20 11:14 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> + if (!error_emitted &&
>> + (traits_decl == NULL_TREE || traits_decl == error_mark_node))
>> {
>>error_at (kw, "cannot find % template");
>> +
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 1/29/20 10:39 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi Nathan,
>> + /* If we are missing fundmental information, such as the traits, then
>> don't
>> + emit this for every keyword in a TU. This particular error is per TU
>&
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Burgess wrote:
> * Iain Sandoe [2020-01-28 10:34:52 +]:
>> * Before the patch, libcpp and gcc configury finds this and they agree on
>> the availability of ICONV (#define HAVE_ICONV 1).
>>
>> * After the patch libcpp no longer thinks
Hello Andrew,
Andrew Burgess wrote:
Here's a cleaned up version of the previous patch I posted. If Iain
reports this fixes the regressions he saw then I will push this.
I applied this to r10-6364 and tested on a bunch of Darwin platforms.
AFAICT, the configuration now reports consistent va
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 1/30/20 9:43 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi Nathan,
>
>> however. ….
>>> also, what if you find something, but it's not a type template?
>> … I’ve switched the complain off on lookup_qualified_name and now check for
>> a typ
Hi,
Another in the series of amendments following the switch to
default to no-common.
Tested on powerpc-darwin9,
applied to master,
thanks
Iain
--
This test explicitly tests for code generation that expects a
common section.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-02-02 Iain Sandoe
bin.cheng wrote:
This is an obvious patch fixing typo in maybe_promote_captured_temps,
previously, the vnum (== 0) is used for all captured temps...
Will commit later.
Yeah, I made this exact change locally yesterday (but I didn’t commit it yet,
so go ahead if you have time).
Iain
Hi JunMa,
JunMa wrote:
在 2020/2/4 下午8:17, JunMa 写道:
Hi
When testing coroutines with lambda function, I find we copy each captured
variable to frame. However, according to gimplify pass, for each
declaration
that is an alias for another expression(DECL_VALUE_EXPR), we can
substitute them di
used, the size
of the block is passed as the corresponding argument.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-02-07 Iain Sandoe
* coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Implement deallocation function
selection per n4849, dcl.fct.def.coroutine bullet 12.
(morph_fn_to_coro): Implement alloc
Hi Bin,
Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Ping.
We are seeking to clarify the standard wording around this (and the cases where
unhandled_exception() returns - hopefully during the WG21 meeting this week,
FWIW, I think your interpretation makes sense here.
thanks
Iain
>
> Thanks,
> bin
>
> On Mon, Feb 3,
th used for the comparison for ‘CFStringRef' was only comparing
for ‘CFString' potentially allowing mismatched identifiers.
2020-02-10 Iain Sandoe
PR other/93641
* config/darwin-c.c (darwin_cfstring_ref_p): Fix up last
argument of strncmp.
diff --git a/gc
Hello Bin, Nathan,
Iain Sandoe wrote:
We are seeking to clarify the standard wording around this (and the cases
where
unhandled_exception() returns - hopefully during the WG21 meeting this
week,
FWIW, I think your interpretation makes sense here.
It’s not clear if the committee will
Hi,
As discussed with Jason at WG21 in Prague - last year, this amends the
way in which the coroutine frame copies of variables are represented in
the front end lowering. Instead of an explicit pointer->field we now
apply a DECL_VALUE_EXPR to each instead (where that value is the
pointer->field).
need to be
copied since they are used in two different contexts during
the re-write (in the building of the ramp function, and in
the actor function itself).
This will assist in improvement of debugging (PR 99215).
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc
This is primarily code factoring, but we take this opportunity
to rename some of the implementation variables (which we intend
to expose to debugging) so that they are in the implementation
namespace.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc
support (PR 99215).
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (register_local_var_uses): Do not mangle
frame entries for the outermost scope. Record the outer
scope as nesting depth 0.
---
gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 11
Some of the compiler-generated entries are of interest to a
user debugging - keep variables in the implementation namespace
but avoid using periods as separators (which is not compatible
with visible symbols for some assemblers).
Partial improvement to debugging (PR 99215).
Signed-off-by: Iain
for these and populates
them on demand (avoiding repeated identifier calls).
Contributory to debug support (PR 99215)
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc: Add identifiers for implementation
variables that we want to expose to debug
'self handle'.
Whether the coroutine frame is allocated and needs to be freed.
These variables are given names that can be 'well-known' and advertised
in debug documentation - they are placed in the implementation namespace
and all begin with _Coro_.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sando
running.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (struct param_info): Add copy_var.
(build_actor_fn): Use simplified param references.
(register_param_uses): Likewise.
(rewrite_param_uses): Likewise.
(analyze_fn_parms): New function
e' is visible to debug.
Contributory to PR 99215.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Make _Coro_actor_continue
visible to debug.
---
gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.c
Hi,
Minor cleanup, this is statement not an expression, we do not
need to use finish_expr_stmt here.
tested on x86_64, powerpc64-linux, x86_64-darwin,
pushed to master as trivial/obvious, thanks
Iain
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (await_statement_walker
Hi,
Minor code-gen correction.
tested on x86_64, powerpc64 - linux, x86_64-darwin,
pushed to master as trivial/obvious, thanks
Iain
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Add begin/finish clauses
to the initial test in the actor
Hi,
The patch was approved here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562757.html
and here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/560604.html
subject to a documentation nit.
I ran out of time before stage3 ended .. and just got around to this now.
re-tested o
c64-linux,
pushed to master, thanks
Iain
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
PR objc/101718 - Objective-C frontend emits wrong code to call methods
returning scalar types returned in memory
PR objc/101718
gcc/objc/ChangeLog:
* objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c (build_v2_build_objc_method_c
this, and really I cannot enable Jit
reliably on Darwin since one failure mode is a deadlocked expect instance
so that the testsuite never completes until that is killed manually.
thanks
Iain
> On 19 Aug 2021, at 19:59, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Preface:
>
> this is t
Hi David,
> On 2 Sep 2021, at 15:47, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 19:59 +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> OK for master?
>
> Did you try this with RUN_UNDER_VALGRIND set? Assuming that that still
> works, yes, looks good to me.
For what configuration par
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 14:39, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/1/21 6:54 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> This is an efficiency measure and repeats the pattern used for
>> other identifiers used in the coroutine implementation.
>> In support of debugging, the user might well nee
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 14:39, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/1/21 6:54 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> This is an efficiency measure and repeats the pattern used for
>> other identifiers used in the coroutine implementation.
>> In support of debugging, the user might well nee
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 14:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/1/21 6:55 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> The user might well wish to inspect some of the state that represents
>> the implementation of the coroutine machine.
>> In particular:
>> The promise object.
&
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 15:12, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/3/21 9:56 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> On 3 Sep 2021, at 14:52, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/1/21 6:55 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>>> The user might well wish to inspect some of the stat
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 15:07, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On 9/1/21 6:56 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> This adds top level proxy variables for the coroutine frame
>> copies of the original function args. These are then available
>> in the debugger to
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 08:51, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>> On 2 Sep 2021, at 21:03, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/libgcc/soft-fp/eqdf2.c b/libgcc/soft-fp/eqdf2.c
>>> ind
implementation variables to
debug-friendly form.
(approved) [PATCH 8/8] coroutines: Make the continue handle visible to debug.
[PATCH 6/8] coroutines: Convert implementation variables to debug-friendly form.
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 15:21, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> On 3 Sep 2021, at 15:12, Jaso
Hello Jason,
> On 3 Sep 2021, at 15:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> On 3 Sep 2021, at 15:07, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/1/21 6:56 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> This adds top level proxy variables for the coroutine frame
>>> +
need to carry out any analysis - we just need
to detect the presence of any co_await.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (await_statement_walker): Code cleanups.
---
gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 121 ---
1 file changed, 56
also fixes a
bootstrap issue with some Darwin versions and clang as the bootstrap
compiler, where -no-PIE causes the correct relocation model to be
switched off leading to invalid user-space code.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in: Remove variables related to applyi
Hi Folks
> On 10 Sep 2021, at 16:16, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 9/10/2021 1:19 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> This removes the always defined DARWIN_PREFER_DWARF and the code
>> guarded by it being not defined, removing the possibility to
>> default some i386 darwin configurations to STAB
Hi Jason,
I was looking at handling some backports to 11.x and 10.x for coroutines
code-gen fixes ...
> On 7 May 2021, at 04:11, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> A change to check glvalue_p rather than specifically for TARGET_EXPR
> revealed issues with the coroutines code's use of the 'rvalue' functio
is no need to carry out any analysis - we just need
to detect the presence of any co_await.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* coroutines.cc (await_statement_walker): Code cleanups.
---
gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 121 ---
1 file changed, 56
> On 9 Sep 2021, at 17:15, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 8/18/21 3:13 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have found it useful when working with modules stuff to have the completed
>> set of command/responses available (some people working with the interfaces
>>
Hi Jason,
> On 15 Sep 2021, at 18:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/14/21 11:36, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi
>> Some small code cleanups that allow us to have just one place that
>> we handle a statement with await expression(s) embedded. Also we
>> can reduce th
201 - 300 of 1798 matches
Mail list logo
