OK for stage1 if bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 are ok?
Thanks,
- Tom
Fix edge probabilities in gimple_duplicate_sese_tail
2015-03-27 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/65511
* tree-cfg.c (gimple_duplicate_sese_tail): Fix edge probabilities and
counts.
* gcc.dg/parloops-prob.c: New t
,
- Tom
Fix bzero warning in child_setup_tty
2015-03-30 Tom de Vries
PR ada/65490
* terminals.c (child_setup_tty): Fix warning 'argument to sizeof in
bzero call is the same expression as the destination'.
---
gcc/ada/terminals.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletion
On 27-03-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65443, a todo in the parloops pass for function
transform_to_exit_first_loop:
...
TODO: the common case is that latch of the loop is empty and immediately
follows the loop exit. In this case, it would be better not to copy
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
that pass doesn't specify a chunk size on the GIMPLE_OMP_FOR it constructs, s
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
that pass doesn't specify a chunk
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
that pass doesn't specify a chunk
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
that pass doesn't specify a chunk
On 03-04-15 14:39, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 27-03-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65443, a todo in the parloops pass for function
transform_to_exit_first_loop:
...
TODO: the common case is that latch of the loop is empty and immediately
follows the loop exit. In
[stage1 ping^2]
On 10-03-15 16:30, Tom de Vries wrote:
[stage1 ping]
On 22-02-15 14:13, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 19-02-15 14:03, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Di
[stage1 ping^2]
On 10-03-15 16:31, Tom de Vries wrote:
[stage1 ping]
[was: Postpone expanding va_arg until pass_stdarg]
On 24-02-15 07:48, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 23-02-15 11:09, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 23-02-15 09:26, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
Btw, I&#
On 08/06/15 17:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
this patch fixes PR66444, a problem with -fipa-ra in reload_combine.
The problem is that for the test-case, reload_combine combines these two
insns:
Please work out with Vlad whether
On 08/06/15 17:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>this patch fixes PR66444, a problem with -fipa-ra in reload_combine.
>
>The problem is that for the test-case, reload_combine combines these two
>insns:
Please work out with
On 08/06/15 17:55, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Tom!
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:43:01 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
There are two problems in try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt:
1. In case the latch is not a singleton bb, the function should return
false rather than true.
2. The check for
On 09/06/15 00:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 08/06/15 17:55, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Tom!
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:43:01 +0200, Tom de Vries
wrote:
There are two problems in try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt:
1. In case the latch is not a singleton bb, the function should return
false
d
- passes with that hunk.
I'll put it through bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64.
OK for trunk if that goes well?
Thanks,
- Tom
Handle location in expand_ifn_va_arg_1
2015-06-09 Tom de Vries
* tree-stdarg.c (expand_ifn_va_arg_1): Handle location.
* gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c: New
On 09/06/15 13:07, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 17/04/15 12:08, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:38, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 19-03-15 12:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 18-03-15 18:22, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65460.
The patch marks
On 10/06/15 00:15, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Tom!
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:12:12 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 09/06/15 13:07, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 17/04/15 12:08, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 20-03-15 12:38, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 19-03-15 12:05, Tom
Hi,
this patch contains trivial improvements for test-cases
{libgomp.c,gcc.dg}/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt{,-2,-3}.c.
Committed to trunk.
Thanks,
- Tom
Update parloops-exit-first-loop-alt{,-2,-3}.c
2015-06-13 Tom de Vries
* testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-2.c: Add
nks,
- Tom
Add gcc.dg/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-4.c
2015-06-13 Tom de Vries
* gcc.dg/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-4.c: New test.
* testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-4.c: New test.
---
.../gcc.dg/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-4.c| 28 ++
.../libgomp.
sted tree expression
'(unsigned int) (_6 + -1)'
- strips the outer nops (assuming no change in value)
- uses '(unsigned int)_6' as the alt_bound, and
- gimplifies the expression.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Handle casts in bound in transform_to
On 13/03/15 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch moves a bunch of early-out tests from the parloops pass to the
gate function.
The only effect is for functions that we don't consider at all for
parallelization in the parloops
On 23/03/15 16:00, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
The gnat-style.texi part is OK. I cannot approve the fdl part though.
Gerald,
Can you approve the fdl part?
Let's assume I can. Okay.
Can you just describe the _why_ a bit in a @comment (in simple
On 30/03/15 11:54, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 30-03-15 10:15, Jan Hubicka wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
index 64bdc92..c7a7c4d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
@@ -6177,6 +6177,7 @@ gimple_duplicate_sese_tail (edge entry
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, edge exit
On 30/03/15 11:54, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 30-03-15 10:15, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Also move_sese_region_to_fn seem to mis updating of counts. Can you,
please, add that and send updated patch?
Like this?
OK for stage1 if bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 are ok?
Ping. Original posting at
On 14/06/15 23:49, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On June 14, 2015 10:55:59 AM GMT+02:00, Tom de Vries
wrote:
On 13/03/15 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Tom de Vries
wrote:
Hi,
this patch moves a bunch of early-out tests from the parloops pass
to the
Hi,
this patch removes superfluous dg-option "-O2" settings in
testsuite/libgomp.c. The setting is superfluous, because DEFAULT_CFLAGS
is already set to "-O2" in c.exp.
Tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Remove dg-options -O2 in libgomp.c
2015
K for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Run testsuite/libgomp.c++/c++.exp at -O2 by default
2015-06-15 Tom de Vries
* testsuite/libgomp.c++/c++.exp: Set DEFAULT_CFLAGS to -O2 if not
already set. Use DEFAULT_CFLAGS in dg-runtest.
* testsuite/libgomp.c++/atomic-16.C: Remove dg-options "-O2 -fopenmp
On 16/06/15 10:59, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
This patch adjusts omp-low.c:expand_omp_for_generic() to expand to a
"sequential"
loop form (without the OMP runtime calls), used for loop directives inside
OpenACC kernels constructs. Tom mentions that this allows the kernels
parallelization
to work whe
Committed this patch to fix bootstrap.
Thanks,
- Tom
Remove unused variable in lower_reduction_clauses
2015-06-16 Tom de Vries
* omp-low.c (lower_reduction_clauses): Remove unused variable call.
---
gcc/omp-low.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/omp
On 16/06/15 12:08, Tom de Vries wrote:
Committed this patch to fix bootstrap.
And this one.
Thanks,
- Tom
Declare parm unused in make_offloadable_1
2015-06-16 Tom de Vries
* varpool.c (make_offloadable_1): Declare decl with ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
---
gcc/varpool.c | 2 +-
1 file changed
On 13/06/15 16:24, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch allows try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt to succeed when
handling cases where the expression representing the number of
iterations contains a cast.
Currently, transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt testcase
gfortran/parloops-exit-first-loop
,
the property will be valid after transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Rewrite virtuals into lcssa in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c
es to make sure
they get properly parallelized.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Thanks,
- Tom
Fix parallelization for fortran oacc kernels tests
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* passes.def: Move pass_fre later in pass group pass_oacc_kernels,
replacing pass
On 18/06/15 12:48, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a problem with fortran loops in oacc kernels regions not being
parallelized, after introducting transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt.
For gfortran.dg/goacc/kernels-loop.f95, we get:
...
#pragma omp
On 18/06/15 13:38, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
transform_to_exit_first_loop contains the following comment:
...
/* Make sure that we have phi nodes on exit for all loop header phis
(create_parallel_loop requires that). */
...
I ran
On 16/06/15 13:18, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 14/06/15 23:49, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On June 14, 2015 10:55:59 AM GMT+02:00, Tom de Vries
wrote:
On 13/03/15 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Tom de
On 08/06/15 09:25, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
{
gsi_next (&gsi);
continue;
diff --git gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
index e417a15..449a615 100644
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
@@ -
> 1',
just like all the other tests of flag_parallelize_loops in the compiler.
Build on x86_64 and reg-tested libgomp's c.exp.
OK for trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds?
Thanks,
- Tom
Test for flag_parallelize_loops > 1
2015-06-19 Tom de Vries
ide or outside the
TV_DOM_FRONTIERS measurement.
- there is a level of ENABLE_CHECKING that is more appropriate for the
verify_dominators call.
Is this ok for trunk if bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 succeeds?
Thanks,
- Tom
Check dominator info in compute_dominance_frontiers
201
On 21/05/15 13:42, ber...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
Author: bernds
Date: Thu May 21 11:42:14 2015
New Revision: 223478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* omp-low.c (struct omp_region): Add a gwv_this field.
(bb_region_map): New variable.
(find_o
nch.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Thanks,
- Tom
Handle reduction in oacc kernels region
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c (struct reduction_info): Add reduc_addr field.
(create_call_for_reduction_1): Handle case that reduc_addr is non-NULL.
(gen_parallel_loop): Init clsn_d
On 22/06/15 12:14, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
during development of a patch I ran into a case where
compute_dominance_frontiers was called with incorrect dominance info.
The result was a segmentation violation somewhere in the bitmap code
On 22/06/15 13:47, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 22/06/15 12:14, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tom de Vries
wrote:
Hi,
during development of a patch I ran into a case where
compute_dominance_frontiers was called
On 22/06/15 13:47, Richard Biener wrote:
(eventually also for the case where we
>>end up only computing the fast-query stuff).
Like this?
...
diff --git a/gcc/dominance.c b/gcc/dominance.c
index 9c66ca2..58fc6fd 100644
--- a/gcc/dominance.c
+++ b/gcc/dominance.c
@@ -679,6 +679,12 @@ calculate_
On 19/06/15 11:26, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
DEF_GOMP_BUILTIN tests for 'flag_parallelize_loops'. But if
flag_parallelize_loops is one (which is also the default), then
pass_parloops doesn't do anything, and won't generate any OMP constructs.
This patch makes DE
update_stmt in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-22 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c (transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt): Add update_stmt
for cond_stmt.
---
gcc/tree-parloops.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-parloops.c b/gcc/tree-parloops.c
index 28112b2..7123c27
s.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x864_64 on top of gomp-4_0-branch in
combination with the patch series that triggered the problem.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x864_64 on top of trunk.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Handle unused reduction in create_loads_for_reductions
2015-06-22 Tom
Hi,
committed attached patch as trivial.
Thanks,
- Tom
Use abort in parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-{3,4}.c
2015-06-23 Tom de Vries
* testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c (main): Use
abort.
* testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-4.c (main): Same.
---
libgomp
Hi,
this patch moves rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa to
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c, as requested here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg01264.html .
Thanks,
- Tom
Move rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa to tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c
Hi,
this patch adds bitmap_get_dominated_by, a version of get_dominated_by
that returns a bitmap rather than a vector.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add bitmap_get_dominated_by
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* dominance.c (bitmap_get_dominated_by): New function.
* dominance.h
Hi,
this patch factors new function get_virtual_phi out of
rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add get_virtual_phi
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (get_virtual_phi): Factor out of ...
(rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa
Hi,
this patch factors out a new function replace_uses_in_dominated_bbs
out of rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add replace_uses_in_dominated_bbs
2015-06-18 Tom de Vries
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (replace_uses_in_dominated_bbs): Factor out
On 23/06/15 11:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 22/06/15 13:47, Richard Biener wrote:
(eventually also for the case where we
end up only computing the fast-query stuff).
Like this?
...
diff --git a/gcc/dominance.c b/gcc/dominance.c
index
2015-06-24 Tom de Vries
merge from gomp4 branch:
2015-06-24 Tom de Vries
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (get_virtual_phi): Factor out of ...
(rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa): ... here.
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (replace_uses_in_dominated_bbs): Factor out
of
exit block inbetween the
main loop header and the old exit block.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Add empty loop exit block in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-24 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/66642
* tree-parloops.c (transform_to_exit_firs
Hi,
this patch fixes the header comment of canonicalize_loop_ivs. The
generated IV is not guaranteed to be unsigned since the fix for PR49471.
Thanks,
- Tom
Remove 'unsigned' in header comment canonicalize_loop_ivs
2015-06-25 Tom de Vries
* tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (canonicaliz
-29 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c (try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt): Simplify
function structure.
---
gcc/tree-parloops.c | 59 ++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-parloops.c b/gcc/tree-parloops.c
15-06-29 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/66652
* tree-parloops.c (try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt): Use
max_loop_iterations to determine if nit + 1 overflows.
* testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c (f): Rewrite
using restrict pointers.
(main): Add arguments to calls
in try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-29 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c (try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt): If not found,
insert nit + 1 bound.
* testsuite/libgomp.fortran/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-2.f95: New test.
* testsuite/libgomp.fortran/parloops-exit-first-loop
On 22/06/15 16:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 13/06/15 16:24, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch allows try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt to succeed when
handling cases where the expression representing the number of
iterations contains a cast
On 29/06/15 19:58, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/29/2015 08:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR66652.
It uses max_loop_iterations in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt to
ensure that the new loop bound nit + 1 doesn't overflow.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for
On 25/06/15 09:43, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a failure with parloops for reduction loop testcase
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c. When we
exercise the low iteration count loop, the test-case fails.
To understand the problem, let's first look at
needed in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-30 Tom de Vries
* tree-parloops.c (transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt): Insert new exit
block only when needed.
---
gcc/tree-parloops.c | 42 --
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -
Hi,
This patch adds variants of parloops-exit-first-loop-alt.c, to cover all
combinations of loop bound signed/unsigned and loop counter signed/unsigned.
Committed to trunk.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-{5,6,7}.c
2015-06-29 Tom de Vries
* gcc.dg/parloops-exit-first
On 15/06/15 18:36, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch:
- sets DEFAULT_CFLAGS to -O2, if not set otherwise
(similar to what is done in c.exp)
- removes superfluous dg-options "-O2" settings.
- removes superfluous dg-options "-fopenmp" settings.
- uses dg-additional-option
[ was: Re: [patch] Run testsuite/libgomp.c++/c++.exp at -O2 by default ]
On 30/06/15 14:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:36:17PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch:
- sets DEFAULT_CFLAGS to -O2, if not set otherwise
(similar to what is done in c.exp)
- removes
[ was Re: [committed] Run testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c++/c++.exp at -O2 by
default ]
On 30/06/15 17:48, Tom de Vries wrote:
[ was: Re: [patch] Run testsuite/libgomp.c++/c++.exp at -O2 by default ]
On 30/06/15 14:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:36:17PM +0200, Tom de Vries
27;ve committed attached patch to gomp-4_0-branch, before finding this
patch (which is a bit more thorough). You can drop it with the next
merge from trunk.
Thanks,
- Tom
Run libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib-62.c only for nvidia
2015-07-01 Tom de Vries
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib
acefully handle acc_init (nvidia) when not supported
2015-07-01 Tom de Vries
* oacc-init.c (acc_init_1): Move base_dev NULL test to before use.
* testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
(check_effective_target_openacc_nvidia_accel_supported): New proc.
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib-93.c: Ne
Attached patch makes sure that both current failure modes are tested and
accepted.
OK for gomp-4_0-branch?
Thanks,
- Tom
Fix libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib-3.c
2015-07-01 Tom de Vries
* testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp (offload_targets_nonhost): New var.
(check_effective_target_offload_target_no
longer the same, and a
bit later we hit the ICE.
III.
Attached patch fixes the ICE by handling PARM_DECL in remap_gimple_op_r.
[ I'm not confident though this is the right fix ]
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk, or to be fixed otherwise?
Thanks,
- Tom
Handle PARM_DECL i
Thanks,
- Tom
Fix compilation libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g
2015-07-01 Tom de Vries
PR tree-optimization/66716
* tree-cfg.c (gimple_split_block_before_cond_jump): Split before
cond_jump, instead of split after last nondebug insn before cond_jump.
* c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-
On 01/07/15 13:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I.
When running test libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1.c with '--target_board
unix/-O2/-g', we run into this failure:
...
FAIL: libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess e
Hi,
I've committed this patch, which rewrites the scan lines in test-case
i386/vararg-loc.c from scan-assembler to scan-rtl-dump, to fix PR66723.
Thanks,
- Tom
Use scan-rtl-dump in i386/vararg-loc.c
2015-07-01 Tom de Vries
PR testsuite/66723
* gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c: Use sca
Hi,
Using attached untested patch, I managed to minimize a test-case failure
for PR 66714.
The patch introduces two-phase marking in gt_cleare_cache:
- first phase, it loops over all the hash table entries and removes
those which are dead
- second phase, it runs over all the live hash table
On 25/06/15 09:42, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch merges rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa (originally
submitted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg01236.html
) to trunk.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Ping.
Thanks,
- Tom
0001-Merge
On 25/06/15 09:43, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a failure with parloops for reduction loop testcase
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c. When we
exercise the low iteration count loop, the test-case fails.
To understand the problem, let's first look at
On 06/07/15 15:29, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
Using attached untested patch, I managed to minimize a test-case failure for
PR 66714.
The patch introduces two-phase marking in
Hi,
currently, we have these spec strings in gcc/gcc.c involving
ftree-parallelize-loops:
...
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:%:include(libgomp.spec)%(link_gomp)}
%{fopenacc|fopenmp|ftree-parallelize-loops=*:-pthread}"
...
Actually, ftree-parallelize-loops={0,1} means that no para
On 07/07/15 10:42, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 06/07/15 15:29, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Tom de Vries
wrote:
Hi,
Using attached untested patch, I managed
On 06/07/15 15:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 25/06/15 09:42, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch merges rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa (originally
submitted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg01236.html
) to trunk.
Bootstrapped
On 08/07/15 12:40, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tom de Vries writes:
* testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c (main): Test low
iteration count case.
../../../../libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c: In
function 'main':
../../../
[ was: Re: [PING][PATCH, 1/2] Merge
rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa from gomp4 branch ]
On 07/07/15 17:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
Bootstrapped reg-tested on x86_64.
Committed to trunk as attached.
Reverted related patches on gomp-4_0-branch, and committed this patch
instead.
Thanks
On 09/07/15 05:33, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/07/2015 09:58 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
[Big snip]
0001-Add-rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa.patch
Add rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa
2015-07-07 Tom de Vries
* tree-cfg.c (get_virtual_phi): New function.
* tree-cfg.h
d does not
increase runtime.
Passes a minimal c build, and it fixes the ICE of PR66714 (although
there still might be a root cause to address, I'm not sure).
Thanks,
- Tom
Use conservative non-iterative strategy for caches
2015-07-09 Tom de Vries
PR libgomp/66714
* hash-table.h (
On 07/07/15 17:58, Tom de Vries wrote:
If you can
handle one exit edge I also can't see the difficulty in handling
all exit edges.
Agreed, that doesn't look to complicated. I could call
rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa for all loops in
rewrite_virtuals_into_loop_closed_ssa,
On 29/06/15 16:30, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch allows try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt to handle the
case that the new loop bound nit + 1 is not available as ssa-name n in
the assignment nit = n - 1, by inserting the new loop bound.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for
On 09/07/15 12:44, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 07/07/15 16:00, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
By doing so, we make the behaviour of gt_cleare_cache independent
of the
order in which the entries are visited, turning:
- hard-to-trigger bugs which trigger for one
Hi,
This patch fixes PR64707.
It marks fopenmp as LTO option, which enables openmp builtins in lto1.
Bootstrapped, reg-tested on x86_64 and committed.
Thanks,
- Tom
2015-01-22 Tom de Vries
PR libgomp/64707
* lto-opts.c (lto_write_options): Output non-explicit conservative
-fno-openmp
Hi,
This patch fixes PR64672.
It marks fopenacc as LTO option, which enables openacc builtins in lto1.
Bootstrapped, reg-tested on x86_64 and committed.
Thanks,
- Tom
2015-01-22 Tom de Vries
PR libgomp/64672
* lto-opts.c (lto_write_options): Output non-explicit conservative
-fno
stead of avx512?
Attached patch ok for stage4 trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
2015-01-24 Tom de Vries
* gcc.target/i386/funcspec-5.c: Replace avx512 with avx512f.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/funcspec-5.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.
On 24-01-15 20:41, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Friday 2014-11-21 10:07, Alex Velenko wrote:
Can someone, please, approve?
we tried to document this in https://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html .
Can you perhaps suggest a way for us to improve this to make
it more clear or easier to find?
Ho
ntry.
This patch updates the scan-tree-dump to match the pic/nonpic behaviour.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
2015-02-04 Tom de Vries
* gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c: Fix scan-tree-dump for fpic.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c
index 9df
On 26-01-15 15:47, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } *
On 09-02-15 09:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 26-01-15 15:47, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c(revision 0)
+++ gcc
On 09-02-15 18:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Tom,
After these changes I have the following regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*:
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for warnings, line 22)
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times gr
On 09-02-15 20:01, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Le 9 févr. 2015 à 19:10, Tom de Vries mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com>> a écrit :
On 09-02-15 18:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Tom,
After these changes I have the following regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*:
FAIL: gcc.dg/
On 11-02-15 10:22, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Le 10 févr. 2015 à 12:42, Tom de Vries a écrit :
I think we need to understand first what's going on.
Sure, my patch was mainly to silence the failures on my working tree.
In both test-cases, on Linux with -fpic the inlining of one
Committed new test-case.
Thanks,
- Tom
2015-02-17 Tom de Vries
* gcc.target/x86_64/abi/callabi/vaarg-6.c: New test.
---
.../gcc.target/x86_64/abi/callabi/vaarg-6.c| 40 ++
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/x86_64/abi
regression or documentation fix, so it doesn't classify as a stage
4 patch. I could imagine it still being included in stage4 because it adds the
possibility for a workaround in case of problems.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for stage1 (or even stage 4)?
Thanks,
- Tom
2015-0
1201 - 1300 of 2350 matches
Mail list logo
