ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2014 03:46 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I guess we need to call complete_type before aggregate_value_p.
complete_type_or_else, actually.
Jason
2014-04-18 Dinar Temirbulatov dtemirbula...@gmail.com
PR c++/57958
* semantics.c
I found typo in the testcase header, fixed. Ok to apply to trunk?
thanks, Dinar.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Dinar Temirbulatov
dtemirbula...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Here is another version of fix. This time, I added
complete_type_or_else call just before aggregate_value_p
Hi,
I revised the patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00083.html.
This change fixes PR57958 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57958)
For this code:
auto fn = [] (const FooData x) {
return (x);
};
{
FooData a;
fn(a);
}
Current version of trunk
Hi,
Following change fixes gimple production for lambda function, in the
patch I assumed that constructing COMPOUND_EXPR for the return value
of auto type function resoluted to CLASS_TYPE_P is wrong. Tested
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by applying to trunk with no new regressions.
Thanks, Dinar.
Ping?
Hi,
Here is the patch, Tested by profiledbootstrap. Ok for google gcc-4.8?
thanks, Dinar.
profiledbootstrap-fix1.patch
Description: Binary data
is the failure
mode you see from this code?
Thanks,
Teresa
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Dinar Temirbulatov
di...@kugelworks.com wrote:
Hello
This change allows to complete profiledbootstrap on the google gcc-4.8
branch, tested with make bootstrap with no new regressions. OK for
google 4.8
Hello
This change allows to complete profiledbootstrap on the google gcc-4.8
branch, tested with make bootstrap with no new regressions. OK for
google 4.8?
thanks, Dinar.
profiledbootstrap-fix.patch
Description: Binary data
as-is removes the one use of PARAM_GCOV_DEBUG (which is on
by default) without removing the parameter itself. What is the failure
mode you see from this code?
Thanks,
Teresa
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Dinar Temirbulatov
di...@kugelworks.com wrote:
Hello
This change allows to complete
with no errors.
thanks, Dinar.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:39:58AM +0400, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
I am investigating the problem.
I'd guess you
Hi,
I updated MAINTAINERS list with following change(patch attached).
thanks, Dinar.
MAINTAINERS.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
oh, This is my mistake I should have bootstrap the compiler. I am
investigating the problem.
thanks, Dinar.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:50 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Dinar Temirbulatov
di...@kugelworks.com wrote:
Here is the corrected
++ enabled. Ok for trunk?
thanks, Dinar.
2013-05-28 Dinar Temirbulatov di...@kugelworks.com
PR rtl-optimization/57268
* sched-deps.c (sched_analyze_2): Flush dependence list
then it is longer than MAX_PENDING_LIST_LENGTH.
fix.patch
Description: Binary data
, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the scheduler created long dependence list about ~9000
elements long and slowed compilation time for about an hour. Attached
patch flushes the dependence list is case of it is longer than
MAX_PENDING_LIST_LENGTH. Tested with gcc testsite on x86_64
MAX_PENDING_LIST_LENGTH.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/29/2013 06:52 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the scheduler created long dependence list about ~9000
elements
Hi,
During investigation of some defect, I found that for HImode reload
pass generated three instruction with QImode but for modern arm
machines that could be done with just one instruction. Attached patch
adds that capability.
thanks, Dinar.
Hi Ramana,
Here is obvious fix for PR49423, I just added pool range for
arm_zero_extendqisi2, arm_zero_extendqisi2_v6, arm_zero_extendhisi2,
arm_zero_extendhisi2_v6 patterns.
thanks, Dinar.
PR49423.patch
Description: Binary data
?
thanks, Dinar.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 14/06/12 19:46, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
Hi,
OK for trunk?
thanks, Dinar.
I'm still not comfortable about the code bloat that this is likely to
incurr at -O2.
R
Hi,
OK for trunk?
thanks, Dinar.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
Il 12/06/2012 08:52, Dinar Temirbulatov ha scritto:
is safe? That is, that the underflows cannot produce a wrong result?
[snip]
Thanks very much!
Paolo
2012-06-14
Hi, Paolo.
Here is the new version of patch. I have tested this version with gcc
testsuite only on i686 without new regressions, for now. Mips and arm
tests are in progress.
One strange thing I noticed:
No need for this gen_reg_rtx, either, by passing a NULL_RTX target below.
+
, cres, 32, ccst, 1);
This 32 should be GET_MODE_BITSIZE (word_mode).
Here, too.
Paolo
2012-06-07 Dinar Temirbulatov dtemirbula...@gmail.com
Alexey Kravets mr.kayr...@gmail.com
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_rtx_costs_1): Add cost estimate for the integer
?
thanks, Dinar.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/22/12 07:05, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
+ if ((size - 1 BITS_PER_WORD
+ BITS_PER_WORD == 32 mode == DImode)
Do note that this patch will not go in with hard-coded
SImode and DImode
Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 03/05/12 11:27, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
This clearly needs more work.
Comments: Need to end with a period and two spaces.
Binary Operators: Need to be surrounded with white space.
sorry for this, hope I resolved such issues with the new version
Hi,
Here is updated version of patch. I added comments describing the algorithm.
Hi Dinar. I'm afraid it gives the wrong results for some dividends
* 82625484914982912 / 2023346444509052928: gives 4096, should be zero
* 18317463604061229328 / 2023346444509052928: gives 4109, should be 9
*
Hi,
Here is the patch that adds support for divide 64-bit by constant for
32-bit target machines, this patch was tested on arm-7a with no new
regressions, also I am not sure on how to avoid for example i686
targets since div operation there is fast compared to over targets and
it showed better
hi, Richard,
This version of patch showed no regressions on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu.
Thanks, Dinar.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dinar Temirbulatov dtemirbula...@gmail.com writes:
@@ -14696,7 +14696,11
PM, Dinar Temirbulatov
dtemirbula...@gmail.com wrote:
hi, Richard,
This version of patch showed no regressions on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu.
Thanks, Dinar.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dinar Temirbulatov dtemirbula
26 matches
Mail list logo
