On Oct 6, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
>
> I'm looking for permission to backport this patch to the gcc-7 branch to fix
> the failing tests there as well.
Ok.
Tamar Christina; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard
Earnshaw; ni...@redhat.com; Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: Re: [GCC][PATCH][TESTSUITE][ARM][COMMITTED] Invert check to misalign
in vect_hw_misalign (PR 78421)
On Sep 25, 2017, at 9:58 PM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.o
On Sep 25, 2017, at 9:58 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> Yes, thanks! I was missing the 'expr' part.
>
> Here is what I have committed (r253187), to avoid further noise in the
> results.
Yup, looks good. Thanks.
On 25 September 2017 at 20:19, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> The attached patch would apply after reverting yours.
>> I've applied it against r253072 (just before your patch) and the
>> results
On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> The attached patch would apply after reverting yours.
> I've applied it against r253072 (just before your patch) and the
> results are visible at:
>
gnu.org; nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw;
>> ni...@redhat.com; Kyrylo Tkachov
>> Subject: Re: [GCC][PATCH][TESTSUITE][ARM][COMMITTED] Invert check to
>> misalign in vect_hw_misalign (PR 78421)
>>
>> On 23 September 2017 at 16:12, Christophe Lyon
>>
PATCH][TESTSUITE][ARM][COMMITTED] Invert check to
> misalign in vect_hw_misalign (PR 78421)
>
> On 23 September 2017 at 16:12, Christophe Lyon
> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 21 September 2017 at 16:48, Tamar Christina
> <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
On 23 September 2017 at 16:12, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 21 September 2017 at 16:48, Tamar Christina
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Commit r244796 changed vect_hw_misalign for arm to check against
>> arm_vect_no_misalign. However
On 21 September 2017 at 16:48, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Commit r244796 changed vect_hw_misalign for arm to check against
> arm_vect_no_misalign. However vect_hw_misalign is supposed to check if
> a target supports misalign access, while arm_vect_no_misalign
Hi All,
Commit r244796 changed vect_hw_misalign for arm to check against
arm_vect_no_misalign. However vect_hw_misalign is supposed to check if
a target supports misalign access, while arm_vect_no_misalign checks that
a target only supports aligned access.
As such the results need to be inverted
10 matches
Mail list logo