On 19.03.2012 17:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP, CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a "fix" like the following,
please consider for adding it.
Here's the full orig
om; d...@false.org
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] eh_personality.cc: unwinding on ARM
>
> On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP,
> CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
> > The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a "fix" like the following,
> > please consider for adding it.
>
On 19.03.2012 18:32, Paul Brook wrote:
while I have your attention: what is an virtual unwind frame? ;)
No such thing exists.
Throwing an exception is a muti-stage process. It requires unwinding the
stack frame twice, taking different actions in the process. "Forced"
unwinding and backtracing
> while I have your attention: what is an virtual unwind frame? ;)
No such thing exists.
Throwing an exception is a muti-stage process. It requires unwinding the
stack frame twice, taking different actions in the process. "Forced"
unwinding and backtracing add extra complications. The _US_*
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Stubbs
> wrote:
> > On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP,
> CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
> >>
> >> The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a "fix" like the following,
> >> please consider for adding it.
> >
> >
> > Here's the full original patch with
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP, CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
>>
>> The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a "fix" like the following,
>> please consider for adding it.
>
>
> Here's the full original patch with ChangeLog.
>
> I do
On 16/03/12 13:29, EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP, CM-AI/PJ-CF31) wrote:
The CodeSourcery toolchain contains a "fix" like the following,
please consider for adding it.
Here's the full original patch with ChangeLog.
I don't know why Dan never submitted this one. Perhaps it's not suitable
fo
Sorry this is a resend with corrected email addresses,
I noticed a bug in the __ARM_EABI_UNWINDER__ case that shows up
as a loop in backtrace():
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0x4c8c11cc]
/lib/libc.so.6[0x4c8c62a8]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x38)[0x4c8c63a8]
./bt(_Z6nqueenPiii+0xf0)[0xa8
Hi,
I noticed a bug in the __ARM_EABI_UNWINDER__ case that shows up
as a loop in backtrace():
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0x4c8c11cc]
/lib/libc.so.6[0x4c8c62a8]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x38)[0x4c8c63a8]
./bt(_Z6nqueenPiii+0xf0)[0xa8e0]
./bt(_Z6nqueenPiii+0xf0)[0xa8e0]
./bt(_Z6nqueenP
