On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I would like to point out that the patched compiler now also emits
> address registers in their natural mode (modulo zero-extended RTXes)
> and fixes following failure on Pmode == SImode targets:
>
> --cut here--
> struct foo
> {
> int *f;
>
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
> We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
> OK for trun
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
OK for trunk?
>>>
2012-03-02 H.J. Lu
* config/
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>>> We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
>>> OK for trunk?
>>
>>> 2012-03-02 H.J. Lu
>>>
>>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
>>>
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
>> OK for trunk?
>
>> 2012-03-02 H.J. Lu
>>
>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
>> zero-extended DImode addresses.
>
> OK.
The patch was
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:38 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
> OK for trunk?
> 2012-03-02 H.J. Lu
>
> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
> zero-extended DImode addresses.
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
Hi,
We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
OK for trunk?
BTW, all my 10 addr32 patches are tested on Linux/x86-64.
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2012-03-02 H.J. Lu
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
zero-extended DImode addresses.
diff --g
