Hi all,
two weeks have passed with no complains about the patch for PR103970. Therefore
backported and pushed to gcc-11 as 680ee9c3332.
Regards,
Andre
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:39:17 +0100
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I don't know why that bootstrapped initially. I fixed
Hi Tobias,
I don't know why that bootstrapped initially. I fixed the patch (naming a
```
else
/* Prevent warning. */
cdesc = NULL_TREE;
```
obvious) and rerun bootstrap making sure to purge everything beforehand. It did
not break bootstrap on x86_64-linux/f35. Hope it doesn't elsewhere with
Hi Tobias,
ups, sorry, reverted immediately.
Regards,
Andre
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:27:26 +0100
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> your patch breaks bootstrapping:
>
> ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc: In function ‘tree_node*
> structure_alloc_comps(gfc_symbol*, tree,
Hi Andre,
your patch breaks bootstrapping:
../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc: In function ‘tree_node*
structure_alloc_comps(gfc_symbol*, tree, tree, int, int, int,
gfc_co_subroutines_args*)’:
../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc:9200:42: error: ‘cdesc’ may be used
Hi Harald,
thanks for the fast review. I have submitted as c9c48ab7bad.
Will wait for two weeks (reminder set :-)) before backporting to gcc-11.
Thank you and regards,
Andre
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:30:22 +0100
Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> Hi Andre',
>
> Am 25.01.22 um 17:32
Hi Andre',
Am 25.01.22 um 17:32 schrieb Andre Vehreschild via Fortran:
Hi all,
attached patch fixes wrong code generation when broadcasting a derived type
containing allocatable and non-allocatable scalars. Furthermore does it prevent
broadcasting of coarray-tokens, which are always local
Hi all,
attached patch fixes wrong code generation when broadcasting a derived type
containing allocatable and non-allocatable scalars. Furthermore does it prevent
broadcasting of coarray-tokens, which are always local this_image. Thus having
them on a different image makes no sense.
